User talk:Hobbyfotowiki

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hobbyfotowiki!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Creative Commons-Bildlizenzen

Hallo Hobbyfotowiki,
ich habe gesehen, dass du deine Bilder häufig mit der Lizenz CC-Zero hochlädst.
Davon würde ich abraten. In der Regel wird aktuell auf Commons mit CC-by-sa-4.0 lizensiert. Das hat für den Fotografen den Vorteil, dass für andere Nutzer des Bildes bei Veröffentlichungen bestimmte Regeln eingehalten werden müssen, u.a. Namensnennung (hier Hobbyfotowiki) und Herkunft des Bildes (hier: Wikimedia Commons). Dennoch ist das Bild bei Einhaltung dieser Regeln für jedermann nutzbar.
Die Verwendung der Lizenz CC-Zero entspricht aber 'CC0 1.0 Verzicht auf das Copyright' und damit gibst du sämtliche Rechte an deinem Bild ab. Grüße, --Vogelfreund (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Antwort von Hobbyfotowiki:

CC-Zero ist bewusst gewählt. Die Namensnennung hat für mich keine Bedeutung. Das einzige was mich stört, ist die kommerzielle Nutzung, die ich aber wohl mit keiner der Lizenzierungsarten ausschließen kann, weil sie bei immer erwähnt wird. Eine Überprüfung ist hier auch kaum praktikabel, mich ärgert aber bereits die expizite Nennung in der Lizenzbeschreibung. Ich sehe mich als reinen Hobbyfotograf, dem Public Domain sehr am Herzen liegt und akzeptiere die Nachteile, die für mich recht unbedeutend sind.

Mir würde einfach der Satz reichen, dass mein Bilder (die ohnehin keine Profiqualität erreichen) frei verfügbar sind...

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosaflamingo (juvenil).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juveniler Rosaflamingo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe you could lower the highlights a bit. The drop of water is gorgeous! --Basotxerri 20:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The juvenile greater flamingo.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The juvenile greater flamingo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sylvia atricapilla heineken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:23, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Danke

Vielen herzlichen Dank für das Hochladen deiner schönen Fotos hier. Ich war vor zwei Jahren das letzte Mal auf Amrum im Urlaub und erinnere mich noch gerne an die Vielfalt der unterschiedlichen Arten. Ich finde es auch klasse, dass Du deine Fotos bei den Exzellenten Bildern hier nominierst – solltest Du einmal Hilfe dabei benötigen, lass mich das einfach wissen. Herzliche Grüße von einem gebürtigen Norddeutschen, den es 2008 nach Kalifornien verschlagen hat --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Alternative version to your Rotdrossel photo

Hi, I just uploaded this version of your nominated picture. If you like it, you may want to put it as an alternative into your nomination. Most of the users didn't like the top crop - if that's the only issue, you may have a better chance with my version of your file. If you don't know how to put an alternative version, I can do it if you agree. Greetings, --Podzemnik (talk) 20:50, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Northern Gannet with nest material.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Northern Gannet with nest material.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dreizehenmöwe im Flug.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dreizehenmöwe im Flug.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Hobbyfotowiki - could you add locations of where you took these photos to their descriptions, please? File:Sepiasturmtaucher.jpg, File:Rock Bunting (Cochem).jpg, File:Juveniler Seeadler.jpg, File:Knutt.jpg, File:Regulus madeirensis.jpg. Danke! - MPF (talk) 11:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Kategorien

Hallo Hobbyfotowiki, du hast hier die Kategorie Category:Morus bassanus ergänzt. Das ist nicht sinvoll, weil die bereits vorhandene Kategorie Category:Morus bassanus in flight eine Unterkategorie von 'Morus bassanus' ist. Auf gut deutsch: Alle Bilder, die 'Basstölpel im Flug' zeigen, zeigen gleichzeitig auch „normale“ Basstölpel. Alle Bilder, die in einer Unterkategorie enthalten sind, sind also auch automatisch in den übergeordneten Kategorien vertreten. Es wird in der Regel nur die unterste(=speziellste) Kategorie eingetragen. Das bedeutet, dass dieses Bild dann z.B. automatisch Mitglied der Über-Über-Über-Kategorie Category:Birds ist. Ich hoffe, dass dir das beim Verständnis der manchmal etwas heiklen Kategorisierung hilft. Gruß, --Vogelfreund (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eurasian oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 13:44, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The dunnock (Prunella modularis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, very sharp --Michielverbeek 21:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC) I have got no idea which mistake I made --Michielverbeek 06:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment Several entries in the candidates list were damaged. I have tried to fix this. I guess that there is a bug in the QIVOter helper gadget which sometimes causes these errors. --Aristeas 07:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Amazing photos!

Just wanted to compliment you. :-) Jason Quinn (talk) 01:08, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the nice comment! 2A02:908:F25:46C0:0:0:0:2599 20:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)