Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LEI0440 190 Leica IIIf chrom - Sn. 580566 1951-52-M39 vs. Minox Leica IIIf Ohne Blitz Version 2-6124 hf.jpg

File:LEI0440 190 Leica IIIf chrom - Sn. 580566 1951-52-M39 vs. Minox Leica IIIf Ohne Blitz Version 2-6124 hf.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2015 at 06:03:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:LEI0440 190 Leica IIIf chrom - Sn. 580566 1951-52-M39 vs. Minox Leica IIIf Ohne Blitz Version 2-6124 hf.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LEI0440 190 Leica IIIf chrom - Sn. 580566 1951-52-M39 vs. Minox Leica IIIf Ohne Blitz Version 2-6124 hf.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created and uploaded by Kameraprojekt Graz 2015 - nominated by Hubertl -- Hubertl 06:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Info Focus stacking from 27 single pictures. Many cameras were replicated as a fully workable subminiatur modell. in this case the original Leica IIIf (1951) together with Minox Leica IIIf. Both cameras are using the same 135 film.
•  Support -- Hubertl 06:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I'd prefer a white background. -- -donald- (talk) 06:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

   Question Thanks for your suggestion, -donald-. You mean selecting the Object without mirroring - just white plain background? --Kameraprojekt Graz 2015 (talk) 09:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

I mean with mirroring, but the rest of the table or background real white and not light gray. Maybe you can do it in PS. -- -donald- (talk) 06:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Very good work. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 08:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Question Are you sure about the film format of the Minox? It seems to be way too small for 135 film, and a quick online search suggests that it was made for 8x11: Camerapedia, Amazon, Leica AG price list. --El Grafo (talk) 08:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

   Comment No, I´m not absolutely sure. The owner of the collection is on vacation right now, no Internet.--Hubertl 08:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

  • @Hubertl: The film format of the Minox Leica IIIf was 8x11mm compared to the Leica IIIf with 24x36mm. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 11:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

  @Johann Jaritz: : Thank you! --Hubertl 12:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Support--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality and compositionally nice (big and small). --Code (talk) 11:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --DXR (talk) 15:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 17:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for the clarification regarding film format. Picture quality is of course excellent, and I really like the idea of comparing original and miniature. The big one has some dirty spots, though … --El Grafo (talk) 19:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tuxyso (talk) 19:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Another great photo of some old cameras. Daniel Case (talk) 20:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Cute ! I too would prefer whiter background, but it's also very nice like that. - Benh (talk) 06:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support There are several missing focus parts but nice! --Laitche (talk) 08:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:20, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco² 12:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects