User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.


Copyright status: File:Santa Maria dei Teatini (Ferrara).jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Santa Maria dei Teatini (Ferrara).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Sisley, Boats on the Sienne, Courtauld Gallery.jpg[edit]

Hi, I verfied the painting, it is the Seine, not the Sienne. I suggest to request renaming it File:Sisley, Boats on the Seine, Courtauld Gallery.jpg. Best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 11:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Moved, thanks for verifying the painting and catching that mistake! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Your welcome! I was wondering about Seine/Sienne, and could verify in an excellent book where this painting is described. There are many others by Sisley of this area, one of which is only black and white in a book by François Daulte : La Seine au point- du-jour, le quatorze juillet. It is stated it was in an exhibition by Richard Nathanson : "London. June Exhibitions and a Recent Film - JStor" www.jstor.org/stable/880465 "But besides several pedestrian works there are some notable ones: La Seine au point- du-jour, le quatorze juillet, (D.85; Fig.57) ". There is a website about Richard Nathanson, but this painting is not there. I did not find it either on wikiart.org. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 12:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Apollo17earth white.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Apollo17earth white.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcpag2012 (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikimedia Commons 12:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)