User talk:Rillke/Discuss/2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
< User talk:Rillke‎ | Discuss(Redirected from User talk:Rillke)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← previous page2019→ next page
Babel user information
en-2 This user has intermediate knowledge of English.
de-3 Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf hohem Niveau.
fr-1 Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.
Users by language


User:Rillke/SVGedit.js / User:Rillke/MwJSBot.js[edit]

Your User:Rillke/SVGedit.js / User:Rillke/MwJSBot.js thing for SVG file editing behaves in a somewhat annoying manner, since it apparently inserts a pre-canned generic message into the upload summary, and does not require users to provide any indication of the nature and purpose of their edits to an SVG file. This probably will not found to be acceptable in the long term... AnonMoos (talk) 14:30, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

AnonMoos, thanks for raising this concern. Are users mandated supplying an edit summary when using the upload form for overriding a file? Can you please start a discussion on User talk:Rillke/SVGedit.js? Thank you. -- Rillke(q?) 21:43, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
It can be annoying when a user uploads a new edited file version without supplying any indication of the purpose or nature of their edits. I was already annoyed with User talk:大诺史 with respect to File:Coat of arms of South Yemen (1967-1970).svg and and File:Coat of arms of South Yemen (1970-1990).svg... AnonMoos (talk) 06:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Can you please add your suggestion for a mandatory edit summary on User talk:Rillke/SVGedit.js? Thank you. -- Rillke(q?) 09:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
I basically know nothing about Javascript, and do not have Javascript turned on for all websites in my browser, and do not feel qualified to comment about any technical aspects -- however, I do know about UPLOAD SUMMARY best practices on Wikimedia Commons (Note: not quite the same thing as an edit summary, though your tool may slightly blur the distinction between the two). As the author of the tool, you can presumably take any comments made here into account... See near the bottom of User talk:Sarang right now for some quasi-technical comments. AnonMoos (talk) 19:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for sharing the reason for your hesitation. No technical understanding is required to comment on how a particular script should work or pointing to issues with it. That's also why the scripts point to themselves in their edit summary. It's about keeping discussion and changes together and allow other people who are watching the script but not my talk page to comment. I'd rather avoid doing changes to scripts seemingly out of the blue. -- Rillke(q?) 22:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


✓ Done -- Rillke(q?) 10:19, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

User:CommonsMaintenanceBot/autopatrolled candidates.json[edit]

Hey Rillke,

The bot no longer updates this. Can this be fixed? 1989 (talk) 20:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

The bot takes the data from - however expose-data seems to be broken then. -- Rillke(q?) 22:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done. Bot needs to be unblocked. -- Rillke(q?) 12:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins-data.js broken[edit]

Hello. It appears the group "Image-reviewers" has been renamed to "image-reviewers". Can you please fix that in your script? Thx. --Krd 16:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Maybe next week. I didn't change anything of its code recently. -- Rillke(q?) 18:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done Krd, Didym Please unblock. -- Rillke(q?) 12:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Please replace Image-reviewer with image-reviewer in MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins.js and also in these user scripts. Thanks! -- Rillke(q?) 12:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

And why does User talk:CommonsMaintenanceBot link to User talk:Rillke/Discuss/2016? --Krd 16:26, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Probably to avoid a double-redirect. -- Rillke(q?) 18:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)


Der Bot dreht im Moment völlig durch, daher war vorläufig eine Sperre notwendig. --Didym (talk) 16:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Das hat er auch schon als die OTRS Benutzergruppe umbenannt wurde. Wer nennt nur Benutzergruppen um ... -- Rillke(q?) 19:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Hast du den Bot mitterweile wieder soweit unter Kontrolle, dass ich die Sperre aufheben kann? Notfalls vorerst ohne die Aktualisierung der Liste, aber wenigstens die anderen Aufgaben sollten wieder weiterlaufen können. --Didym (talk) 19:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Nein :-( Habe diese Woche zahlende Kunden. Nächste Woche schneide ich eine Scheibe Freizeit ab. -- Rillke(q?) 21:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Der CommonsMaintenanceBot sollte jetzt wieder problemlos laufen. Bitte entsperren. -- Rillke(q?) 12:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Bitte ersetze Image-reviewer mit image-reviewer in MediaWiki:Gadget-markAdmins.js und ebenso in diesen Benutzerscripten. Danke! -- Rillke(q?) 12:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done --Didym (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Didym, vielen Dank. Könntest du auch noch diese Änderung anwenden? Es hat sich gezeigt, dass es einen Bug im Script gibt: Wenn eine Gruppe nicht anzeigen lässt (z.B. per User/common.js), dann werden alle Gruppen, die ein Benutzer hat und erst nach der versteckten Gruppe gelesen werden nicht gezeigt. -- Rillke(q?) 16:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

User:CommonsMaintenanceBot/autopatrolled candidates.json[edit]

Hi, I don't know who places names in this botfile, but user:Lidewij C J. (id:262263) does not belong there. I think a dutch moderator who had some differences in the past with Lidewij C J. on NL-Wikipedia, put this user on that list. Who controls this? There is no reason this person needs to be patrollerd here. Regards, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 23:07, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Richardkiwi, you are absolutely right that the list contains some users who shouldn't be auto-patrolled. It servers administrators to better find the needle in the haystack, because it is otherwise not easy to find users who do not participate in discussions and work in fancy topics. Administrators then individually assess whether a user might be trusted having their own edits patrolled. The patrol backlog is usually overwhelming. There are currently 392248+ unpatrolled edits. This in turn means that we can either decide to let edits go unpatrolled entirely or grant user groups to users.
The list states the criteria it is created from and offers links to view - besides others - global account information and the right log. Feel free to edit the description of Commons:Requests_for_rights/possible_autopatrolled_candidates, if you feel you should mention that appearing on this list doesn't automatically makes good candidates; that individual assessment is required. -- Rillke(q?) 05:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)


Can I add a custom option to tag files for speedy for criteria (F10 / G10) similar to Help:QuickDelete? 1989 (talk) 18:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

It is possible but undocumented (and therefore not well supported; might break at any time). One would have to observe the vFC event on $(document), and if it says 'installed', insert elements on mdUserTags, mdFileTags, mdOpt and mdCommandsExec. The interesting code for that is MediaWiki:Gadget-VisualFileChange.js/core.js. If you really want to do this, either figure out yourself or please provide me with:
  1. An edit summary on the file description page and on the uploader's talk page
  2. The templates to insert to the file description page and at the user's talk page.
Otherwise it might be just easier to select "prepend text, notify uploaders", fill it in correctly and safe as a profile. -- Rillke(q?) 22:53, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Here's the info. 1989 (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Chunk upload not working[edit]

Hi, we are trying to upload new version with Chunk upload tool. We successfully uploaded File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश खंड ५ - कृषी, पशुसंवर्धन.pdf in the series of volumes. But after this upload, from 1 August 2019 we are not able to upload new versions of following files -

The error showing - Stashfailed:This file did not pass file verification
Kindly help us to resolve the issue and guide on further steps. @Yann: for info. Regards, --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 05:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

@सुबोध कुलकर्णी: Hi,
Are the files available somewhere else, so we can test? If not, you can upload them to Regards, Yann (talk) 07:06, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yann:, one of the volume in the series is uploded by copyright holder on Internet Archive here. I request you to test the same and guide us in further process. --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 08:00, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
@सुबोध कुलकर्णी: File is here: File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश खंड १ - इतिहास.pdf. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks @Yann:. How should we proceed for further uploads? Is chunk upload working now or shall we upload remaining 5 volumes to IA? --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 08:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
@सुबोध कुलकर्णी: I am not sure what is the problem. Are you sure you use the right format? There are PDF and JPEG files listed above. And I thought you wanted to use the DjVu format. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yann:, we want to use pdf format only. The jpg files were uploaded by mistake. The publishing house, who holds the copyright has uploaded two more volumes on archive. First one is here and second is here. Please do the needful. Thanks again.--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 11:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I uploaded the second one, but I can't upload the first one. It is a big file (473 MB), and I get errors repeatedly (I tried at least 10 times). I reported the bug. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
@सुबोध कुलकर्णी: For the last one, Urbanecm suggests to upload it via Help:Server-side_upload (see phab:T231119#5437922). Regards, Yann (talk) 14:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
The last file is uploaded now. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yann, Martin Urbanec:, thanks for help in uploads. We tried IA upload tool also, but failed. We need to resolve these issues. The copyright holder Hindustan Prakashan Sanstha wants to re-license another 4 volumes, which will be uploaded on IA here as before. Kindly help us bringing the same on Commons. Thanks again, --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 07:18, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
I would be happy to do so, may I ask you to send me direct links to the files (either directly to the PDFs [preferred] or to the file description page at IA) once they are uploaded? You can do so by posting them here and pinging me (as I don't have your talk page in my watchlist), by sending me a message to my talk page, or by creating a request in Wikimedia Phabricator. Also, regardless which way you'll choose, please indicate a) filenames you want to have it under on Commons b) whether existing files are expected at the destination you indicate, to ensure I won't overwrite anything unintentionally. Thank you! --Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yann, Martin Urbanec:, thanks for help. Two more volumes are uploaded on IA. The Volume 3 is to be uploaded as new version of File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश खंड ३ – विज्ञान, तंत्रज्ञान, शिक्षण.pdf. The Volume 6 is to be uploaded as new version of File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश खंड ६ – दृश्यकला.jpg. Kind request to help in upload of the same. The remaining volume 2 in the series will be uploaded soon. Regards, --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 05:52, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done both. Yann (talk) 06:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. @Yann, Jayantanth:. Please process the OTRS for all these volumes. Only one file (File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश - खंड ४ - न्यायपालिका, प्रशासन, संरक्षण.pdf) from this set is cleared. The ticket - [Ticket# 2019072510006855] is same for all the other volumes. @कोकणकन्या:, please note. Regards,--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 07:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
@सुबोध कुलकर्णी: The publisher should send a mail with a list of all books, and some quite of proof that the sender is legally authorised to release these books under a free license. An ID document and a list of on a letterhead paper would work, signed and stamped by an authorized representative of the publisher. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yann, Jayantanth:,Thanks. As far as I know, they have sent this. I shall communicate this to publisher and ask them to send the docs again.--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 11:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

@सुबोध कुलकर्णी: Actually no (at least not in this ticket). Only one book is listed, and the permission comes from a Gmail address. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

@Yann, Jayantanth:, I just asked them to send everything afresh again. You will receive the same in few hours. Btw there are two tickets regarding this case - Ticket:2019072510006855 and Ticket:2019072510006846. --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 12:01, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Ah, that's confusing. I merged all 3 tickets into one: ticket:2019072510006846. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I hope, the matter will be resolved once you get the mail from them. They received two tickets separately each for declaration mail & authorisation mail to permissions. So, there is no confusion regarding these 7 uploads. The upload of first file, i.e File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश - खंड ४ - न्यायपालिका, प्रशासन, संरक्षण.pdf(Ticket #2019060610003485) is separate issue already resolved. --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 12:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Yes, but since the permission comes from the same person, and concerns the same type of material, it is better to keep them together to understand the context. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:58, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Agreed. You might have received the mail with all required proofs. Please go through and let us know anything more to be done.--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 13:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
✓ Done Everything is OK. Yann (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, grateful for your guidance and help at every stage.--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 13:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yann, Martin Urbanec:, request for help in uploading to Commons, the last volume uploaded by publisher on IA. The Volume 2 is to be uploaded as new version ofFile:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश खंड २ – साहित्य.pdf under the same OTRS ticket. regards, --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 15:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
upload_by_url failed like before. I reported this in the same bug. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
@Yann, Martin Urbanec: Yes, I also tried several times. Then pinged both of you for help. thanks--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 02:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
See [1]. It appears to worked, despite showing an error, and at unexpected filename. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
@Yann, Martin Urbanec:, the file name is correct. The file is shown in category, but if you click on the link it is giving some MediaWiki internal error. Please look into it.--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, it is looked at. See phab:T231276. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
@Yann, Martin Urbanec:, thanks for cooperation. It seems, the issue is resolved. Check once. --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

CommonsMaintenanceBot opt-out[edit]

Hi! Kannst du vielleicht eine Opt-Out-Möglichkeit zum Validation-Teil des CommonsMaintenanceBot hinzufügen, die mich nicht zwingt, eine projektspezifische Benutzerseite anzulegen (d. h., die mir erlaubt, die von Meta eingebundene Version zu behalten)? Zwei Vorschläge: nach Category:Users opting out validation spam nicht nur auf der Benutzerseite, sondern auf der Benutzerdiskussionsseite suchen; und/oder ein spezieller Kommentar im Skript, z. B. /* {{ValidationOptOut}} */. (Die Skript-spezifische Variante wäre mir lieber, denn im Moment ist der Bot nur für ein bestimmtes meiner Skripte nutzlos.) --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 11:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil[edit]

WLM - BR.pdf

Saudações. Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque, em outro ano, participou da competição fotográfica Wiki Loves Monuments. Escrevo em nome do grupo organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments deste ano para convidá-lo/convidá-la a participar de novo!

O Wiki Loves Monuments é o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Permite ampliar o conhecimento global sobre o Brasil, mostrando a riqueza cultural e histórica do país. Neste ano, ampliamos enormemente as listas de monumentos a serem registrados e isso ajuda na difusão da diversidade brasileira.

Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil e ganhe prêmios! Serão premiadas as melhores fotografias e também aqueles e aquelas que mais contribuirem com registros fotográficos diversos do patrimônio cultural e histórico brasileiro. Leia as instruções com cuidado!

De novo, obrigado por participar do Wiki Loves Monuments e melhorar o conhecimento livre disponível na internet! Se tiver dúvidas, não hesite em entrar em contato!—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲»22:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]


Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 3740 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)