Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bootiful freight train from Merehead Quarry at Chichester sidings Tuesday 12 October 2021.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Bootiful freight train from Merehead Quarry at Chichester sidings Tuesday 12 October 2021.jpg
[edit]
This file has been used on W:Frieght train with caption changed to indicate it is in a quarry. IT IS NOT IN A QUARRY! User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 19:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- So why not just change the caption in the Wikipedia article? What is the reason for asking for the image to be deleted? It seems a bit like overkill.
- 10mmsocket (talk) 20:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Because Djm is indeffed on enwiki for CIR reasons. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- (edit conflict precisely how it was written) : @10mmsocket: As your are probably/possibly well aware I am indef blocked on the English Wikipedia. Therefore I cannot make that change without block evasion. I also am not able to ask anyone else to make that change because that would be editing by proxy. But I do have an issue with images I have provided in ood faith being misrepresented, all be in in good faith. So I have little option but either to inject a image over the top, and unless I did that brilliantly I would be in trouble (For example creating a "photoshop" image of that train into a quarry. I also have to look at all sort of vandalism on the English Wikipedia, including that by removal of a verifiable all be it self published, low quality or virus infected site, leaving a possible W:WP:HIJACK by the trailing source rather than using w:Template:Better source needed or w:Template:Citation needed (reason=previous source removed because)! It just makes fixing such articles just so much harder! I'd like to go up to Oxford on Sunday to discuss with Redrose64 along with NER Atlantics and lots of other good stuff on Wikidata relating to UK and Irish railways and sources really useful to Trains and Railways and some SparQL queries I hope to develop to locate online borrowable uk books! Anyway back to this its simple not on to claim that picture of a train is in a Quarry. It isn't! But how to solve? I'm kind of snookered. Which reminds me I also need to visit this quarry which really needs a Mergoto flag upgrade if I get round to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs)
- @Trainsandotherthings: I had tried to contact you on the talk page but didn't seem to be working. Yes all I need is that caption changed. And I think that has to be an unload rather than load operation but you wouldn't think it from the photo. The mistake is understandable. The boot(iful) in the caption refers to the drivers feet seeming to be up on the cab console. Surprisingly he/she who changes that caption because I've pointed it out can be had up for editing by proxy! But if you want train sources some online free borrowable (and others not borrowable that I have) are located at Simple:User:Djm-leighpark/B created by my "Project Egg" spreadsheet (hopefully replaced by "Project Chicken" tool in 2023) & these are designed to be leveraged by Mike Peel's Cite Q stuff. This is way out of what's needed here but my "mate" Ottawahitech contribution at q:en:wikiquote is perhaps a challenge given the status of my pass on the unconnected in that place. Back to here I am grateful the invalidate caption applied to the and am happy for it to be replaced by a similar one albeit I had initially guessed that as on approach to Clapham Junction but on reflection the fast up would not be the place for it to be and it is elsewhere. More seriously I observe the re-captioning of the replacement image is incorrect (unless I've got it wrong) on a to/from loaded/unloaded basis and AGF that was not an attempt to trick me into jumping to propose that for deletion also; that can be a DyK evaluation matter at some point; but I am getting a little paranoid today. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 01:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- (edit conflict precisely how it was written) : @10mmsocket: As your are probably/possibly well aware I am indef blocked on the English Wikipedia. Therefore I cannot make that change without block evasion. I also am not able to ask anyone else to make that change because that would be editing by proxy. But I do have an issue with images I have provided in ood faith being misrepresented, all be in in good faith. So I have little option but either to inject a image over the top, and unless I did that brilliantly I would be in trouble (For example creating a "photoshop" image of that train into a quarry. I also have to look at all sort of vandalism on the English Wikipedia, including that by removal of a verifiable all be it self published, low quality or virus infected site, leaving a possible W:WP:HIJACK by the trailing source rather than using w:Template:Better source needed or w:Template:Citation needed (reason=previous source removed because)! It just makes fixing such articles just so much harder! I'd like to go up to Oxford on Sunday to discuss with Redrose64 along with NER Atlantics and lots of other good stuff on Wikidata relating to UK and Irish railways and sources really useful to Trains and Railways and some SparQL queries I hope to develop to locate online borrowable uk books! Anyway back to this its simple not on to claim that picture of a train is in a Quarry. It isn't! But how to solve? I'm kind of snookered. Which reminds me I also need to visit this quarry which really needs a Mergoto flag upgrade if I get round to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs)
- Because Djm is indeffed on enwiki for CIR reasons. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination: This image is no longer in use with an incorrect caption and I am therefore happy to withdraw this nomination to delete. Thankyou and sorry for the inconvenience. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 01:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, nomination withdrawn. --Mike Peel (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
