User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments interesting detail, good quality

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 20:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sharpness is quite low here, but might be OK. I suggest removing chromatic aberration at the second left window and reduce noise-reduction slightly. --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tweaked as requested, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.  Thank you. --Augustgeyler 21:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Macclesfield 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 14:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
slightly tilted to the right? --Georgfotoart 17:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rotated, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:42, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 21:03, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI imo. --ArildV 08:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category

[edit]

Hola, piBot, podrías crear la página de Antonio Jesús Roldán Muñoz en Commons, conectar la ID de Wikipedia, al igual que hiciste en Inmaculada Sánchez Zara. Gracias. Un Saludo Uregapedia (talk) 10:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Antonio Jesús Roldán Muñoz ya esta bueno? Gracias. Mike Peel (talk) 16:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 348.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 15:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you crop a bit more on the left (to get rid of the glass)? --Poco a poco 07:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cropped, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better, although I'd have gone further. --Poco a poco 12:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Knowsley Safari Park 2006 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 12:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 16:20, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Hardwick Hall 2024 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok imo. --ArildV 19:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I think you should crop the object at the bottom-left corner, and increase exposure of the bottom-right piece of land. --Benjism89 10:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestions, cropped and brightened, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks, good quality now. Benjism89 19:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I would suggest cropping out the left and right ends, as they are out of focus. I doesn't bother me that flowers that are behind the main subjects are out of focus as they constitute a background, but I'm less confortable with foreground out of focus flowers. --Benjism89 20:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cropped, does that look better? I'm not sure about cropping further as I think that adds depth to the photo. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I think it's better now. Cropping makes the two sharp, in focus flowers more central in the picture. --Benjism89 19:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museu de Arte Contemporânea da Universidade de São Paulo 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:19, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
QI imo but a small cw tilt? --ArildV 19:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've redone the perspective (now guided rather than automatic), hopefully that's also fixed the tilt? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you. Nice photo! --ArildV 06:43, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]