User talk:Spike

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Spike!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

San Sebastian Panorama Igeldo 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Sebastian Panorama Igeldo 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good sharpness and full of details. But comparing the top of the montains on the right with sea level on the left, I don´t think the alignment of the images is corrct here. The right part seems too much bent downwards. Please add metadata. --Milseburg 13:44, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Reply I'm sorry, but I don't know what kind of metadata is meant. I have stitched the images with Hugin using a cylindrical projection. I could try "dragging" the projection to get the right part of the image higher.Spike 20:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Reply New version of image uploaded. Horizon has been raised on the right side of the panorama in Hugin. Spike 22:27, 18 October 2016 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support Maybe you could lift up the horizon a bit further more on the right side. But IMHO it´s enough for QI. Metadata were normally transfered automatically and added at the bottom of the the imagepage. --Milseburg 09:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About the Portrait of Alexander Reid, Van Gogh[edit]

Hi, thanks, you're right, I've updated the source of this file and two more. Bests, Jaipasdepseudo (talk) 12:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Glen Orchy 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glen Orchy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:24, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Creag Mhor Loch Gynack 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Creag Mhor Loch Gynack 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Loch Ewe Panorama 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loch Ewe Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Little Loch Broom Panorama 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little Loch Broom Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rondvatnet 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rondvatnet 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Resolution is low for this kind of image and it is not sharp enough. Please try to improve the image. And please do not remove the EXIF data. --XRay 04:09, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Have uploaded larger version (Hugin automatically computes an output image size but apparently it is not the "optimal" one. You have to explicitly press the "Compute optimal size" button.) And it is not enough to have the checkbox "Use Exiftool to transfer metadata to output files" checked. I have copied the Exif data manually. Have also used the Sharpen tool. Spike 22:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 04:35, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aidasol Trondheim 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aidasol Trondheim 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please correct the perspective/verticals, see buildings on the left and right handside. Otherwise OK. --Basotxerri 08:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Performed perspective correction. Spike 19:31, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dalsnibba Panorama 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalsnibba Panorama 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Highlights near right could be toned down --Daniel Case 17:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Tried to tone done highlights using https://www.gimp.org/tutorials/ContrastMask/ with 50% opacity. Spike 20:25, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK now. --Daniel Case 01:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Antibes Baie des Milliardaires 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antibes Baie des Milliardaires 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nice from Castle Hill 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nice from Castle Hill 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:08, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Monaco 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monaco 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Cannes from Suquet Tower 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cannes from Suquet Tower 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Antibes Port Vauban 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antibes Port Vauban 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:43, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lucca San Michele in Foro 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucca San Michele in Foro 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 21:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lucca Cathedral interior and ceiling 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucca Cathedral interior and ceiling 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --IM3847 13:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Montecatini Terme with Montecatini Alto 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montecatini Terme with Montecatini Alto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would not have given so much space to the empty sky, but the quality is good. --Milseburg 14:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pistoia Panorama 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pistoia Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Barga Panorama 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barga Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but spend more light to the dark parts in the foreground. --Milseburg 08:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Lightened the foreground without changing the rest of the image but now the transitions between the parts are a little rough. Spike 21:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support Rough transitions? I think ist´s QI now. --Milseburg 13:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bagno Vignoni Piazza delle Sorgenti 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagno Vignoni Piazza delle Sorgenti 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting view. Nice mood. Good quality. --Tsui 02:40, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

San Galgano Abbey interior 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Galgano Abbey interior 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

San Galgano Abbey 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Galgano Abbey 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Lucca San Michele in Foro facade 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucca San Michele in Foro facade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:10, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seoul Gangnyeongjeon 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seoul Gangnyeongjeon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Seoul Throne in Geunjeongjeon 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seoul Throne in Geunjeongjeon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 14:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Loch an Eilein Panorama 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loch an Eilein Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cortona Camucia Panorama 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cortona Camucia Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:59, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schloss Kunreuth 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Kunreuth 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wind Turbine Enercon E-82 at Wind Park Mausdorf 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wind Turbine Enercon E-82 at Wind Park Mausdorf 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wind Turbine Enercon E-82 at Wind Park Mausdorf 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wind Turbine Enercon E-82 at Wind Park Mausdorf 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gößweinstein Basilica 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gößweinstein Basilica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ebrach Abbey Panorama 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebrach Abbey Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Steinerner Beutel 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinerner Beutel 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bad Staffelstein Panorama 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Panorama 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality after removing the spot in the sky. --Milseburg 14:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Whoops! I have removed the spot. Spike 20:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Symbol support vote.svg Support--Milseburg 14:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]