Category talk:1 animal
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
What on earth is the point of this category? If fully implemented, it would contain about a million or more photos. Delete, and delete the subcategories. MPF (talk) 15:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep There are many categories with 'a million or more photos', and they are sub-categorized to sort them, which is exactly what should be done here if there are enough files to warrant sub-cats (as some already exist). As for the point of the category, it is simply part of the general "'quantity' 'item'" category scheme. 'Counting' categories have been discussed before and while debated, ultimately they were kept. Josh (talk) 23:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Neutral part of a Category:Animals by quantity scheme--Estopedist1 (talk) 12:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep it's part of the whole category-tree, for example ...
- Greets Triplec85 (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Similar category trees exists: Quality images, Featured pictures, Valued images, date categories, color categories, shape categories, ... . Why not cardinality categories? --XRay 💬 02:52, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I see it similar to Triplec or XRay. There is now a very extensive and constantly expanding category tree on this topic. Should you delete every single category now? There will be people looking for pictures with, for example, exactly 2 dogs. That's what these categories are for.--Geoprofi Lars (talk) 11:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Support And it has a deeper structure that fits with the whole category tree:
- For all these categories, the Category:1 animal is the useful, appropriate main category
...
- All Categories by quantity always go from 1,2,3,4 ... to about ~ 12, some more ... and end with many.
- This whole structure from beginning from 1, ..., to many should of course be kept. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 13:08, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- All Categories by quantity always go from 1,2,3,4 ... to about ~ 12, some more ... and end with many.
@MPF, Triplec85, Geoprofi Lars, and Estopedist1: Closed (no consensus to change) Josh (talk) 09:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)