Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wehranlage Grosshesselohe XL.jpg

File:Wehranlage Grosshesselohe XL.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2011 at 01:01:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wehranlage Grosshesselohe XL.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wehranlage Grosshesselohe XL.jpg

•  Info created & uploaded by Richard Bartz - - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 01:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 01:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Nice Raghith (talk) 17:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:53, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 11:26, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Sharpening over-processed, leaving a bright fringe along the top of the trees on the half-right of the image. This specific area should be corrected first. Sting (talk) 14:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support   • Richard • [®] • 17:35, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Sting is correct, sharpening has been overdone. Still a pretty nice photo though. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Yeah, a nice photo but a bit boring imo. Going against my own rules, we expect some magic from Richard. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I like it, it provides a very nice overview of the area, well framed, interesting. (And we should apply same standards to all :)--ELEKHH^T 07:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Bergwolf (talk) 20:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Georgez (talk) 23:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 11:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice mood, composition and lighting, but per Sting. I don't think it's oversharpened, but I think sky was processed separately (I tried this several times, so I know how it ends up) - Benh (talk) 18:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Pixelpeeperism.   • Richard • [®] • 20:33, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Carefulreviewism. Why not trying to address the issue instead of counter criticising ? - Benh (talk) 11:22, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas