User talk:Pauk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Pauk!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Pay attention to copyright Image:Nakhodka gulf space.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JeremyA 04:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Image:Nakhodka panorama summer source.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 09:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Всё верно, это бот глючит. --Pauk 02:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

File:Oak Branch in Autumn.JPG[edit]

Do you have a location where this photo was taken, please? I am trying to identify the oak. Thanks! [Google перевод] У вас есть место, где эта фотография была сделана, пожалуйста? Я пытаюсь определить дуба. Спасибо! - MPF (talk) 21:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Большое спасибо! I would agree with Q. mongolica - MPF (talk) 00:00, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Historical Data about Notable Places in Byelorussia 214-215.png[edit]

Вы не могли бы перед тем, как удалять описание изображения, скачать файл и проверить, что там что-то есть? Всё-таки лучше исправить создание миниатюр в MediaWiki, тем более, что когда-то всё работало... --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Да, ошибся немного. :) Думал, файл повреждён. А нет ли смысла уменьшить? --Pauk (talk) 02:26, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

File:I am pauk.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Не гони. Это мои фотки. --Pauk (talk) 11:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Potd 2009-02-02[edit]

Hi Pauk! It seems that you nominated File:Pair of scrub wrens444.jpg to be Potd for 2009-02-02. But this is not a featured picture, so its is not eligible to be Potd. --Rotkraut (talk) 15:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I confused File:Scrub wren female Vocalising444.jpg. Please, change for other file. --Pauk (talk) 04:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
No prob, Ö did chose another one in the meanwhile. --Rotkraut (talk) 09:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Autumn in South Sikhote-Alin.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Не гони. --Pauk (talk) 13:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Bark of korean pine.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 14:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Bridge and Narragansett Bay.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot (talk) 00:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Autoroad in Vrangel was damaged by typhoon, Summer 2008.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 11:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Pauk!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:20, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Your votes for POTY[edit]

Hi Pauk. You could vote only for one image in the final round. Could you please select this one and strike out your votes from the others. Thanks.Перевод комментариев: Вы можете проголосовать за одно только изображение. Вы можете вернуться назад и вычеркнуть все, кроме одного вашего голоса?--Mbz1 (talk) 03:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Freeflyer nasa big.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Freeflyer nasa big.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Freeflyer nasa big.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Panther (talk) 07:26, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


File:Monument_on_the_top_of_Mound_of_Slory.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Monument_on_the_top_of_Mound_of_Slory.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token b273aeea683f79b883cea1df5f10873c[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token a2d6d3f0abff7564824fc41a8dc4beb3[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Problem[edit]

Hi, I was looking at Special:Newpages and noticed that some files you uploaded yesterday don't contain an image! e.g. File:Orange_and_twirly.jpg and File:Slack-jawed flower.jpg. I guess that there is a problem with the upload bot... thought you should know. Smartse (talk) 23:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:Flickr_upload_bot, ah you already realised. Smartse (talk) 23:38, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


File:Trochilus polytmus stamp 10.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Trochilus polytmus stamp 10.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Ww2censor (talk) 02:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Poloz Snake.jpg[edit]

I guess, it is Elaphe dione on the picture not Elaphe schrenckii, please check. --Arkhivov (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

  • May be. :) --Pauk (talk) 05:44, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Your recent uploads/edits concerning Category:Rivers of India etc.: Categorizing - the "bad" and maybe the "good" way to do[edit]

Hi, please do not categorize (some examples of your recent activities):

1) Category:Rivers of India or/and
2) Category:Bridges in India or/and
3) Category:Lakes of India etc.etc.

Please save time and capacity on commons by categorizing:

1) Category:Rivers of NAME_of_the_STATE - for example Category:Rivers of Jammu and Kashmir or (better) Category:NAME_of_the_RIVER
2) Category:Bridges in NAME_of_the_STATE [ref. Category:Bridges in India by state] or sometimes the name of a specific bridge
3) Category:Lakes of NAME_of_the_STATE - for example Category:Lakes of Jammu and Kashmir or (better), for example, Category:Tsomoriri or Category:Dal Lake, two well-known lakes in Jammu and Kashmir you prepared flickr-uploads, too.

Please use as far as possible the category of the regarding city/town/village respectively state in India, and, do not add the - not specific enough - categories as of "xxx of/in India".

Thank you for your assistance, Roland zh 05:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


PS: Please be so kind/co-operative to re-categorize, estimated to be 20 flickr-uploads within one day "prepared" by you as above mentionned ("xxx of/in India") ...

Please don't be intimidated, by Roland. Though categories are import to find pictures they are not mandatory, rather nice to have. If the categories you add are not "specific" enough in somebody elses view, you should not take this personally. If that person has a problem he should fix it. Cheers --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 10:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


Russification of Tanzania map[edit]

Пожалуйста, обратите внимание: на русифицированной Вами карте Танзании есть ошибка: населённый пункт "Шинъянга" по-русски пишется как "Шиньянга", т. е. не через Ъ, а через Ь. См. здесь [1]Radziun (talk) 09:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

  • Возможно. Правьте смело. :) Но я видел множество африканских названий именно с твёрдым знаком. --Pauk (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)


Category:Plantae[edit]

Hi Pauk, please note that Category:Plantae is NOT the right place to leave uploaded images. For many (most common) plant species there are already species categories that should be used. For unidentified plants please use Category:Unidentified plants. I suggest to make yourself familiar with the Commons category system before you upload more images into improper categories. -- Ies (talk) 18:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

File:T64 21.jpg[edit]

Руслан Владимирович, хочу сообщить Вам, что данная правка [2] нарушает закон РФ об авторских и смежных правах (и правила данного проекта тоже). Поэтому прошу Вас в качестве жеста доброй воли отменить данную правку. В случае отказа прошу электронной почтой на адрес chobitok@gmail.com сообщить Ваши паспортные данные, почтовый адрес и почтовый адрес ближайшего к Вам местного суда общей юрисдикции. Более подробно моё мнение по вопросу Вы сможете прочесть на моей странице обсуждения. --Чобиток Василий (talk) 08:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

  • Не надо смешить народ и ставить себя в смешное положение. --Pauk (talk) 09:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
    • Не откажите в моей просьбе. Потом вместе посмеёмся. --Чобиток Василий (talk) 09:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
      • Не надо баловаться с Законом. Система сильней. --Pauk (talk) 10:55, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
        • Руслан Владимирович, за свои поступки надо отвечать. Если система сильнее, она Вам поможет, а мои требования незаконны. Сообщите, пожалуйста, требуемую информацию, пройдет время, Вас пригласят, и Вы популярно объясните суду, что законы РФ и Украины об авторских правах в пролёте, поскольку Вам дана индульгенция на нарушение Закона рекомендациями некоего проекта. --Чобиток Василий (talk) 11:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
          • Раз незаконны требования, то нечего их и выставлять на посмешище. При загрузке файла выдаётся соглашение, с каким надо согласиться. --Pauk (talk) 12:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
            • Русский для Вас неродной? Повторяю: "Если... мои требования незаконны". 1) Я сюда это фото не загружал. 2) Фото сюда было закружено с подписью копирайта. Повторю спокойно мои тезисы:
              1. Фото изначально загружено сюда с подписью копирайта.
              2. Подпись на фотографии и лицензия на её использование - разные, взаимонезависимые вещи. В соответствии с лицензией любой может вносить любые правки, но лицензия, при этом, не освобождает от соблюдения других законов. Лицензия не отменяет действие закона.
              3. Законы об авторских правах запрещают удаление копирайтов, поэтому, удаление копирайта ретушью фотографии - нарушение закона.
              4. Видя нарушение закона, я пытался это нарушение устранить.
              5. Правила проекта, на которые ссылалась свора набросившихся откатывать мои правки, требуют попросить у фотографа фотографию без копирайтов. У автора фотографии никто ничего не спрашивал.
              6. Я иду навстречу и даю обещание на моей странице обсуждения, что в случае прекращения криминальных действий, нарушающих Закон, отсканирую плёнку и загружу эту фотографию в лучшем качестве и без копирайтов.
              7. После этого Вы присоединяетесь к травле автора, откатываете, а статья блокируется на варианте, полученном незаконным путем.
            • Подскажите, после выше сказанного, какие иные у меня есть способы предотвратить нарушение закона, как не в судебном порядке? Ведь Вы и Ваши подельники неверно применяете не только нормы закона, но и даже сами правила этого проекта, на которые ссылаетесь.
            • Поэтому Вам остаётся: 1) понять и исправить свою ошибку в рамках проекта или, если уверены в собственной правоте, 2) довериться органам, отвечающим за соблюдение закона. Третий вариант возможен, но только если Вы не созрели как мужчина, чтобы отвечать за собственные поступки.
            • P.S. Со столь экстравагантной просьбой я обратился именно к Вам, т.к. Вы - последний и Вас не остановил даже такой комментарий: "Who crop the caption? Where is request for photographer? Don't return criminal version!" --Чобиток Василий (talk) 13:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Translation[edit]

Is russian native for you? I repeat "If... my demands are illegal"

  1. I did not upload this photo here
  2. Photo was uploaded here with a copyright sign

I will once again repeat my theses:

  1. Photo was uploaded here with a copyright sign in the first place
  2. Watermark on this photo and the licence for it's usage are different things that are not connected with each other. Licence gives the right to apply any changes, but it does not give the right to break the law.
  3. Copyright act prohibits copyright sign removal, that is why retouching the photo to remove the sign is a violation.
  4. I witnessed a deliberate act of breaking the law and was trying to dispose of this flagrant violation.
  5. The people trying to gang up on me advanced with an argument that my action violated the rules. Those rules state "someone should ask a photographer to provide a photo without copyright watermarks" Not a single person asked for it.
  6. I am willing to cooperate and I promise on my "discussion page" that if my request is fulfiled I will scan the film and upload a better quality photo without a copyright sign.
  7. After that you join those who are harassing the author, revert changes and the page is being blocked as a an illegal one.

Taking into consideration all the details mentioned above let me ask you a question. Are there any other ways except for judicial review i can use to dispose of this flagrant violation? Because you and your accomplices apply the laws and the rules of the project incorrectly

All you have to do is 1) conceive that you are wrong and correct the mistake or if you are so sure of your righteousness 2) let the specific committee take the control and decide. There's also another way but that is applicable only if you are not mature enough to take responsibility

P.S. The reason i'm adressing you specifically with such an extravagant statement is because you were the last and you did not stop even thought there is a comment that says "Who crop the caption? Where is request for photographer? Don't return criminal version!" --Чобиток Василий (talk) 13:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC) (Александр Мотин (talk) 16:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC))

File:T64_21.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:T64_21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard the Bard 19:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Categorising media[edit]

Your recent uploads to Category:Chiang Mai have been recategorised in to their specific categories. Would you be so kind to do that yourself next time? - Takeaway (talk) 23:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Sark[edit]

Thanks for the categorisation re: Sark images! Man vyi (talk) 23:17, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Can you identify this island?[edit]

Can you identify this island (-> File:Toh Ko Bay Panorama.jpg) which you apparently have categorised as being "Ko Toh"? There is no Ko Toh in Thailand so which island might it be? - Takeaway (talk) 11:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

  • Ko Lanta? --Pauk (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
    • Why would you think that the image is of Koh Lanta? There does not seem to be any indication at all that it is Koh Lanta. - Takeaway (talk) 03:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
      • I discovered where that photo was made. I typed in "Tok Ko" in to google and it immediately came up with the island Koh Phi Phi. So it was not on the non-existing island "Ko Toh", nor was it on "Koh Lanta" (I still wonder why you decided that the picture must have been made there...) but on Koh Phi Phi. Just a few seconds on google would have given you the answer too, so you too would have been able to categorise your upload correctly. - Takeaway (talk) 08:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Can you identify this "plant"?[edit]

You have uploaded File:Lfy framed.jpg in to Category:Plants and Category:Berries. Could you identify this plant? Both these categories are actually only supposed to contain subcategories and not have any files directly placed in to them except those which are appropriate. You can see that in "Category:Plants", your recent upload is the only image file there, the 4 other files are audio files on how to pronounce the word "plant". "Category:Berries" should actually also be cleaned up some time soon as it has attracted a lot of image files from people who have no idea either of what they are uploading or just can't be bothered to place it in a correct category. - Takeaway (talk) 08:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

  • It's Grape, vine. But I don't know breed/species. ;) --Pauk (talk) 10:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
    • Nice to see that you have moved it to the category for grapes instead of "Category:Plants". - Takeaway (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Can you identify the location of this mill?[edit]

You have uploaded File:Mill Flanders.jpg but it remains uncategorised. Do you know in which locality this photo was taken? - Takeaway (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

  • It's Mill in Lubbeek, Flemish Brabant near Bruxelle. --Pauk (talk) 10:22, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
    • Perhaps you could have added in the category yourself if it was that simple? - Takeaway (talk) 17:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

File:KamazFromVladivostok.jpg[edit]

Hello Pauk!

Is this file your own work? Are you the photographer/author of this file? If yes, please insert {{own}} as source instead of "Samsung Digimax A502".

Thanks in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 08:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

  • It's my work made by my old camere Samsung Digimax A502. :) --Pauk (talk) 09:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, good, insert {{own}} as source (at all of your images) to make clear that your uploaded photographs are made by you. Giving "Samsung Digimax A502" as source is not sufficient, the images can be deleted due to the missing of a source. Please correct that error of all your file. Thank you. --High Contrast (talk) 09:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Olsztyn_at_bird_eye.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Olsztyn_at_bird_eye.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Justass (talk) 12:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

4987a05da630c8c487ec3e49664e3dd3

TUSC token 13ef9e66aa110b1a53a8bea8092f3741[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

permission to use your picture, ST_MRE~1, of Sainte Mere Eglise[edit]

Dear Paul, My father is publishing a small book of his memoirs (in the US). It will have a small circulation (<200) since it is mainly of interest to his family and friends. He is an old navy man and a history buff. He admires the picture of Sainte Mere Eglise that you posted on Wikimedia and would like to use it in his book. It would appear inside the book. I want to check if it is OK that he use the photo. If it is, how would you like to be credited? Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Dorine Starace 74.105.161.176 15:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

  • I am not Paul. :) --Pauk (talk) 22:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

permission to use your picture, ST_MRE~1, of Sainte Mere Eglise[edit]

Forgive me Pauk. Was a typo not an assumption (k and l are next to each other on keyboard. You can contact me at dorines@gmail.com as well. Sincerely, Dorine S

  • Everybody can use picture by its license. --Pauk (talk) 22:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Pauk, THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPLY. Best Regards, Dorine 74.105.161.176 13:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Image:Basilique de notre dame de la paix.jpg[edit]

I have deleted the above image- the exact same file has already been uploaded and deleted from Commons. There is no freedom of panorama in the Ivory Coast, meaning that images like this of modern buildings must be considered non-free, in the same way scans of artwork must be considered non-free derivative works. If you have uploaded any similar images, it would be very helpful if you would tag them for deletion. If you have any questions, I am reachable on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 19:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Flickr uploads[edit]

Hi Pauk - saw you'd uploaded a couple of pics of birds on gravestones with Flickr upload bot - unfortunately that bot doesn't pick up a lot of the information (notably locations) off the Flickr page. Have you tried the new Flinfo tool for Flickr uploads? You just put the Flickr photo number (e.g. 796477306 ) in the box, and the bot does most of the rest for you, picking up most of the information automatically. Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Would you know what plant it is that you have uploaded?[edit]

You have uploaded File:Oregano growing on the beach.jpg under Category:Plants which seems a bit much for just one plant. Would you happen to know what plant it is which you have uploaded and would you be so kind to categorise it correctly? - Takeaway (talk) 17:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Same request with File:Monarch on Oregano.jpg which you categories under Category:Plantae. - Takeaway (talk) 17:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

And this one -File:Ancora il mio amore, Echinopsis oxygona.jpg- which you have put under Category:Flowers. - Takeaway (talk) 17:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps you could also look at File:Passeggiata pomeridiana.jpg too which you have also put under Category:Flowers? - Takeaway (talk) 17:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

And here are a few others which you have uploaded and which should be fairly simple to categorise instead of just putting them all in to Category:Flowers --> File:Bauhinia blakeana (Hong Kong Orchid Tree).jpg, File:Beach Hibiscus flowering tree.jpg, File:Bleuet cornflower.jpg and File:Clivia clivia.jpg. - Takeaway (talk) 19:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Locations[edit]

Why are you refusing to add the location data from Flickr uploads where it exists? This is one of the most important aspects of photos added to wiki commons. - MPF (talk) 11:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Locations, Locations, Locations[edit]

You've done it again . . . File:Long Tail bird.jpg. The identity and location are clearly indicated in the Flickr original. So why did you not add them, and then place it in Category:Unidentified birds? You are just creating extra work for other editors to tidy up your neglect. If you're going to upload phots, please do so properly. Thank you. - MPF (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Causing edit conflicts[edit]

I note that you added a category to an image in the same minute that I uploaded the image. Please leave it for at least 10 minutes and preferably 30 mins to let the editor doing the uploading finish what he or she is doing. I was just preparing to add a category for the bird species, and you caused me extra work, because I had to remove the category Birds that you added. Snowmanradio (talk) 11:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

OK. :) --Pauk (talk) 11:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

LOCATIONS[edit]

Most of the Flickr photos you are uploading include location information. Why are you consistently refusing to add this important data?

Also, please place images in their correct species categories, not in main categories like Category:Birds, which should not contain any files. Please read Commons:Categories for guidelines.

(Google Перевод) Большинство фотографий Flickr вы загружаете включать информацию о местоположении. Почему вы последовательно отказывается добавить эту важную информацию?

Кроме того, следует размещать изображения в их правильной категории вида, не в основных категорий, таких как Категория:Птицы, которая не должна содержать какие-либо файлы. Пожалуйста, прочтите Commons: Categories принципов. MPF (talk) 10:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

  • My knowledge of ornithology (and other biology) is a bad. I am not sure in correct species... --Pauk (talk) 10:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
OK thanks! At least, when a scientific name is given by the Flickr user (e.g. here), please use this as the category - most times, it is correct (there are occasional misidentifications, that can be corrected later). Also, it is a lot better if you can use the Flinfo tool for Flickr uploads, it manages the Flickr information better than the flickr upload bot. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
(Google Перевод) ОК спасибо! По крайней мере, когда научное имя задается пользователем Flickr (например, здесь), пожалуйста, используйте эту категорию - самый раз, это правильно (есть иногда ошибочны, которые могут быть исправлены позже). Кроме того, это гораздо лучше, если Вы можете использовать Flinfo Tool для добавления Flickr, она управляет информацией Flickr лучше Flickr Bot загрузки. Спасибо! - MPF (talk) 11:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Fort Popham Maine 2009.jpg[edit]

When you do the sort of recat you did yesterday to this file, please be sure to leave User cats such as Category:NRHP site pictures by User:Jameslwoodward with the file. Do not move them to the new category or erase them. For those of us who upload a lot of images they are very convenient. Thanks, . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 18:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


Your flickr uploads of March 17, 2010: Categorisation and please avoid to overwhelm Category:Churches in Switzerland, Category:Mountains of Switzerland, Category:Valleys of Switzerland etc.etc.[edit]

Hi, please do not categorize flickr uploads (an example of your recent activity):

Category:Windisch +
Category:Churches in Switzerland +
Category:1308 establishments +
Category:Monastery churches +
Category:1300s churches

Please save time and capacity on commons by categorizing:

Category:Königsfelden Abbey
BTW: Every Swiss canton (state) has a church-related category at least p.e. Category:Churches in the canton of Aargau, i.e. please avoid to overwhelm again Category:Churches in Switzerland respectively country-specific 'sub'-categories. btw2: In general, for most of known buildings (p.e. "Bundeshaus Bern") and so on, there are categories already created.
The same for Category:Mountains of Switzerland, Category:Valleys of Switzerland etc., please at least try to categorize more specific, p.e. Category:Pilatus for a relatively known mountain, or at least (p.e.) Category:Mountains in the canton of Bern and so on!

In general, once again, please use as far as possible the category of the regarding city/town/village or district (if there's no category), or, a localized better 'fitting' i.e. the 'most fitting"' category(ies), and, do not add - in addition - the categories of the city, state/canton etc. and country, too.

For further information on categories please read Commons:Categories referring to an accurate categorisation, simplifying your further uploads and categorisation in general. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the commons:help desk.

Thank you for your assistance, Roland 19:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

==> Please stop to categorize p.e. Category:xxx in Switzerland and try to categorize as above mentionned on March 11 and 17 and before ! <==
==> Please do not continue as before, now you start to overwhelm also Category:Rivers of Switzerland ... imho some kind of vandalism :=(( ==
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.56.162.147 (talk • contribs) Herzi Pinki (UTC)

Categories, again[edit]

I have just spent about four hours taking images out of Category:Churches and putting them into more specific categories. About a quarter of those images were your uploads from Flickr. If you are going to take images from Flickr, please make certain that you put them in an appropriate specific category. That is usually at one administrative level below country -- States in the USA and Germany, Cantons in Switzerland, Counties in the United Kingdom, and so forth. They can also go into other specific categories.

I see above that you have been told this before, both with respect to Churches and with respect to other things. There is rarely any reason to add an image to Commons if you don't know enough about it to add a specific category. General categories -- "Churches", "Birds", "Plants", and most other single word categories are never useful -- they just create work for the rest of us. Thank you. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 18:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Загрузка изображений с Фликра[edit]

Будьте добры, добавляйте по возможности к загружаемым с Фликра фотографиям метку "commons.wikimedia.org". Это позволяет избегать дублей. Я уже натыкался на подобные, когда Вы загружали на Склад мои фотографии вместе со мной. С уважением, и.М. И. Максим (talk) 20:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Неизвестный Отец[edit]

Здравствуйте. Вы убрали из описания файла File:Отец Протасьева С.Н.jpg шаблоны «Нет источника» и «Проверить категории». Между тем, к данному файлу, действительно, не указано никаких ссылок на источник. Более того, вообще неизвестно Протасьев ли это, Нестерович, или вообще какой-нибудь Плотский-Поцелуев — об этом нет ровно никакой достоверной информации. Соответственно, на данный момент нет и никакой возможности адекватно категоризировать это изображение, поскольку не известно, что за человек на нём запечатлён. Какой же смысл убирать шаблоны, будто бы никаких таких проблем не существует? -- Ivan Simochkin (talk) 17:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Источник был указан. Скан фотографии. Фото сделано до 1917 года - то есть махровое PD. А кто изображён - тема отдельного разговора. В любом случае никакое не быстрое. Если хочется - надо обсуждать. --Pauk (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
А, понятно. Только обсуждать, кто там изображён, не с кем: участница, загрузившая фото, много лет как забросила Википедию. Так он и останется неизвестным отцом :-) -- Ivan Simochkin (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Так пусть сообщество обсуждает. Наверняка будут авторитетные мнения. Поэтому при явном PD никак быстрое не подходит. Если есть желание - на обсуждене надо. --Pauk (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Palace_of_the_Parliament,_Casa_Poporului.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Palace_of_the_Parliament,_Casa_Poporului.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jorfer (talk) 03:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Church, Iceland.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Church, Iceland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Fingalo (talk) 18:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Information moved here. --Martin H. (talk) 14:09, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Monastery_of_the_Deposition_in_Suzdal,_Russia.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Monastery_of_the_Deposition_in_Suzdal,_Russia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ludvig14 (talk) 23:35, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:RIP Walter Cronkite.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:RIP Walter Cronkite.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hekerui (talk) 10:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Is there a reason you reverted without a comment? Hekerui (talk) 11:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
CC license in free license --Pauk (talk) 12:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
But the photo is not from the uploader on flickr, but from a press photographer. Please be careful in the future. Hekerui (talk) 12:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Crazy_Horse_Monument_Standing_Tall.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Crazy_Horse_Monument_Standing_Tall.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 15:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Just a couple of things here, Pauk. First, Kelly's tagging of this file as a copyright violation was not vandalism, as you claimed in your edit summary. Please don't make accusations like that. Secondly, don't attempt to sweep problems under the rug by removing legitimate problem tags from your own uploads without discussion. Thirdly, don't edit discussion archives that clearly state that you shouldn't edit them. LX (talk, contribs) 23:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
It is not a copyright violation. This image from Flickr has free license. Sorry, maybe it is not vandalism but be more carefully --Pauk (talk) 02:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
It is a copyright violation, because it depicts a non-free work. The Flickr user is not the copyright holder of the depicted work. Taking a photo of someone else's non-free work does not give the Flickr user the right to issue a license for the result. This was all explained in Commons:Deletion requests/Crazy Horse Memorial. LX (talk, contribs) 05:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Victoria_Osteen_at_Lakewood_Church,_Houston.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Victoria_Osteen_at_Lakewood_Church,_Houston.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

File:M-2137-car.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:M-2137-car.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Blacklake (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

File:12fd6ac12.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:12fd6ac12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Blacklake (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Eilean_Donan_castle_at_dusk.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eilean_Donan_castle_at_dusk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--  Docu  at 06:05, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

File:New_Iberia,_Louisiana.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:New_Iberia,_Louisiana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Berryqueen1 (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Samoa_money.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Samoa_money.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prince Kassad (talk) 16:19, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:1871 Campbell.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1871 Campbell.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:00, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File:SeedsofPeace.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SeedsofPeace.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 00:25, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:John_Isner_(USA).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:John_Isner_(USA).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Good twins (talk) 09:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Statecapital.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Statecapital.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Statecapital.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

No source files[edit]

Please refrain from removing {{no source since}} tags from files that do not bear a verifiable source. Doing so is considered highly disruptive and may result in a block. Consider this your only warning. -FASTILY (TALK) 19:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Statecapital.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Statecapital.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 19:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for a duration of 72 hours[edit]

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 72 hours for the following reason: Disruptive Editing. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-FASTILY (TALK) 06:23, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Why? You can say me my mistakes about sourses images? Please, unblocked me and say how I must write about source! I don't understand it. --Pauk (talk) 06:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I already told you above not to remove no-source tags from files which lack verifiable source information. A source such as "Reproduced from an original postcard published by the Detroit Photographic Company" is NOT a verifiable source. For all we know, you could have made this up! A good source must be verifiable by other editors, and the source information you have provided is inadequate in verifying the files' copyright status by third parties. You are blocked because you ignored my warning and continued to remove no-source deletion tags without addressing the concern noted by the tags. -FASTILY (TALK) 06:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Who must verified these postcard? I didn't uploaded its in enWiki. It done by other users. Please, See Categories: 19** postcards. There are very many postcards. There source is as Scan. Why you write "no sources" only in these eight postcard? Please, unblocked me. I badly understood about your message about source. Let other users verified. --Pauk (talk) 06:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I have unblocked you because you appear to be willing to discuss your no-source tag removals. Please refrain from removing deletion tags at this time. I invite you to discuss source verifiability at my talk when you're ready. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 08:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Essex_High_School.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Essex_High_School.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 09:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Kingston jamaica.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 23:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kingston jamaica.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kingston jamaica.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kingston jamaica.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 05:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

  • I moved this file from en-Wiki (there under free license) --Pauk (talk) 05:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Correction: there under a claim that it's freely licensed, but with no evidence of that actually being the case. If you look at the English Wikipedia uploader's talk page, you'll see lots of no permission notices, so it seems to be a recurring problem with the user's uploads. Please do not transfer such files to Commons. LX (talk, contribs) 06:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Brisbane_NASA.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brisbane_NASA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.106.229 06:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Krusevac_1933.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Krusevac_1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FASTILY (TALK) 23:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

File:SAC_Namibia-bushveld.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SAC_Namibia-bushveld.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FASTILY (TALK) 02:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

очень прошу[edit]

отвяжитесь от снимков с Храмом Вознесения Господня в Избище.Будте любезны.--Шенкел (talk) 09:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Чего? --Pauk (talk) 21:25, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

File:View_of_Piermont,_NH.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:View_of_Piermont,_NH.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FASTILY (TALK) 06:41, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Italy.cinque.terre.vernazza.01.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Italy.cinque.terre.vernazza.01.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:23, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Verdun_Beinhaus_von_Douaumont.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Verdun_Beinhaus_von_Douaumont.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Monika-Jagaciak.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Monika-Jagaciak.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 23:09, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Vlada-Roslyakova.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Vlada-Roslyakova.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 23:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Constance Jablonski.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Constance Jablonski.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 23:11, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Карповская церковь1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Карповская церковь1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Dmitry89 (talk) 07:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Please give images better names[edit]

Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | മലയാളം | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:To many sleepless nights.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.

Please give uploaded images meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the image is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the image itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

AzaToth 01:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please avoid watermarked pictures[edit]

Deutsch | English | español | हिन्दी | македонски | +/−


The image File:To many sleepless nights.jpg you uploaded contains watermarks. The usage of watermarks is discouraged according to policy. If a non-watermarked version of the image is available, please upload it under the same file name and then remove this template. After removing the watermark, ensure that the removed information is present in the EXIF tags, the image description page, or both.

Thank you for understanding.

AzaToth 01:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Vassian_of_Uglich.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vassian_of_Uglich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:47, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


File:St. Sergius of Radonezh.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St. Sergius of Radonezh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:I want to be your translator.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:I want to be your translator.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

El Grafo (talk) 17:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

File:MosqueDibbaAlHisn.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MosqueDibbaAlHisn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

File:British diver Tom Daley.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:British diver Tom Daley.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 02:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 21:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 12:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Ivatsevichi[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Ivatsevichi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Renessaince (talk) 20:13, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sun Ladder (talk) 15:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 23:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

File:1992 Ford Zig Concept Car.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1992 Ford Zig Concept Car.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

mr.choppers (talk)-en- 13:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 22:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

File:0 Verdun - Cemetery Douaumont (1) jpg[edit]

Dear Pauk,

I need your support again to help me to keep the image:0 Verdun - Cemetery Douaumont (1) jpg in Commons.

Despite the formal decision on maintaining this photograph in Commons following the six positive votes of the 7 September 2011 (including yours), the user:Eleassar ask again the deletion.

Can I ask again your help to maintain this photograph as de minimis in Commons.

Thank you in advance and best regards.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 19:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Stella in Livadia, Primorsky Krai.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stella in Livadia, Primorsky Krai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Worldfair.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Worldfair.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Labynkyr Lake.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Labynkyr Lake.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Labynkyr Lake.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove problem tags[edit]

Čeština | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Svenska | +/−


Nuvola apps important.svg Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Landscape near South Londonderry.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Landscape near South Londonderry.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Kletsky Zamok Old.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kletsky Zamok Old.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ghirlandajo (talk) 11:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014[edit]

WLE Austria Logo (no text).svg

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Trolleybus in Syzran, Russia.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Trolleybus in Syzran, Russia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ukexpat (talk) 19:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Geagea (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)