User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

View from the Torre degli Asinelli, Bologna 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Torre degli Asinelli, Bologna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with Migrating to Art photo[edit]

In this edit you replaced "{{Information field|" with "{{Art photo|Wikidata=Q110713956 field|". Jarekt (talk) 12:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarekt: Yes, the code would do that. I hadn't heard of {{Information field}} before, otherwise I'd have coded an exception for it - too late now. Hopefully there shouldn't be too many cases with that, though? (and maybe that's something that could be migrated into the information templates directly?). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I only found handful of files with this issue, so hopefully it is not a widespread problem. {{Information field}} is a bizarre legacy template which when added to "other_field" of {{Information}} and other templates can add additional fields, with any text, to the infobox, by benign en:Code injection. It can be useful, especially when creating custom infobox templates, but can easily lead to pages with invalid html. It is already integrated with all infobox templates so there is nothing to migrate. --Jarekt (talk) 13:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jarekt: OK. I was thinking more like having "name1", "field1" lines and directly supporting the additions in the information templates, rather than the code injection approach. But better would be to just migrate them into normal fields / structured data anyway. I know nothing more about how it's used beyond this discussion, though, so perhaps it's just a rabbit hole to avoid. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is a legacy issue, and unless we want to be fixing some percentage of 85 M files that are using the existing system, it is better not to touch and keep backward compatibility. --Jarekt (talk) 00:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Beeston Castle 2016 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beeston Castle 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 22:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Benin Bronzes, Horniman Museum 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benin Bronzes, Horniman Museum 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:19, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Møller Centre, Churchill College, Cambridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Møller Centre, Churchill College, Cambridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 22:07, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]