User talk:Donald Trung/Archive 101

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

13:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Possibly extract files from here. 📁

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:44, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Extract the following:

  • Tian Qing Yuan Bao (天慶元寶) .
  • Da Kang Yuan Bao (大康元寶).

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 11:51, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

HongPing Taels (Hang Ping Hua Bao) banknotes to import to WikimediaCommons.

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #365

Re:Angela Criss gender

I don't know for certain, but I'm fairly sure that this person is male, given the context of some of their edits at en.wiki (including a number of personal attacks). I don't know what it is with their "multiple personality" issues or obsession with using gender-specific usernames (including both males and females) but after observing their edits and comments, I concluded that this person is probably a guy. (Incidentally, his current social media username is also "Jack Gaines".) LightandDark2000 (talk) 06:50, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

@LightandDark2000: , that makes sense, thank you for clarifying. Then I'll be using gender neutral pronouns when tagging them in the future. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Nieuwsbrief 82 Wikimedia Nederland

Info over nieuwsbrief · Inschrijven/Uitschrijven · Global message delivery · Germien Cox (WMNL) (overleg) 27 mei 2019 11:40 (CET)

Wikidata weekly summary #366

15:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

This Month in Education: May 2019

This Month in Education

Volume 8 • Issue 5 • May 2019


ContentsHeadlinesSubscribe


In This Issue

About This Month in Education · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 07:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Chinese Kèpèngs en afbeeldingen

@Quistnix: ,

Kan jij mij een bericht op deze overlegpagina (of die op de NLWiki) sturen wanneer je klaar bent met alle artikelen over Chinese Kèpèngs? Dan kan ik de missende (of is het "ontbrekende"?) afbeeldingen in de lijsten van Chinese Kèpèng-munten bij inscriptie plaatsen. Ik heb al een groot aantal nieuwe afbeeldingen op Wikimedia Commons kunnen uploaden en ben al een paar maanden klaar met alle vrije afbeeldingen van Chinese Kèpèngs, Chinese amuletten, Etc. Naar Wikimedia Commons te importeren, maar laatst had Andrew West (BabelStone) weer een aantal nieuwe afbeeldingen van Khitan-munten geüpdatet dus groeien die categorieën nog steeds. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:52, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

Winkelcentrum de Triade logo's to import

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Assen-Alert! stuff to import to Wikimedia Commons.

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:27, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Reminder : "Commons Certified Partner™ ".

Remember to work on a "Commons Certified Partner™" proposal for verifying companies and/or websites interested in donatig their works to Wikimedia Commons. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:13, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome at my incubator. What would it entail? Who's gonna register the trademark? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: , good that you asked, as I'm quite busy I might forget more than half of my original proposal before I "put it to paper" (digital paper, of course) so it would be wise to write ✍🏻 down here what I have come up with in some broad terms.
I think that either the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) or Wikimedia Deutschland (WMDE) will register it if it's ever necessary, but it will be the same kind of trademark as already exists for the Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia logos.
The project itself will be verified through an OTRS-like system, the OTRS itself, or another kind of system (hopefully something more public) and will have a WikiPhonebook where either company accounts and/or employee accounts are listed, paid editors would not necessarily have to disclose their volunteer accounts and contact details will be for transparency's sake. This WikiPhonebook could essentially be like the yellow pages and could be at "Commons:Commons Certified Partner/Partners" organised alphabetically and employees as sub-pages of their companies.
There could be "a special badge" with the logo that people could place on their websites that would link to the "Commons:Commons Certified Partner" (or their dedicated sub-page) to both advertise their donations and the partnership programme itself. Companies can then show that they care about sharing knowledge freely and it would be free advertisement for Wikimedia Commons itself.
Every company could have their own maintenance category like "Category:Media contributed by Business Inc." or "Category:Media contributed by Museum LLC" which would be a sub-category of "Category:Media contributed under the Commons Certified Partnership programme".
Furthermore I was thinking of making it similar to the "Wikipedian in Residence" (WiR) programme where schools and other educational institutions could become Commons Certified Partners and introduce students to how Wikimedia Commons works and what they can do with the website. I know that Wikidata has a similar programme already and millions of pages have been donated thanks to third (3rd) party donors so such a programme could be greatly beneficial for the availability of free knowledge on Wikimedia Commons too.
Your feedback would be highly appreciated. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
I don't have too much to say about it right now. I'm not fully clear on the advantages for partners and what will drive contributions. (besides caring about free knowledge) Why would anyone hire a Commons partner? And what would be the criteria to become a Commons partner? What about scummy companies that try to become a Commons partner? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

The thing is that honestly I don't have the time to draft and write ✍🏻 this proposal to the level I want and I will have probably forgotten more than half of it by the time I will finally have to time to work on it. I am working on a huge project at the English-language Wikipedia. I have to balance work, family 👪🏻, lots of volunteering, Wikimedia Commons photography, Wikimedia Commons uploading, and drafting the huge Manchu Qing Dynasty paper money project on the English-language Wikipedia, this proposal simply doesn't make the list(, yet). The thing about huge projects on Wikipedia is that they always split into many smaller articles and get theur own navigational template and often require more work on Wikimedia Commons looking for related images of the subjects at hand. I deliberately postponed this project and procrastinated around it writing about all Chinese paper money up until the Ming Dynasty simply because the information ℹ and the sources for this period are overabundant. I draft proposals in my Microsoft Outlookk e-mail 📧 client and have so many Manchu Ing Dynasty paper money drafts that if woUld start working on this now that it would drown in the other drafts and disappear. Of course this idea 💡 should be something that is actually feasible otherwise it will be wasted.

How do you draft? Do you do it systematically? Do you have planned future proposals based on proposals that you need to have adopted before you go further or do you just address an issue after you run into it yourself? --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Uhm I'll go with answer D. All of the above. For more complex proposals like yours, a systematic approach is best. If you can type fast, just write down your entire stream of thought first. If not, go right to step two: reduce the stream of thought to two things: 1. What is the goal of this idea? 2. All key points without details. (I rarely publish that step) What needs to be done, advantages, disadvantages, possible problems. Once you have that, you can start writing something in a more coherent story form.
Sometimes I put proposals on hold because something else needs to happen first. Depends on the proposal. Currently a lot is on hold because simply time.
Sometimes I run into something and it's not too complex. In that case I can go right ahead, like with the convert-to-DR thing. But I misjudge that more often than I'd like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
    • @Alexis Jazz: , great! more than half of it is already done, time to think of some improvements to the current system, maybe I should just initially propose to introduce the "Commons Certified Partner™ " badge for websites and/or organisations to help promote Wikimedia Commons to various institutions. Let's be honest, smearing a Creative Commons logo and a (spam)link to the Creative Conmons website on literally every Wikimedia page greatly helps promote that company, if we have a similar system where institutions feel "rewarded" for donating their works "to us" (to the world, actually) then this would give more incentive to others to join. We just have to convince the marketing departments that donating their works will be beneficial to them and expose them to more potential customers. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:22, 7 June 2019 (UTC)