From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

rezabot (talk · contribs)[edit]

Operator: User:reza1615 (User talk:reza1615)

Bot's tasks for which permission is being sought: Adding {{Assessments}} on files featured in fa.wp

Automatic or manually assisted: automatic

Edit type (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily

Maximum edit rate (eg edits per minute):40 per week (It's almost impossible)

Bot flag requested: (Y/N):Y

Programming language(s):Python, homemade but on base of m:PWB (amirobot's works with that codes)

Reza1615 (talk) 10:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


  • Please make a test run. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Except that it inserts a new line, which is uncommon for this template, the edits look good to me. Why not? -- RE rillke questions? 16:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
      • It is still adding unneccessary newlines: [1], please fix this asap. --99of9 (talk) 12:51, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
  • It looks like the new lines problem is resolved [2], [3], [4]. However the bot is inactive since May. Regards. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 16:35, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

I think this should be closed due to the inactivity, plus the fact that we have at least two very similar newer bot requests (タチコマ robot and MahdiBot). とある白い猫 (operator of タチコマ robot) has shown at least technical expertise in performing the {{Assessments}} updates and seems like the best person to perform this particular job. --Dschwen (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

I agree with you. Sorry but this request has been opened nearly for a whole year (!!). Enough discussion time has elapsed and we just got three comments with some concerns regarding bot's operation, with no operator replies. Operators are expected to be responsive, too. Given the bot inactivity, the absence or operator replies on this pages to questions and the time that this request has been opened I would not favor granting any approval nor a botflag for now & thus support a closure of this request as unsuccessful. Without prejudice that if the operator is willing to run the bot again he or she be allowed to open a new request. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 04:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Closed as stale. --Dschwen (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)