User talk:Tournasol7/Archive19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of the Rotorua Museum 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Severac-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saturnin Church of Saint-Saturnin-de-Lenne 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 6 in Naumburg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 13 in Naumburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevard Georges Juskiewenski in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcades Place Nationale in Montauban 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! -- Ikan Kekek 07:54, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 place de la Carriere in Nancy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanula barbata at Col de Joux Plane (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Peyreleau 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pointe de la Chavache, Pointe d'Ardens & Pointe des Follys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:02, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Platycodon grandiflorus in La Jaysinia (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:02, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White Cliffs in Pukearuhe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29 Rue Pasteur in Saint-Cere 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau d'Audiernes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Otorowo (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 28 in Lwowek (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 17:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the castle of Severac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 16:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Francois d'Estaing in Estaing 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 17:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vitus Church in Rogozno (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Otorowo (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Possible FP, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 12:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 28 in Lwowek (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collegiate in Szamotuly (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vitus Church in Rogozno (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Otorowo (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulica Jezuicka in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Rivet in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 19:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Milliarede in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 19:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 Place aux Herbes in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 1 rue des Foissants in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 10 rue d'Engueysse in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lausanne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Bourg in Aigle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lac de Roy 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lac de Roy 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 rue Paul-Foussat in Uzes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Presbytere de la cathedrale in Nimes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Sorry to write in English. Please can you look at File talk:Hygrophorus pudorinus in Haute-Savoie (1).jpg? I think that the identification of that mushroom is wrong. Best wishes, Strobilomyces (talk) 20:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Strobilomyces! How are you? Yes, you can change the categories. I'll do the rest. Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 13:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I am fine, thanks and I hope you are too. I made the changes. Strobilomyces (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thank you very much. I have requested the pages to be renamed. Tournasol7 (talk) 21:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Theodulos church in La-Tour-de-Peilz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GHood quality --Michielverbeek 07:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron ferrugineum at Col de Tavaneuse (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Geneva from Lavaux vineyard terraces 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Bourg in Aigle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but could be a bit brighter --PantheraLeo1359531 17:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collegiate in Szamotuly (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauser Gasse 19 in Wetzlar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torlesse Range 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte de Santa Luzia sanctuary in Viana do Castelo 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Bret 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The landscape hangs down to the left. Can you remove the hole in the sky on the right side? --Ermell 07:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 06:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better. Thanks. --Ermell 16:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Seysses (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice nativity scene and photo. -- Ikan Kekek 09:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Montriond 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Bellevaux 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Vailly (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Pniewy (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The top crop is a bit, padon me, rude :-) --Moroder 08:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vitus Church in Rogozno (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Pniewy (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Lwowek (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Martin and Nicholas cathedral in Bydgoszcz (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 14 in Szamotuly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lathyrus linifolius in Aveyron (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nossa Senhora do Pilar sanctuary 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Garnier de Mauriac in Ste-Eulalie-de-Cernon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau des Palanges (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice composition! --Scotch Mist 12:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Square de la Couronne in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality but please, fix the top right corner --Poco a poco 17:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained-glass window of the Cathedral of Nimes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:28, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keep in Capdenac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Sperie Church of Saint-Cere 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Misery 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Geneva from Lavaux vineyard terraces 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senecio fuchsii at Lac de Morgins (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Sainte-Catherine in Nancy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone cross in Arjac Aveyron 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road D22 near Nauviale 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Republique in Villefranche-de-Rouergue 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 03:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de la Chambre des deputes in Luxembourg City 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amans du Fort church in Aubin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Hotel Maury in Saint-Cere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Gerald abbey hospital in Aurillac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schillerplatz 8 in Wetzlar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gardon in Ales 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Martin and Nicholas cathedral in Bydgoszcz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. But I'd suggest a small cropping to the upper part, to improve composition and get rid of the most unsharp parts at the top (see my note). --Augustgeyler 16:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 11:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Improved! --Augustgeyler 22:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre-Dame-du-Puy church of Figeac 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Sisteron in Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirnitz of Wartburg Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Estaing 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Etang Majeur de Bassies 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Etangs de Bassies 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal Media Library in Villefranche-de-Rouergue 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Estaing 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karlstraße 1 in Eisenach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of O chapel in Porto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The verticals need to be corrected as well as some CA removed. --Ermell 08:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The walls of chapel aren't straight; see other buildings. --Tournasol7 12:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. You are right. Sorry. --Ermell 23:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau des Palanges (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin church in La Capelle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:41, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lot river in Banassac-Canilhac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Saint Bonitus church in St-Bonnet-de-Chirac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support It could use some more sharpening, but ok --Poco a poco 11:41, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road D900 near Marchastel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Ressouches 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 11:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domain of Grandlac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 11:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent church in Canilhac (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 15:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prunella grandiflora in Aveyron 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:55, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Annecy (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 place du ble in La Canourgue (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator of Chirac church in Monastier (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte Principale in Sainte-Eulalie-de-Cernon 01 (a).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Verticals should be corrected IMO --Ermell 07:44, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 09:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former town hall of Annecy (a).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could do with a bit more sharpness IMO --Ermell 07:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 09:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Brousse-le-Chateau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:33, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Marcel church in Saint-Marcel 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Muret-le-Chateau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 22:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meybille Bay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 16:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained-glass windows of the St Gerald abbey church of Aurillac 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 22:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21 rue du Château in La Canourgue (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI but it looks a bit washed out, I'd darken darker areas a bit (increasing contrast or decresing the brigthening you apply to the shadows, which for my taste is usually too much) --Poco a poco 14:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Marchastel Lozere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:55, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de Montferrand (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 rue Theodore-Jean in Marvejols (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Pont-de-Salars 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I now think it is too faint to be seen. Good quality therefore. Sorry for that. --Cayambe 10:49, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 14 rue Saint-Julien in Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:18, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in La Canourgue 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 12:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Marvejols 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 12:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Ressouches 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Motukiekie Beach 01 (a).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The horizon should be aligned --Ermell 21:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 11:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta Nigra in Trier (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Tournasol7! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Romanus church in Chirac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Marvejols.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 13:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bes river in Marchastel (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:32, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Marchastel (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in La Canourgue (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:36, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domain of Grandlac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Frezal chapel in Canourgue 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I assume it was a misty day. --Aristeas 17:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaufstrasse 24 in Weimar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

Hello Tournasol7,

thank you very much for all your pictures and contributions on Commons!
I wish you and your loved ones a Merry Christmas and a happy and healthy 2021.

All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 11:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bishop's palace in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Pity it's not centered but good quality --Podzemnik 10:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de l'Horloge in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:36, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 Plan de l'Aspic in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Marvejols 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. -- Liberaler Humanist 18:57, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

  * Merry Christmas 2020, Tournasol7! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   --Pierre André (talk) 10:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noël 2020[edit]

Merci de tes vœux Tournasol7. Reçois les miens en retour ! --Jebulon (talk) 11:04, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Je te remercie également, Tournasol, joyeux Noël et bonne 2021 à toi et à ta famille! Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! --Poco a poco (talk) 13:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remercîments[edit]

Je te remercie de tes vœux qui m'ont touchés. Je te souhait pour toi et ta famille des bonnes fêtes et une excellente année photographique 2012 --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:57, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/21![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2021, Krzysztof! *  
  • Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar!
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr!

   -- Dietmar, 25 December 2020

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaufstrasse 22 in Weimar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Villard in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19 Rue Doree in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de l'Academie in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Augustus in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Pin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained-glass window of the Cathedral of Nimes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 46 Boulevard Victor Hugo in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 23 Place du Faubourg in Najac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Droite in Rieupeyroux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:20, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine du Banneret in Payerne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aare in Solothurn (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obere Muehle in Aarau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epilobium angustifolium at Lac de Morgins (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau d'Audiernes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Belcastel 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. -- Liberaler Humanist 14:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahrstrasse 50 in Blankenheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, I suggest to crop out the image frame on the right sight and to center the door. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:46, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Claude la Colombière chapel in Paray-le-Monial (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:20, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pillory at Terreiro da Se in Porto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de Thuries (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 09:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 09:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Foggy day in Saint-Bonnet-de-Chirac (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. It’s always difficult to photograph fog ;–). The photo shows nice, realistically subdued colours and a nice arrangement. --Aristeas 11:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Chanac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin church in La Capelle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New year 2021[edit]

  * Happy New year 2021" Tournasol7! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

--Pierre André (talk) 10:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountaine aux dauphins Autoire 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Pierre André Leclercq 17:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collegiate Church of Saint Salvy in Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Canilhac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Haute-Savoie 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Salvaterra de Mino 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza del Risorgimento 27-44 in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holly Cross convent in Viana do Castelo 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine des Serruriers in Payerne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maruia Falls 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and nice. --Aristeas 14:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 14 in Naumburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vengolis 14:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Busqueilles 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vengolis 14:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 28 place de la Carriere in Nancy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vengolis 14:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Assumption church in Caminha 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Sabinus church in Monbrun 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Market hall in Cologne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Luc 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centaurea montana at Col de Joux Plane (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rua Conselheiro Lopes da Silva in Valenca (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:59, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Thomas church in Mur-de-Barrez 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City walls of La Cavalerie 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 07:00, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Matthew church in Laguiole 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Millau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Rotoroa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Peaceful and pleasant. -- Ikan Kekek 16:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Areosa fortress 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former presbytery in Laguiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfry in Millau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Notre-Dame-de-Laval de Peyrusse-le-Roc 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in La Couvertoirade 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Estaing 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and nice. --Aristeas 14:55, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Laurent in Salles-la-Source 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:50, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Arcanhac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cloister of Priory Saint-Michel of Grandmont (14).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cloister of Priory Saint-Michel of Grandmont (14).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orangery in Gotha (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Najac 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Alsfeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 Place du Bourg in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ueberwasserkirche in Muenster (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Tecklenburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Caussade 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shore of Firth of Thames 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortified Church of Inieres (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte du Caire in Pegairolles-de-l'Escalette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de France 2019 in Rodez (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weigh houses in Sauveterre-de-R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascade de Saunhac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 Grand Rue in Lodeve 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Soubes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collegiate Church of Saint Salvy in Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collegiate Church of Saint Salvy in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Albinhac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Lodevois 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness is very good. But please remove the leaves on the left and the spots in the sky. --Milseburg 19:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 09:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Milseburg 20:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taranaki Falls 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Tekapo 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 09:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Jagiellońska Street in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Takapou Bay 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wetzlarer Dom (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Rotorua in Rotorua 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Towers of the Naumburg Cathedral 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 10:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 22 Rue d'Oultres in Estaing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais Walderdorff in Trier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not really keen on that guy in front of the building but ok --Poco a poco 08:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolnosci Square 8-10 in Znin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Guglielmo Massaia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutherstrasse 2-4 in Eisenach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House Zinnen in Luxembourg City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of commune of Severac-le-Chateau 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rouleau de Bostan 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rouleau de Bostan 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schillerplatz 8 in Wetzlar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolnosci Square 8-10 in Znin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Vezins-de-Levezou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Church of Campagnac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Cyr-et-Sainte-Julitte de Canac 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be QI. --PetarM 22:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flower of Cistus monspeliensis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Auberoques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 10:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Apolda 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Alzette river in Luxembourg City 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Eisenach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Ducal Palace in Luxembourg City 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks a bit underexposed to me and can you please get rid of the wall on the right? --Poco a poco 08:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 09:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tournasol7/Archive19, your image cannot show Cistus monspeliensis because of its compound leaves. Cistus monspeliensis, a species I have not found so far, is supposed to have entire leaves. Therefore, I assume that this image shows some variety of Dasiphora fruticosa (= Potentilla fruticosa) with white flowers. I changed the ID, but the image needs to be renamed. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 22:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert Flogaus-Faust. Thank you for your checking. You are right. I asked for a file name change. Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 10:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Philippe-II in Luxembourg City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Apolda 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Florian church in Znin 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Virgin Mary Queen of Poland church in Znin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:10, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residenzhaus in Eisenach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spots (3-4) on the left, near the building roof. --Jakubhal 13:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 09:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herderplatz 2 in Weimar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domplatz 8 in Wetzlar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Weimar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotes Schloss in Weimar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great hall of Wartburg Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall tower in Znin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 10:21, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 33.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 33.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Place de Clairefontaine in Luxembourg City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erfurter Strasse 50 in Weimar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Anne church in Eisenach (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergfried of Wartburg Castle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jana Pawła II Place in Więcbork 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tribunale de la Jeunesse in Luxembourg City 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Alzette river in Luxembourg City 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markt 3 in Naumburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dietrichstrasse 52 in Trier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotes Schloss in Weimar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments After looking at some other pictures of this building, I conclude that the verticals are straight in this image. -- Liberaler Humanist 12:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goldschmiedenstrasse 1 in Eisenach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Weimar (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rittergasse 3 in Eisenach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --ADARSHluck 13:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Towers of the Naumburg Cathedral 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --ADARSHluck 13:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergfried of Wartburg Castle (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --ADARSHluck 13:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain on Marienplatz in Naumburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de Colomb in Figeac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rittergasse 3 in Eisenach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Estaing 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain on Marienplatz in Naumburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Did you use a ND filter ? It would be worth adding the relevant category. --Trougnouf 09:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Eisenach (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Notre-Dame in Villefranche-de-Rouergue 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! General High School Jean Lurcat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of La Machine (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour des Anglais in Aubrac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in St-Ennemond 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Estaing 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Theodulos church in La-Tour-de-Peilz 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metzgergasse 2 in Aarau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trifolium pratense in Aveyron (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau des Palanges (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 10:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cordyline australis in Abel Tasman NP (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luther church in Apolda 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Naumburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 14:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Four in Villeneuve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3-5 Market Square in Bydgoszcz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:08, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 7 in Trier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 14:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spuenesch Tiermercher in Luxembourg City 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 12:17, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tribunale d'Arrondissement in Luxembourg City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! All Saints church in Otorowo (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 28 in Lwowek (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Pniewy (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 11:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church in Bydgoszcz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 11:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collegiate in Szamotuly (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:54, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schillerplatz 8 in Wetzlar (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Florian church in Znin 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman Bridge over Dourdou River in Conques 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Florian church in Znin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Beautiful! There is a major (and some minor) dust spot, please see image notes. --Aristeas 09:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 09:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 09:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Nimes 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clock tower of Lycee Alphonse-Daudet in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 15:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Boulevard Talabot in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Municipal Media Library in Villefranche-de-Rouergue 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Milliarede in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel du Louvre in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained-glass window of the Cathedral of Nimes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steven Sun 11:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained-glass window of the Cathedral of Nimes (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:05, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Hotel-Dieu in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte d'Espagne in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of the Cathedral of Nimes (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte d'Espagne in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 40 Rue Porte de France in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 25 Rue Jean Reboul in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Bigot in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are small distracting highlights, but good quality. --Etaped 19:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 Boulevard Talabot in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petit Temple des Ursulines in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 19:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Milliarede in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 17:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained-glass window of the Cathedral of Nimes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Top could be a tad sharper but it's good enough for me. Rodhullandemu 08:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Notre-Dame in Villefranche-de-Rouergue 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained-glass window of the Cathedral of Nimes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of the Cathedral of Nimes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality. --Palauenc05 08:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 6 place du ble in La Canourgue (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 10:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Foggy day in Saint-Bonnet-de-Chirac (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:42, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin church in La Capelle (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Marvejols 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:00, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Romanus church in Chirac (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Marvejols 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Pin (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domain of Grandlac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Dave in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge of Jacques-Gabriel in Blois[edit]

Hi, I have put your awesome photo on all wiki pages, of course if you disagree just let me know and I will remove them. Thanks for your wonderful work. --Commonists 20:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Commonists; thanks for you! Tournasol7 (talk) 20:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Marchastel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Marchastel Lozere (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Saint-Bonnet-de-Chirac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de Montferrand (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 rue Theodore-Jean in Marvejols (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Gerald abbey hospital in Aurillac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Faith Abbey Church of Conques 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge over Lot River in Saint-Geniez-d'Olt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Marvejols 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator of Chirac church in Monastier (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualityu --Michielverbeek 08:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue Maillan in La Canourgue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 17:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Chanac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Nous avons reçu sur OTRS une demande pour flouter les plaques d'immatriculation des deux véhicules présents sur la photo (File:Sainte-Austremoine_Church_01.jpg). Cela est-il possible ?

Mattho69; j'ai téléchargé nouvelle version. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merci

--Mattho69 (talk) 08:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Etangs de Bassies 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de Bonald in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Pavee in Villeneuve 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domain of Grandlac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent church in Canilhac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Ressouches 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Marvejols 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Frezal chapel in Canourgue 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (1a).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice. There are 3 dust spots right at the head of the top statue (see image) note. --Aristeas 10:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 12:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 10:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former jesuit college in Bydgoszcz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former jesuit college in Bydgoszcz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Belcastel 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau d'Audiernes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Augustinian church of Villefranche-de-Rouergue 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin church in La Capelle (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator of Chirac church in Monastier (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Chanac (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Romanus church in Chirac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Assomption church in La Cote-d'Arbroz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality ~--Michielverbeek 07:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Haute-Savoie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support amazing work! --Yitzilitt 22:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Roy 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ..
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mining museum in Aubin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Blown highlihgt should be fixed or cropped out. --Ermell 09:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 11:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Martin church in La Capelle (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the CAs. --XRay 07:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment And a bit too bright --LexKurochkin 06:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version uploaded, Tournasol7 10:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better. Thank you. --XRay 11:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is on![edit]

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bridge of Jacques-Gabriel in Blois 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bridge of Jacques-Gabriel in Blois 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 12:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Bret 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vordere Vorstadt 1 in Aarau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in St-Ennemond 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port of La Tour-de-Peilz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schaalgasse 2 in Solothurn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Leaning left IMO. --Ermell 08:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version uploaded, Tournasol7 11:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Ressouches 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slighty too bright IMO --Ermell 22:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version uploaded, Tournasol7 10:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Causse de Severac in Mostuejouls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 16:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Saint-Andre-de-Vezines 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bletilla striata in La Jaysinia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Col de Coux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-du-Larzac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 09:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Placette Andre Bonnard in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Some flowers look strange but I think it is inevitable with so long exposure time. --LexKurochkin 12:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhinanthus alectorolophus in Taninges (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 18:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corniche de Causse Mejean.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac des Plagnes 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4-5 Place Carnot in Figeac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Argiope bruennichi in Haute-Savoie (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bonnevaux HS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Anne chapel in Les Plagnes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Le Biot 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Haute-Savoie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Liridon 15:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schaitbergerstrasse in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor Wat 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barthstrasse 1 in Lauf an der Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altes Zeughaus in Solothurn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelical church of the German Community in Montreux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]