User talk:MJJR/archive 2008

User talk:MJJR - ARCHIVE 2008

POTY Competition

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that become a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Neuenstein Schloss

Hello MJJR, thank you for assessing Image:Neuenstein Schloss01 crop1 2007-09-22.jpg in QIC. Deplorably someone uploaded a modified version under the same name, which I feel invalidates an original assessment. I have decided to revert the change (the modified file can now be seen under a different name Image:Neuenstein Schloss01 crop1edit1 2007-09-22.jpg), and moved the case into the CR section. -- Klaus with K 16:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Haan Duinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenberge Oosterstaketsel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Quad Flandria.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Quad Flandria.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Mywood 11:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

What do you think ...

about this ? --Richard Bartz 20:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marsa Alam R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Pudelek 09:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marsa Alam R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent composition. --Thegreenj 01:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marsa Alam R15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition, nice view --Pudelek 08:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marsa Alam R10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Story-telling. What happend to that yacht? --Ikiwaner 21:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC) -- I don't know exactly. A lack of steersmanship during a stormy day, I presume. The wreck seemed to be there since a while... BTW: thanks for promoting this picture! -- MJJR 16:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

New camera

• Merci bien de tes commentaires, Marc (c'est bon de pouvoir parler le français de temps en temps...). Oui, je suis un peu sévère mais ce n'est jamais personnelle et je tente d'être toujours constructif dans mes critiques. Moi aussi j'appartiens à la vieille école, tout ce que je sais de la photographie numérique je l'ait appris ici! J'ai commencé à FPC il y a à peu près une année et demi, et j'était pas três bien reçu... Salut! -- Alvesgaspar 15:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marsa Alam R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Oppose A bit better than the other one. But still an empty picture. --Ikiwaner 22:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)  Support ?? Are you blind? There are 100s of dead Civil War Generals and several of them have (if you please) "for lease signs" stuck on them. -- carol 22:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)  Support Nothing wrong with this picture, unless that it is a little too dark, but the content is perfectly fine. Ram-Man 03:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)  Oppose Not sharp enough! --Manco Capac 07:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)  Support good -Pudelek 18:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Result: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> promoted -- carol 20:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marsa Alam R14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No noise in this water, the boats and the stuff on the beach kind of ruin the image unless it is a photograph that shows the trash that the boaters left.... -- carol 07:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid Palacio Velasquez R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Acceptable quality. --Dschwen 15:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid Atocha R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Did you erase that mans face? -- carol 22:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC), I guess it was the stupid camera noise-reduction (a.k.a. detail-reduction). --Dschwen 15:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC) -- I did not erase that face at all: I guess it's simply the head of a blonde lady seen from the back. Please consider the whole image, and not a detail of 0,01% -- MJJR 19:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC) I am not going to promote or decline this -- right now, all I can do is look at the '0,01%'. Hair pulled back with a tie on another person, very clear. Stripes of pattern on a shirt near by, almost clear. It is the front of a person (easy discerned from the details of the body and stance) and there should be more detail on the face instead of smudges. It is all I can see, so no decision from me. -- carol 15:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Mediocre technical quality, but large size and good composition makes a borderline QI. Thegreenj 14:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torres Colon R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight barrel distortion (should be corrected)! Overall quality is satisfactory though. --Dschwen 14:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huy Saint Mengold R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Week Support Nice composition what with careful considered, but I wonder what main subject is either church or street, without a mention. Could you have intention to croppout to the left building? _Fukutaro 13:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC) -- I don't think the cropping of the left building would improve the quality of the composition. But you are right: the street is part of the subject. I added the street name in the caption and in the image description. -- MJJR 20:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC), Yeah, I like the framing as it is. --Dschwen 21:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huy Maison R01 edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image has a good quality IMO--Mbz1 03:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namur Grande Garde R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Simonizer 22:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingooigem Countryside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition good; photograph is timeless if not for the contrail and the symmetry of the rows. -- carol 00:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namur Pont de Jambes R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is almost too white. -- carol 15:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namur Citadelle R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Graffiti, half a person and a way out for the soldiers? -- carol 16:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huy Fort R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unusual perspective makes it less boring. How long did they live in these buildings? -- carol 15:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC) -- I suppose that soldiers stayed there for short times only. At least I hope so - for them... (BTW: thanks for promoting). -- MJJR 16:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC) ((If it means anything to you, I laughed a lot the first time I saw it and its companion pic....)) -- carol 13:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huy HdV R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oedelem Ten Torre R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. Barabas 01:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Remy Mausoleum R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is fine. Barabas 01:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarascon Castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok 4 QI --Berthold Werner 13:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knotwilgen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 18:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namur Sambre R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The duck is blown !!1!!eleven. Still QI for me. --Dschwen 14:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid Plaza Oriente R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Despite some noise in the sky an overall QI. --Dschwen 14:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Madrid R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit complicated composition because it be seen historic? building in front, but enough to QI. _Fukutaro 14:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Remy Les Antiques R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mazagon Lighthouse R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the nearly quadratic crop. --Ikiwaner 10:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station Westrozebeke R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. --AFBorchert 09:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Binnenschip Maastricht R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knokkebrug R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and colors. Good work. --LC-de 10:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knokkebrug R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments not perfect, but good composition, natural colours --Mbdortmund 16:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seinhuis Brugge R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, good colors --Lucarelli 23:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gent Sint Pieters R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 06:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Faro Igreja do Carmo.jpg

Hallo, ich wollte Dich darauf hinweisen, dass Dein Bild Image:Faro Igreja do Carmo.jpg in der deutschen Wikipedia unter de:Wikipedia:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder vorgeschlagen worden ist. Bei der Gelegenheit habe ich gesehen, dass Du eine große Zahl sehr guter Bilder hochgeladen hast. Bravo! Viele Grüße --wau > 22:07, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gent Belfort R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it's better now. --Eusebius 21:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houthulst Begraafplaats R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's nothing wrong with it. --Massimo Catarinella 15:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preiveld R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Enough to QI. But in case of like this subject, sideways composition is more suitable, I guess. _Fukutaro 11:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Picture of the Year/2008/Preparation

We are starting the discussion on POTY 2008. Would you like to join? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sint Janshuismolen R01.jpg

Vooral het vrijende koppeltje op de voorgrond is schitterend! Ge vraagt u af waarom de wieken als de hollandse vlag geschilderd zijn, toch? --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spa Casino R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good enough --Pudelek 13:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spa Belvedere R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A bit of CA, but does not warrant an oppose IMO. --Dschwen 20:45, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spa Pouhon PLG R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well done. --Stevenfruitsmaak 19:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint Janshuismolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --LC-de 23:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spa Casino R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wish it were a bit crisper and that it had some more sky, but I think it's good. Dori 02:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spa Tourisme R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks good to me. Dori 02:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spa Lac Warfaaz R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's OK. --Lestath 19:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spa Museum R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mbdortmund 21:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drijvende Bok Norma R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments seems to be better now --Mbdortmund 00:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huis KdeStoutelaan R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Berthold Werner 17:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Spoorbrug R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp,good exposure. Vassil 15:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spa Saint Remacle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some minor CA and noise, but it's good. Dori 05:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Bloemmolens R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good light and composition. --Kosiarz-PL 07:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Raising the bar

Hi Marc,

You might want take a look at this discussion -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cavanilles R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 17:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinai R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good detail --Mbdortmund 23:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Hights R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition and colors look fine to me. --AFBorchert 22:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katharinaklooster R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems there are unavoidable problems with overexposed parts in this areas, but for me it's QI --Berthold Werner 12:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Hights R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mbdortmund 11:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, uncommon subject. But your low camera quality makes this a hard decisson. --Dschwen 15:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights R07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, uncommon subject. But your low camera quality makes this a hard decisson. --Dschwen 15:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostende Hundius R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp, good colors, lighting and exposition. --Florian Prischl 17:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights Marina R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Hights R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition, but it is a bit tilted to the right --Mbdortmund 11:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC) --  Done Tilt corrected - MJJR 20:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Hum, I think first version was better! I see it tilted to the left now, although the wall in the middle of the picture appears vertical on the first version. --Eusebius 08:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC) -- You may be right. It is rather difficult tot properly correct the distortions. I returned to the first version. - MJJR 21:37, 13 December 2008 (UTC)  Support I think it's better as it is now. --Eusebius 21:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenduine beach R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it a lot. Very nice dernier terrain vague. Nice light and colours. Maybe DOF could be deeper, but it suits the atmosphere. --Eusebius 11:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. A little bit noisy, but ok for a QI. --Eusebius 10:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights R08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Pudelek 16:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights TTC R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments high quality - Pudelek 16:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights Sofitel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Pudelek 16:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights R10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition saves the day. Je hebt dringend een nieuwe camera nodig (met nieuwjaar misschien?) ;-).Lycaon 07:28, 19 December 2008 (UTC) -- Kreeg intussen een D90 van de Sint :-)) -- MJJR 20:13, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights Hyatt R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Its a bit not enough sharpness that may be caused by C/A, however, proper composition to this subject, I think enough to QI. _Fukutaro 17:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Saint-Gilles-du-Gard Abbatiale

Hi,

File:Saint-Gilles-du-Gard Abbatiale 01.jpg has no Image ...--Sarkana _{frag den ℑ Vampir} 18:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Haan duinen R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Lycaon 18:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)