User talk:Mike Peel
|
|
| Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you. If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website. |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Support Good quality. -- |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mexico City 2015 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Edward's Church, Leek 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - John Frederick William Herschel correspondence 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - John Frederick William Herschel correspondence 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! At New York City 2023 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
RE:[edit]
hi Mr. Mike Peel, I saw your thank you and I am pleased with it, on the other hand alas there are scattered throughout the commons many files of excellent quality but without category, which is the cause of cloned uploads alas :) I would like to ask you if you are a ' administrator?? Nesinatra (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Nesinatra: Yup, there's plenty to do, keep up the good work with categorising. :-) I am a janitor/admin here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
I would absolutely avoid using it because it takes obscenely long to submit a request and then see the result, and then I would have files that would not accept me, and I would need immediate recovery. these are PD licensed files (portrait & paintings & vintage photographs). by chance if you had the emails, I could send you some of those files to show you, I would avoid doing it here so as not to fill your talk unnecessarily. I also say it out of a sense of education :) --Nesinatra (talk) 17:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Nesinatra: I'd still encourage you to submit the request, and ping me if it does take a while and I can have a look at it there. You can also email me via Special:EmailUser/Mike_Peel if you want. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- thank you very much. I will not fail to let you hear from me as soon as possible, thank you very much--Nesinatra (talk) 18:09, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Comment, @Mike Peel: In fact this user appears to be another sockpuppet of LTA abuser A3cb1, who has dedicated himself to mass uploading images of paintings and photographs of members of the nobility and European royal houses with little information about the authors and dates of completion, and all this for many years. Although some of those files are old enough to fall under PD, a considerable part of them were not yet –rather, they were copyvios– and, despite warnings, numerous DRs and checkuser requests, this LTA continues with the same actions. Their last socks appear to share with this user the same modus operandi: first they add and/or change categories of existing files, later, upload some files of different scope to nobility –although this user has not yet uploaded files–, and then they ask individual administrators for undeletion of their other socks' files. See Requests for checkuser/Case/A3cb1 for more information. 81.41.175.237 18:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Nesinatra: I've had a look at the example you emailed, that case would need to go through Commons:Undeletion requests. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chetham's Library 2015 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Society - Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica manuscript 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|