User talk:EugeneZelenko

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archived messages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

Regarding the deletion of files from User:iLovePizza800[edit]

I have made some mistakes when posting files because i don't know much about copyright and issues regarding them..i am very sorry for all those mistakes when uploading files.:( I am still a new editor on this platform and got a bit sad when seeing those messages on rejections and stuff T_T I'll make sure to be more careful when uploading things. But in-order to make things right , can you add all the files in my page for speedy deletion if possible ? or a way to delete them ? ( i couldnt figure out a way ) Thank you !!. Small request + P.S. : Pls review the page Draft:Tri.be Da Loca and if it doesnt meet the satisfaction from you , pls request it to deletion as well , i was finding a way to delete that as well. Thank you once again ILovePizza800

Please read Commons:Licensing and copyrights law of your country carefully before next upload. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyvio images[edit]

Please remove these copyright violation images

Thanks. Run n Fly (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done by Túrelio (talk · contribs). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion of Whitehawk FC club badge[edit]

Hello, you deleted Whitehawk FC's club badge as a potential copyright infringement. This badge is freely available (like all other football club badges in this country), so please could you explain why it was removed. Thanks

(talk page stalker) @Hrse12: Hello. Being available free of charge on the internet does not mean that anyone can freely use these logos. From a copyright point of view they are still protected and may not be used or modified and resold without permission from the original designer or from the club. The only exceptions would be that the rendition of the logo is so old that the copyright has expired or that it is too simple. In case of the Whitehawk FC logo though, it is clearly copyrightable though. Also you wrote that it was your own work which is apparently not true. Please see also COM:SIGN. De728631 (talk) 22:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alleged persistent uploading of copyright content: warning[edit]

Hello, all the photos that have been listed against my user name as possible copyright infringements (other than the club badge for Whitehawk FC) are my own photos. Maybe I have uploaded them wrongly, but I've no idea how anybody would judge they infringe copyright when I own them myself am an happy to make them available on wikipedia. I've uploaded a number of photos of my own for various footballers, without any objection, but certain players seem to be followed by specific editors who object to the uploads, even after I've re-loaded through Commons. I spend a lot of time updating and providing references for football pages on Wikipedia, as a look at my edits will demonstrate, so it is really alarming that you've suddenly decided I may need to be banned from editing, when I've done nothing that infringes copyright. Please could you reconsider you warning. Thanks

It's the same as with the FC logos. Owning a copy of an image, i.e. downloading them from the internet does not make you own their copyright. The copyright is automatically assigned to the original photographer once the photo is created. These images were deleted because they could be found elsewhere on the internet and there is no evidence that you were also the original photographer. De728631 (talk) 23:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your reply is not very helpful at all.
The Whitehawk FC image is widely available publicly, as with any other football club on wikipedia - and you've not explained why this one in particular has been singled out for deletion. The wikipedia template for football clubs includes the inclusion of a club logo, so use like this clearly can't be controversial. The either 19 clubs in the same league as Whitehawk have logos on their page, as advised by wikipedia on the template. No doubt I could trawl through the other hundreds of football team wikipedia sites in exactly the same situation, so your judgement is . I'm unclear as to why you have said I tried to pass the logo off as my own work, when it's obviously a club logo.
As for the other photos I have uploaded, these are my own photos. I have not claimed ownership of images having downloaded them from the internet - I took the photographs in question in the first place. I accept that someone else might also have used them elsewhere, but surely when I upload them into Commons, I'm entitled to use them myself (as is anyone else).
I would appreciate a more constructive reply. Hrse12 (talk) 16:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please read Commons:Licensing carefully. Some WMF projects like English Wikipedia allow non-free media that could be uploaded there locally. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Suspicious upload[edit]

File:Ayan in Filmfare Award 2022.jpg was deleted for copyright violation. I feel that File:Ayan in a award show.jpg might be a COM:Flickrwashing to avoid deletion due to COM:CV. Please have a look. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 13:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Others have also felt the same. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ayan in a award show.jpg Run n Fly (talk) 13:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just for understanding: did uploader took photo from event and replaced other person with himself? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
EugeneZelenko Yes I think so, its a copy paste work, and also the uploader had twice removed the deletion discussion notice themselves and via IP Run n Fly (talk) 17:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
EugeneZelenko After repeated warnings they have again uploaded. See File:Ayan 2021.jpg , please remove the file and if eligible block the user/uploader. Thanks Run n Fly (talk) 04:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

{{NoFoP-Belarus}}[edit]

Добрый день, Евгений! Вы бы не могли перевести на белорусский язык шаблон несвободы панорамы в Белоруссии, а также периодически отслеживать группы под этим шаблоном? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Честно говоря, не понимаю необходимость подобного шаблона. Почему сразу не предлагать к удалению? Тем более, что в фотографиях, сделанных в РБ и других странах пост-советского пространства, не паханное поле :-( Одному целенаправленно этим заниматься трудно, но делаю это при обычном патрулировании или в процессе работы с Викиданными (ох уж эти фотографии современных надгробий). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Навскидку: Category:Eastern Cemetery (Minsk) :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sources listed[edit]

As you requested, I have shared with you the sources of the images I published. I want to understand for future references how to list the sources of the images I publish on Wikipedia, as Wikipedia doesn't allow images to be published until it is our own. Flag Mechanic (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photos by Boris Semenov[edit]

Dear Eugene. If you have time, please sum up the discussions on the two photographs:

P.S. Мы не загружаем другие фотографии из архива Бориса Семенова, потому что хотим сначала убедиться, что мы всё верно оформили с этими двумя фотографиями. То есть в правильную ли мы сторону идём? --Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Правильное решение - искать наследников и просить разрешения у них. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Undeletions for VRT-pending[edit]

A user at enwiki has made a plausible claim of license ownership and has some VRT tickets pending to cover a few images you speedy-deleted from Category:Michigan Technological University Winter Carnival that I had tagged. Based oni that new information, I undeleted them and gave them the VRT-pending tag. It looks like there were others from that cat that you have deleted based on either others' tags or your own analysis, that the VRT will cover as well. Should I undelete and tag them as well? Reference your deletion log around 16:57, 31 January 2022. DMacks (talk) 19:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, I don't have VRT access. Please proceed with undeletion if other files are covered by ticket(s). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, no worries. I just didn't want to undo a bunch of your admin actions without giving a heads-up. DMacks (talk) 07:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wikipedia en español 20 años.jpg[edit]

Hola, si me puediera aclarar cuál es el problema de licencia que tiene esta imagen se lo agradecería. Flag of Spain.svgWikiviciao (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Obviously, it's not your own work. Please read Commons:Screenshots carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PD-logo question[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko. The same user who uploaded File:Scm logo.png and File:Benfica de Macau logo.png that you just recently deleted also uploaded File:Chao Pak Kei logo.jpg and File:Tim Iec.jpg under questionable {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} licensing. Although I think this user is just misunderstanding COM:L and COM:NETCOPYVIO and means no real harm, there's also no reason to believe that they represent these soccer clubs in any official capacity and have the authority to release the clubs' logos under such a license.

My question then is whether these might be too simple to be eligible for copyright protection and thus relicensed as {{PD-logo}} as an alternative to deletion. I believe the en:Chao Pak Kei logo would be "PD-logo" per COM:TOO United States, but I'm not so sure about the en:Tim Iec logo. I'm also not sure about whether these would be "PD-logo" per COM:TOO China or COM:TOO Portugal. The teams are based out of Macau and Macau used to be under Portuguese control, but now is under Chinese control; so, I'm not sure what would be considered the countries of first publication/origin for these logos. Do you think these can be kept if they're relicensed to a more appropriate license? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Both looks {{PD-textlogo}} for me. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please hide a revision[edit]

I am not sure if this is a valid request by the policy, but I was fixing a bunch of broken files and by mistake uploaded a wrong one here (see second to last revision). Would it be possible to hide that revision because it is not adding anything to the history. It is a completely other file. Mitar (talk) 21:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. Both versions were deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help restore File:I Am Gen Z Poster A4.png[edit]

Hi @EugeneZelenko, we have received VRT email regarding this image File:I Am Gen Z Poster A4.png. Can you restore it, so that I can add the permission to the file? Thank you for your support. Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About user Rooney1948[edit]

Hi Eugene. I'm eswiki sysop. I have seen that you have recently blocked the user Rooney 1948 for repeated copyvio. We also had to do it for the same. I wanted to warn you that the checkuser has confirmed a sockpuppet, XXAliikeRAXx, that he used during a previous block and that, as you can see, he has uploaded the same file several times. I hope the information will be useful. Greetings. Geom (talk) 23:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for help! I created request for Commons checkusers. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Minsk[edit]

Евгений, доброе утро! Категория о Минске очень сильно разрослась - почти 1700 нераспределённых медиафайлов по дочерним категориям. Что нужно делать в этой ситуации? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 08:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Собственно, распределить по дочерним категориям :-) Там много снимков с адресами. В идеале - в категорию для конкретного здания, если нет - то улицы/площади/учреждения. Заодно обратить внимание на слишком грубые нарушения свободы панорамы (мне бросились в глаза мемориальные доски). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Если там конечно же имеются медиафайлы с географическими координатами, то распределение файлов резко облегчается. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Думаю, что в случаях, подобных File:Мінск. Вуліца Карла Маркса, 20.jpg, File:Мінск. Вывеска гасцініцы "Мінск".jpg, File:Мінск. Дом на рагу Першамайскай і Захарава (02).jpg, координаты не так уж необходимы :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Периодически пишите Владиславу Чеховичу на его страницу обсуждения, поскольку именно ему принадлежат большинство нераспределённых фотографий по Минску. Более того, по сравнению с Минском, фотографии других европейских столиц достаточно быстро и своевременно распределяются по полочкам. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Мне довольно трудно объяснять другим очевидные вещи :-( К сожалению, там есть про что более серьёзное писать. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

{{Regions of Belarus}}[edit]

Доброе утро! Вы бы не могли помочь в оформлении перевода шаблона о категориях регионов Белоруссии на русский язык? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 08:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Извиняюсь, немного попозже. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Подправил код шаблона. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

no longer uploading files[edit]

Why i am no longer gonna uploading files, is that the copyright system is the worst ever. i would appearicate if yall had a option this belongs to a company (or person) but NO. my main criticism here is that there is no options about what the image is (like a screenshot, poster, etc.) so until this system gets fixed, i am going to quit uploading files and just edit using Wikipeida instead. TzarN64 (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read Commons:Licensing and copyrights law of your country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

M A Y - MAYDAY E.P[edit]

Why did you delete the cover of my last album release for copyright ?? There was nothing copyrighted on my E.P cover it was an image of my face with an effect on it created In photoshop. May I have an explanation as to why it was deleted. Rsmfilmsuk (talk) 02:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please send permission to Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:VRT/Noticeboard with permissions review and files undeletion. But please read Commons:Project scope carefully before. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright image[edit]

Please remove File:MichiakiTakahashi.webp as its a copyright image obtained from web originally belonged to Oxford University Press. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 07:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done by Túrelio (talk · contribs). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello @EugeneZelenko , I write you this message because I have added some time ago now some photos on Commons to illustrate the different Wikipedias articles (notably one of the city hall of Aulnay-Sous-Bois or of the Struthof concentration camp) but they have been deleted because the resolution of the image for example showed that it was not my work. I can assure you that these pictures are all from my personal work (vacation pictures or others) and if they have a different resolution/size, it's because I add filters or crop them. Please ask me in the future before deleting them. Rio0601 (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Could you please refer to particular files? A lot of you uploads (that were deleted after) originated from Getty Images. Please read Commons:Licensing carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Фото Валентина Головченка[edit]

За яких піддстав вилучені фото до статті про українського вченого-юриста Валентина Головченка. Що це - дрібне хуліганство , заздрість чи параноїдні забаганки ? Невже Українська Вікіпедія зовсім беззахисна від немотивонаго , будь якого, навіть анонімного втручання, до стабільного тексту ? За таких умов аж геть згикає бажання додавати нові статті. 176.37.232.91 11:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Извиняюсь, но украинский не знаю настолько, чтобы на нём писать. О каком файле/файлах идёт речь? В целях самообразования, пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с Commons:Licensing/uk. --EugeneZelenko (talk)

Перевод белорусских сайтов на свободные лицензии[edit]

Добрый вечер, Евгений! Полгода назад я вёл дискуссию на форуме Викисклада по использованию материалов сайта Президента Республики Беларусь, которые как раз стояли на удалении. Если вчитываться снизу страницы, то по идее, материалы являются полностью свободными в любых целях, но с юридической точки зрения Фонда Викимедиа без указания лицензии Creative Commons или других лицензий, разрешающих их коммерческое использование, заливка материалов невозможна. Вы могли бы обратиться в пресс-службу белорусского президента за разъяснениями по использованию фотографий сайта в Википедии? Из всех белорусских сайтов, которые лицензированы по Creative Commons, я смог найти лишь сайты БНТУ и Центральной научной библиотеки имени Якуба Коласа НАН Беларуси.


Если смотреть в архив файлов, то безусловно у него существенное преимущество - сайты президентов России и Украины не сохранили медиафайлов периода президентства Ельцина, а также Кравчука, Кучмы, Ющенко и Януковича, в то время как у белорусского президента медиаархив берёт свой отсчёт с 1994 года, что даёт в себе высокую историческую ценность. Советские фотографии и периода 1990-х-начала 2000-х годов на постсоветском пространстве на Викискладе по свободным лицензиям находятся в огромном дефиците и лишь через десятки лет при переходе в общественное достояние они смогут появиться на ресурсе. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

К сожалению, никак не определено понятие использоваться. По умолчанию закон об авторском праве РБ разрешает цитирование. Посмотрите, пожалуйста, набор полный лицензий Creative Commons. Каждая из них подразумевает использование, но не каждые условия использования совместимы с Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Например, использование фотографий на Викискладе также подразумевает их коммерческое использование. В 2008 году тогда ещё мало кому в голову приходило лицензии Creative Commons, но пресс-служба российского президента в ответ участнику Russavia всё же согласилась на перевод материалов тогда ещё на CC BY 3.0, несмотря на тогдашнее отсутствие свободных лицензий в российском законодательстве, что являлось причиной отсутствия лицензии до 8 апреля 2015 года, когда была запущена нынешняя версия kremlin.ru. Всё же можете попробовать отправить письмо на электронную почту пресс-службы, так как может реализоваться так и позитивный, так и негативный сценарии. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Попробовать можно, но на мой взгляд лучше это делать от имени организации, как это случилось при расширении в РФ свободы панорамы на здания. Что-то мне подсказывает, что добиться желаемого имеет шансы организация, поддерживающая верный курс. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:39, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Вообще-то самые простые участники Википедии могут получать положительный ответ на лицензирование сайтов государственных органов власти той или иной страны. В данном случае по Белоруссии подобных примеров пока не было, значит необходимо приводить примеры со стороны сайтов российских и украинских государственных органов власти. Поэтому в этом случае лучше поздно, чем никогда. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Да, http://kremlin.ru и министерство обороны РФ - хороший пример, хотя не знаю, как их надоумили :-) Про украинские сайты лучше будет промолчать в свете последних событий. Пока за сверхзадачу не возьмусь - для этого нужно время, а пока с этим не очень :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Сайт Минобороны России перешёл на свободную лицензию к 70-летию Победы в Великой Отечественной войне (я смотрел Архив Интернета), Kremlin.ru - 3 октября 2008 года согласно письму пресс-службы президента РФ. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Assistance requested[edit]

We have a relatively new user with significant opinion about how we should do things, and say things to please him. It feels like he is particularly focused on arguing with me. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arthur Morley Francis.png and similar. There is a giant pile of no source, no license and no permission files and I am trying to clear them. When I need help to fix he starts contradicting and being abrasive. I noticed a prior comment from you to him and request your assistance as this does not seem to be reducing by itself. He already took me to ANU for something or another and of course didn't bother to tell me. I think I nominate maybe 2% of images I deal with, I really do not understand why what we have done for years is suddenly such a huge problem. Looking forward to your assistance. Cheers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree with you that this user is problematic. He is too quick to jump to conclusions and in some cases (at least in two historical photos with bogus own works claims tagged by me) without even comprehending information provided in file description. User definitely lacks understanding that people who patrol uploads are just messengers, not cause of problems. In ideal world files should be reviewed within day of upload, so problems could be detected and fixed quickly by uploader. But we live in real world... Most of files I tagged are uncategorized since 2020.
It's hard to tell how to turn this user into more constructive position. Probably discussing his behavior on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems could help at least a little bit.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I think you have seen me here.[edit]

I am Bytextmicheeng. Check me out on my Adobe portfolio. @riizemichele1... Bytextmicheeng (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read Commons:Project scope carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Poster of films[edit]

@EugeneZelenko: I uploaded posters of Jamuna Kinare and Braj Bhoomi but you deleted it. Is there anyway to upload tjem and avoid deletion? Kindly tell. Subhash Chanda Bose (talk) 06:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read Commons:Licensing carefully before next upload. You could not upload such works unless they are in public domain or copyrights owner explicitly allow that. However, you could upload copyrighted works locally to projects that allow non-free media, for example, English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete my photo from commons[edit]

dear sir I did upload a nude photo of mine. But I don't think so I want it to be hung on Wikimedia commons for all. please delete that photo and hide it from my contribution history. The picture is File:Ashprishya.jpg and Please delete the talkpage message with history as soon as possible.DieMob (talk) 18:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. I deleted and oversighted this file and its history. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

LOGOTYPE[edit]

А с чего вдруг, мой логотип нарушает авторские права? Ggtimt (talk) 12:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Пожалуйста, пошлите подтверждение обладанием авторских прав в Commons:VRT (пример: Commons:Email templates). Потом Вы можете обратиться за помощью с проверкой разрешения на Commons:VRT/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Шаблон для логотипов организаций, признанных в Белоруссии экстремистскими[edit]

Евгений, добрый вечер! Вы бы не могли высказать мнение относительно того, чтобы на Викискладе появился специальный шаблон правового предупреждения, но уже касается не коммунистической или нацистской символики, а символики организаций, признанных в Белоруссии экстремистскими? Например, к ним относятся телеграм-канал NEXTA, телеканал Deutsche Welle (накануне это решение принято судом Центрального района Минска), TUT.BY (сейчас переехал на Zerkalo.io, тоже признанного в Белоруссии экстремистским изданием) и т.д. Более того, были внесены поправки в Уголовный кодекс Республики Беларусь, предусматривающие уголовную ответственность за подписку на экстремистские ресурсы и хранению их символики. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 18:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Думаю, что ничего плохого в подобном шаблоне нет. Тот же YouTube вполне себе помечает государственные средства массовой информации РФ. Кстати, а есть ли подобный шаблон для организаций, признанных экстремистскими в РФ (ИГИЛ, "Правый сектор" и т. д.)? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Подобного шаблона для РФ тоже нету. Поэтому при необходимости нужно это выносить на форум Викисклада. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Да, это имеет смысл, благо есть прецеденты в виде {{Nazi symbol}} и {{Communist symbol}}. Вы можете сделать это сами? Или нужна помощь? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Да, нужна помощь. Вдобавок ко всему этому необходимо отнести и символику организаций, признанных в России экстремистскими. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Может имеет смысл сделать один шаблон (например, {{Extremist symbol}}), а страны передавать как параметры? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright photos[edit]

Hello. First, I am sorry for my english because I am not engloshman. I would like to ask you, why did you put the information about deleting to my talk page? And why for example, this: File:Rádiožurnál.webp or this: File:Túto hudbu mám rád.webp photo is copyright and this: File:Dobré ráno, Slovensko!.webp no? Thank you. Gateshebe (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Where license statement on source site could be found? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And where is the licence statement for example for this: File:ORF 1 2019.svg photo on this site?
How can I upload a file of some actor to Wikipedia Commons without deleting?
This particular logo falls under {{PD-textlogo}}. Files above do not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Por qué borraste el archivo del Manchester United[edit]

Por qué Metro fútbol (talk) 17:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Please read Commons:Licensing carefully before next upload. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Motorola Milestone 2 A953 Dock.jpg[edit]

File:Motorola Milestone 2 A953 Dock.jpg, File:Motorola Milestone 2 A953 Keys.jpg I have no idea where the problem is. I took both pictures from my own devices. --Manorainjan (talk) 23:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read Commons:Screenshots and Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Does this mean, that the screen shows a situation of the operating system is a concern?
Isn't Android open source?
I think it clearly comes under "non-copyrighted works of industrial design." both, the smartphone and the OS.
--Manorainjan (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Again, please read Commons:Screenshots carefully. Everything depends on software license, so please dig into subject, because claims like non-copyrighted works of industrial design are obviously incorrect. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Amouranth images from CC BY licensed video[edit]

File:Amouranth wave.png
File:Amouranth 1.png
File:Amouranth 2.png
File:Amouranth 3.png
have been deleted for no reason, these screenshots are from a OnlyFans official video which is released under CC BY license. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBOTSFjVdCk --Panda619 (talk) 08:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Video may be copyrights violation on YouTube. Permission via Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates) from copyrights owner may resolve issue. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion of file "15ai logo.png"[edit]

Hi! You deleted the file 15ai logo.png for supposedly being a clear copyright violation. The file's author has publicly expressed (via Twitter) explicit consent to the work being published here under a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. I've added a link to that tweet to the file metadata though (due to me not being a wikimedia expert) I probably added it in the wrong place. I hope that statement suffices as a sufficient grant of license. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denshee (talk • contribs) 23:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Need help properly adding images[edit]

Hello I am currently trying to upload some images onto Wikipedia do you think you could help me?CanadianHistorian(MMA & History) (talk) 00:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll try, but please read Commons:Licensing and copyrights law of your country first. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Removal of XXXTentacion by Jack McKain.jpg[edit]

Recently you made the rather bold decision to remove File:XXXTentacion by Jack McKain.jpg, which was used as the XXXTentacion infobox image across wikis. This was NOT a copyright violation as it was uploaded by the photographer himself, and the proof of that is linked. https://imgur.com/a/cj9sFTx

I’m not sure if reversals are possible, but if they are, please reverse this. If they are not, let me know. TheXuitts (talk) 20:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please ask photographer to send permission to Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:VRT/Noticeboard with permissions review and file undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Still confused why you removed the image in the first place. The photographer upload it himself. TheXuitts (talk) 06:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's hard to track all web sites in Internet. I suggested better solution already. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fair enough. Thank you for the solution, I'll send an undeletion request. TheXuitts (talk) 7:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

License[edit]

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , Is this file passes the enough criteria to exist in Wikipedia commons? Which was already deleted twice you can check it here. Please let me know. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 12:44, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, this non-trivial logo could not be hosted on Commons. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for your information. Fade258 (talk) 02:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Изображения[edit]

Здравствуйте, почему бы вам вместо того чтобы пытаться меня заблокировать помочь с добавлением этих картинок под правильную лицензию и улучшить статьи, и соответственно Википедию? 87.117.54.55 22:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Вы не могли бы уточнить, о каких файлах идёт речь? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Файлы для статей: Кибер (Marvel Comics), Табита Смит и Страж (Marvel Comics). Файлы: File:Страж (Marvel Comics).jpg, File:Табита Смит.jpg, File:Кайбер.jpg. Я просто не знаю как выложить эти файлы чтобы было видно добросовестное использование не в коммерческих целях. Был бы рад вашей помощи. Dart molt1 (talk) 15:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Такие файлы надо загружать локально в проекты, которые допускают использование несвободных файлов, например, в английскую или русскую Википедии. Сюда подобные файлы загружать нельзя. Смотрите Commons:Лицензирование. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
вы можете помочь мне с добавлением этих картинок в статьи, пожалуйста. Просто я еще новичок в этом деле, нужна помощь знающих людей. Dart molt1 (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Смотрите w:ru:Служебная:Загрузка, раздел Несвободные. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Permission to Dance On Stage[edit]

Hi, according to this: “Bot: Removing c:File:BTS PTD On Stage LA Dec 1 2022.jpg , deleted by EugeneZelenko (Derivative work of non-free content (F3): TV screenshot)”

This actually was not a screenshot of a TV work. I attended the Dec 1, 2021 show and April 9, 2022 show as well as visited a few of the Vegas exhibits. The photos are my own work, taken by me in-person. Please allow me to undo deletion as well as add more that I snapped pictures of, then uploaded, myself. Thanks. Monbmon (talk) 16:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In general, I uploaded photos I took at the Dec 1, 2021 and April 9, 2022 Permission to Dance On Stage concerts within the stadiums. They are not screenshots. Thanks. Monbmon (talk) 16:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These photos were Commons:Derivative works from scene broadcast. Broadcast was performed by other people. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I must clarify that they are not from a broadcast. I attended the concerts myself and those photos are my own. Monbmon (talk) 21:53, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Other people filmed scene and translated picture on screens. You took photo of scene + screens. Please read Commons:Derivative works carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:52, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image on Block Strike[edit]

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , The image present in Block Strike is hard to believe the ownership of the image to this image uploader. What is your opinion on this? In addition see here also. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seems to be non-trivial logo for me. Obviously, copyrights belong to company that developed game. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But in this image particular user had mentioned the owner of this image. Please check it. Fade258 (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If uploader is really copyrights owner (what I'm personally doubt), Commons:VRT is proper way to confirm this. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok, then I will go through it. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 16:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: , Can I use this image on Wikipedia present on this? Just casually I remind you that, at the end of this website there is clearly mentioned that this image is copyrighted as All Rights Reserved? Fade258 (talk) 14:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You need to dig into Wikipedia fair use usage rules. I may be mistaken, but photos of living persons are not allowed, because it's potentially possible to make free alternative. I think link in article about person would be enough. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok for that. If I personally ask to the party nepal to give me the permission for reusing it, and if they give me a permission at this situation can I upload it into the wikimedia commons where credit giving to the party nepal. Please without feeling any angry tell me your opinion on this. Fade258 (talk) 14:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Such permission should be given for everybody. See Commons:Email templates as example. Alternatively, they could change license for photos on their web site directly and remove watermarks. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It means we can do this and Thanks for taking my query into consideration. Fade258 (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
User: EugeneZelenko, Is this image looks fine to exists in wikimedia commons? Fade258 (talk) 16:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'd suggest to at least dig into date of creation. Same for photographer. Obviously, photo was not taken in 2022. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
EugeneZelenko, I have updated the date. Is that fine? Fade258 (talk) 23:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Since photographer is known, it'll be good idea to try to find out dates of life, just to ensure that copyrights tag is valid. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photo of Georgia Benkart[edit]

Hi! You deleted this photo (Georgia Benkart.jpg)even though it was uploaded by the photographer who took the photo and owns all rights to the photo. I realize the photo appears elsewhere on the web with the photographers permission. How can I appeal this. Mvitulli (talk) 15:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Georgia Benkart.jpg[edit]

Please undelete File:Georgia Benkart.jpg which was wrongfully tagged for speedy deletion. It was claimed to be uploaded by the original photographer herself, both on the file itself and elsewhere e.g. en:Talk:Georgia Benkart. The claims of having been copied from a web site, used to justify your speedy deletion, are obviously false: the version uploaded here was of higher resolution than the version that can be found at that web site. You should have noticed the resolution mismatch and the disputed claims rather than just blindly following the speedy deletion tag. David Eppstein (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm chiming in to support Mvitulli and David Eppstein. I take the claim that it was uploaded by the photographer in good faith here, although I understand that the "own work" checkbox is often abused. I want to add that, since Benkart's recent death is getting some attention, and since the photograph was linked from a variety of wikis, it would be good to provisionally restore the image while any steps to establish copyright providence are taken. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please send ask photographer to authorship confirmation to Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:VRT/Noticeboard with permissions review and files undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What will this mindless bureaucracy accomplish? All it will confirm is that a person claiming to be the photographer claims to own the copyright and allows this use. We ALREADY HAVE THAT with the upload from the photographer. Please stop being bureaucratic and do the right thing. And please address the issue that your deletion was BASED ON FALSE PREMISES. The uploaded photo cannot have been taken from the web site because the web site version has lower resolution. David Eppstein (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please look into Category:Copyright violations from time to time. You could be surprised by amount of "own" work there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I know, And yet, Wikimedia commons allows photographers to upload their own work without having to jump through bureaucractic hoops and reveal their personal information every time. You yourself have done so repeatedly: your recently uploaded photos are not marked by OTRS permission. Nobody anonymously tagged your photo as a copyvio and made you jump through hoops to keep it here. In this case, we have a personal attestation from mvitulli (above) that she knows the photographer and that this is the photographer of the work in question. And we have strong evidence that the copyvio claims by anonymous editors were false, by looking at the resolution of the upload, claims that you persistently refuse to address. You are making rationalizations to justify your mistake. In the meantime you are insisting on entering a complicated bureacracy that can take weeks or months to navigate, for an article that is a current candidate for Wikipedia's "in the news" section. The thing you should do is reverse your deletion. The least you could, as a second choice, would be to treat this correctly as a contested speedy, RESTORE IT, and set up a discussion in which other commons editors could see the evidence and reach a decision. Instead, you have made a mistake and you refuse to lift a finger to correct it. That is completely inappropriate behavior for an administrator and behavior that calls the whole commons project into disrepute by making the process of uploading one's own photo so bureaucractic that none will do it. David Eppstein (talk) 19:09, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Lets stop this discussion, I could not add anything new to my arguments above. Repetition of same words will not help. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Commons:Guide to adminship: "You should admit when you make a mistake and do your best to fix it." "Good communication and a willingness to accept feedback are not optional." But if you insist on failing to respond to valid criticism, I cannot force you to be a better admin. David Eppstein (talk) 22:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not obvious mistake. Indeed, you may think otherwise. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:HBL PSL Hamaray Heroes Award 2022.jpg[edit]

EugeneZelenko, Hope you are doing well. The photograph (File:HBL PSL Hamaray Heroes Award 2022.jpg) absolutely belongs to me as I took this picture during the Pakistan Super League cricket matches in Lahore, Pakistan through my mobile cell phone (HUAWEI ALP-L29). Please do not propose it for deletion. Please delete all other pictures but kindly exclude it one (File:HBL PSL Hamaray Heroes Award 2022.jpg) from the list. (I also have sent declaration of contest via email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). Please check Dr Paul Harrison (talk)

Please ask help on Commons:VRT/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Uploads by Amir Aftab[edit]

Hi, The pictures that the candidate deleted are all either from my personal archive or from the books I have, and on the description page, I have fully explained their copyright. Please cancel the delete tag. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir Aftab (talk • contribs) 21:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Claims of own work is incorrect for historical images. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(es) to find out are they in public domain or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PWA Installation Process screenshot is deleted[edit]

User_talk:X7md#Image_I_uploaded_to_use_on_Arabic_Wikipedia_is_deleted

Could you check my userTalk?

about PWA Screenshot, you delete it as non-free software image

File:Screenshot PWA ChromeAndroid install modal.png

Github repo of squoosh app:

https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/squoosh

squoosh (the web-app on the screenshot) is actually free open source software, and even chrome browser is an open source browser... all content is free X7md (talk) 23:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Eugene, this software is in fact licensed under Apache 2.0, so the screenshot should be ok with {{Apache 2.0}}. X7md, a part of the problem here might have been that you licensed this screenshot as Creative Commons while you didn't really create a new work since you just faithfully copied that standard software output. De728631 (talk) 23:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry I'm new here, how should I add the license? just add Template:Apache 2.0 template on the license section? or what should I do? X7md (talk) 23:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You don't need to do anything at the moment. I suggest that EugeneZelenko restores the screenshot and adjusts the licence parameter. Please do not reupload the image, because we can undelete the original file. De728631 (talk) 23:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Saudi Digital History images is deleted[edit]

File:Antame Logo.svg

File:Yarob poster.tif

These images is part of https://raqmin.sa/wikidowen/?lang=en

Project form https://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A7:%D9%85%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B9_%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A_%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%86


(And it's under (public use

Source of images:

wikidowen@saudidigitalhistory.org

Images form email X7md (talk) 23:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the case should I use Template:PD-self or something else?

X7md (talk) 23:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PD-self is only for images that you originally created yourself, and we cannot trace your Commons user account to other websites. If you copy something from the internet, there needs to be a free licence at the source website, or some other exception, why the work is not copyrighted. "Public use" however, is not equal to "public domain". Actually most recent images that are publicly available on the internet are non-free and copyrighted, so they cannot be used here. The problem with the Wikidowen website appears to be that while its goal is to contribute content to Wikipedia, the content of the Wikidowen page itself seems to be non-free as stated in "All rights reserved to the Saudi Center for Digital Content © 2020". That makes copying images from there to Commons impossible. If Wikidowen really wants to contribute useful content for Wikimedia and other such free projects, I suggest that they licence their own content visibly with free licence that includes commercial reuse and the making of derivatives.
So, for now, if you are the original creator of these files, please confirm your authorship by sending an email from an account affiliated with Wikidowen. See COM:VRT for instructions. De728631 (talk) 23:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks a lot 👍. X7md (talk) 23:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Помогите с историческими фотографиями[edit]

Здравствуйте! Файл File:Карта Тбилиси 1834.jpg номинировано на удаление, вопрос такой, если укажу вот эти ссылки на авторство или источник файла, то оно будет снята с удаления? https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_009653808/ https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01009653808 В какой графе указывать, там где «автор»? Еще вот этот файл File:KoshkinNE.jpg здесь я нашел ссылку на книгу, где описана биография и фотография ветерана, информация с официального сайта энциклопедии Министерства Обороны РФ. Вот тот самый источник: Свиридов И.К. 295-я Херсонская трижды орденоносная. Кишинёв, 1980. С. 268. мне там где «автор» указывать вот эту книгу? Guseynov Ruslan 23 (talk) 22:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Смотрите Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia. Лицензии Creative Commons - артефакты 21 столетия. Карта явно в общественном достоянии, но вот фотография, скорее всего, нет. Для фотографии нужна информация о фотографе или хотя бы дата создания. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Подскажите, а вот те примеры которые я предоставил Вам, они подходят или нет? Guseynov Ruslan 23 (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
В первом файле достаточно исправить лицензию. Наводящий вопрос: в какой стране была сделана карта? Второй файл - скорее всего нет. Вряд ли фотография сделана менее 70 лет назад. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Можете ли пожалуйста удалить данные файлы File:KoshkinNE.jpg File:SushkovNik.jpg File:Geydarov Muradali.jpg File:RedgapovTadgibay.jpg File:Николай Павлович Лапин.jpg File:Яков Селиверстович Клименко.jpg с Викисклада? Спасибо. Guseynov Ruslan 23 (talk) 15:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Две последних могут быть в общественном достоянии (возможно, они сделаны во время войны), но надо хотя бы установить дату создания. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Эмблема поместья Курмаевых.svg[edit]

Непонятно требование разрешения на изображение у автора, который загрузил изображение. Что Вы имели ввиду: мне написать в службу поддержки, что я разрешаю себе загрузить файл? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Поместье - это юридическое лицо? Тогда надо оффициальное разрешение. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Нет, поместье — это участок с домом, где живут мои друзья. Они иногда излишек сельхозпродукции продают на ярмарках или фестивалях. Это типовое написание, которое они иногда используют. У них нет юридического лица. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Всё равно полной ясности о принадлежности авторских прав нет (Вам или Вашим друзьям). Поэтому надо будет разрешение через Commons:VRT. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
И как Вы это представляете? Я должен написать в Commons:VRT, что я разрешаю себе загрузить файл на Викисклад? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 04:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Разрешить неоднозначность должен владелец поместья. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
На основании чего такое мнение, если я автор и правообладатель? Есть какое-то правило на Викискладе, которое я не знаю? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 05:41, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Правообладателем может быть и владелец поместья. Для того, чтобы эту неоднозначность разрешить, и нужно уточнение через Commons:VRT. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Я всё же не понимаю: на чем основаны Ваши предположения. Теоретически это может зарегистрировать как товарный знак любая компания или физическое лицо. Тогда мы должны требовать разрешение от всех юр. и физ. лиц: а вдруг это их собственность... Пока точно мною заявлено, что я автор. А остальное — это пока просто предположение из серии «а вдруг...». --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 07:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ещё раз о причинах:
  1. Поместье принадлежит другим людям.
  2. Ваши слова про обладание авторским правами могут быть правдой, а могут быть ложью.
  3. Даже в случае истинности Ваших слов, авторские права могли быть переданы владельцам поместья.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Если Вы меня считаете лжецом (этичность и правило предположения добрых намерений здесь, видимо, не в почёте), то мне с Вами больше не о чем говорить. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 16:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Я всего лишь хотел подчеркнуть тот факт, что участие третьих лиц (владельцев усадьбы) усложняет ситуацию настолько, что нужно её нужно прояснять дополнительно. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyvio images[edit]

Please remove these images copied from Twitter, Facebook and YouTube

Thanks Run n Fly (talk) 18:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please delete the contributions of TheAnonymousWikiEditor as they all are copied from social media sites. I have tagged all of them with links and sites for deletion. Run n Fly (talk) 18:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Important note[edit]

Dear EugeneZelenko, Someone has nominated some of my photos for deletion, knowing that these photos are my own, and the poster in the photo is also my design. The photos are in the public domain, and they are free, especially since they are of a deceased character and it is difficult to photograph them in person. Also, the images were used in most versions of Wikipedia, and deleting the images will lead to a glitch in the character's articles in Wikipedia. Please note that the images are my own photography, and the poster is my own design, and they are exclusive and free images. I wish to remove the deletion template. Pictures : 1 / 2

Greetings and respect --Osama Eid (talk) 04:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This poster seems to be Commons:Derivative works photo. Who is photographer? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello dear EugeneZelenko
and thanks for the reply. I am the photographer, and I uploaded the images to Wiki Commons, so that the images are in the public domain. Osama Eid (talk) 05:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Was you photographer of person or photographer of poster? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear EugeneZelenko ..
I am the one who photographed the poster, and the poster does not contain a trademark or watermark, and it is for a specific event. I photographed the poster with my own phone camera.
Note: I photographed the poster because it is related to an important event, and this event is one of the most prominent events that occurred during this period.
Regards Osama Eid (talk) 15:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, but your photo is based on 3rd-party material. Please read Commons:Derivative works carefully to understand problem. Copyrights notices are not obligatory. Please read copyrights law of your country. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Trimerotropis pallidipennis-Male-5.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Trimerotropis pallidipennis-Male-5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

François Malo-Renault (talk) 12:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop them[edit]

After multiplie explanation, see discussion at their talk-page and on admin noticeboard, the user had again uploaded logo of Indian organization File:MCD Logo New.png that violates commons copyright policy. Their explanation is incorrect, out of context and not as per our policy. They need to be stopped. Run n Fly (talk) 13:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, it's not obvious case for me, because I'm not sure about status of such corporations in India. In some countries municipal symbols are exempted from copyrights. So I'll leave decision for person more knowledgeable in Indian laws. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@CptViraj and Fitindia: for inputs. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just pinged some Indian admin so that they can throw some light on the issue. Hope you will not mind for starting the discussion here. The editor has removed my comments from their talk page. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 15:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's fine to continue in this section. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


202 nominations for deletion?[edit]

Hi Eugene, I am a sysop on fr-WP.

It appears that you have nominated for deletion 202 images (see [1]). The uploader is complaining on fr-WP’s request to administrators’ page (probably he does not make the difference with Commons).

Actually I do not understand your point as the files are paintings and drawings from Émile Malo-Regnault, died in 1936. So public domain, no ?

Regards JohnNewton8 (talk) 05:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok understood : it seems to be a mix of drawings by 3 différent persons, one of them only being dead more than 70 years ago JohnNewton8 (talk) 05:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
License tags must be fixed to keep works in public domain. I tried to explain this to uploader several times. May be you'll be more lucky. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant coutry(ies). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
To situate the 3 members of the family Malo-Renault in relation to the public domain

Hi EugeneZelenko, Bonjour @Yann and Daehan:

Malo-Renault (1870-1938) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malo-Renault => public domain
Émile Auguste Renault, better known by his pseudonym Malo-Renault, was a French pastelist, color engraver and illustrator.
Nori Malo-Renault (1871-1953): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nori_Malo-Renault : not in the public domain before 2024. She maried Emile Auguste Renault ( pseudonym Malo-Renault). She was herself a French etcher, color printmaker.
Jean Malo-Renault (1900-1988) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Malo-Renault ( Review on ancient subjects, architecture or museum: public domain ??) was a French librarian. Jean Malo-Renault was born in Paris on 9 June 1900 He was the son of the pastellist, engraver and illustrator, Émile Malo-Renault, real name Émile Auguste Renault, and his wife Honorine Césarine Tian (Nori Malo-Renault), herself etcher, color printmaker

Cordialement.--François Malo-Renault (talk) 14:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Works of Malo-Renault could be kept if license tags are fixed. If not yet, please do it.
Work of Nori Malo-Renault could be undeleted at January 1, 2024 (Public domain Day).
Jean Malo-Renault should be deleted.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi EugeneZelenko, Bonjour @Yann and Daehan:, I used [PD-US-expired|PD-France] for the works of Malo-Rebault (1870-1938) and I hope I haven't forgotten anything. François Malo-Renault (talk) 04:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re upload[edit]

Hello. You deleted copyrighted images on May 29. This image is present again. ( one with exactly the same name : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Michael_Canitrot.jpg and one with, may be, an another name : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Monumental_Tour_-_Abbaye_du_Mont-Saint-Michel.jpg). Sincerely, --Arroser (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Мёд[edit]

Добрый день. Почему фото напитков в бутылке несвободные? aimaina hikari (talk) 20:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, с w:ru:Производное произведение. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Не понимаю эти мудрые выкрутасы написанные не по-русски. Что конкретно? Дизайн этикетки? Торговые знаки? А фото автомобиля с логотипом на капоте - несвободное? А логотип любой компании на кузове грузовика? Это ж 50-80% склада надо удалить. Я зацензурю этикетки. aimaina hikari (talk) 23:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Смотря какой логотип и какая этикетка. Просто налейте напиток в бокал/рюмку/стакан и сфотографируйте. И сразу отпадут все вопросы о правах третьих лиц/организаций. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Я понял. Просто надо определять порог оригинальности. aimaina hikari (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Емблемите на отборите[edit]

Защо сте премахнали емблемите на отборите, като има източник, откъдето съм ги взел? Моля за адекватен отговор! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simiboom (talk • contribs) 18:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, I don't know Bulgarian well enough to write on it :-( Deleted files were not-trivial logos. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks by gusundol[edit]

Gusundol.png Thanks by gusundol
thanks to removing my works that derivated (Pokemon bread). I will be careful when I upload next time
👻Grrr👻👻Grrr👻 02:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cod MW II Art Work[edit]

Why do you deleted this archive: Call of Duty Modern Warfare II Key Art.jpg --Estuar2 (talk) 17:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please read Commons:Licensing carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:МСК.jpg, File:Пролетарка.jpg, File:Стелла-ВТБ.png[edit]

Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему были удалены данные эмблемы команд из статьи Инкубатор:Чемпионат города Тверь по футболу (6х6)? Fanat 13 (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Это нетривиальные современные логотипы, которые охраняются авторским правом. Пожалуйста, прочитайте Commons:Licensing и Гражданский кодекс РФ. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[edit]

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kannansivaram[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko, from your recent deletion nomination of Files uploaded by Kannansivaram, I have updated the author, source and license of two postal-stamp files (File:PeriyarEVRStamp.jpg and File:Stamp gora.jpg) since they are available under Template:GODL-India, for example, please see this. Would you be able to remove these two from the nomination list. Thanks. Suneye1 (talk) 18:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You could do this yourself by using <s></s> and adding comment that you fixed licensed for them. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Uploading files[edit]

Hello @EugeneZelenko,

Unfortunately, I am in danger of being blocked from the commons and I am afraid to upload more files.

Could you please upload the image below?

https://files2.app.ertflix.gr/files/ellinikes-seires/kart-postal/cart-postal-ertflix-poster.jpg?m=crop&w=570&h=854

Thank you in advance.

Ερευνητής Αλήθειας (talk) 11:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is it movie poster? Most likely it's copyrighted. Please read Commons:Licensing and copyrights law of your country carefully to avoid problems in future. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@EugeneZelenko It is the logo of the TV series Kart Postal. Ερευνητής Αλήθειας (talk) 15:33, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Some WMF projects, like English Wikipedia, allow non-free media, so you could upload poster there. Please read local rules. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aksaray 1989[edit]

Hey, why are u deleting the logo? Göktürk Gmc (talk) 15:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is non-trivial sport club logo. Please read Commons:Licensing carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No problem with licensing. How is the order of importance determined? a lot of unimportant clubs have logos. Göktürk Gmc (talk) 15:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I beg you to help me bro. Göktürk Gmc (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not about importance (== Commons:Project scope), it's about copyrights. If Turkish Wikipedia allows non-free media, you cuould upload this logo there locally. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:ZSU-37-2 Yenisei.jpg[edit]

Dear Eugene,
I turn to you because, not only because of your admin experience, you know very well about copyright rights, especially those of the Soviet Union. There is a deletion process going on (linked above) where a new user quite persistently claims questionable things and starts removing the deletion request tag and arbitrarily declares the deletion discussion as over. Unfortunately, this new user is not result-oriented. Can you please check the facts of that case? Perhaps I am wrong in my assessment of the PD situation. Thank you, Mosbatho (talk) 14:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear Eugene, the user has replied again and rates your forwarded link as unhelpful or incorrect. Instead of that he brings a juristical document in Russian which is beyond my ru-language skills. Can you help with this and clarifiy this situation? --Mosbatho (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Document is preamble to part of Civil Code of Russia related to copyrights (ex-copyrights law). Basically it's {{PD-RU-exempt}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You say what I was thinking about this. So the licensing situation remains the same. --Mosbatho (talk) 14:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm going to ask here as well in case you didn't see my reply on the deletion request.
It seems as if all the relevant questions for the deletion request have been asked and refuted multiple times now. Not to mention the fact that the original reason for this DR has been long since fixed. I specifically ask you as you're the one admin who decided to chime in and was the one who most recently reopened this request citing that it was a, "bogus closure".
At this point, as it did then, the discussion has reached an uncontroversial conclusion and there's no real reason for this to remain open. There's also nothing stopping another deletion request to be opened on this image should another legitimate concern come up, although honestly I fail to see that happening considering the lack of valid issues with any other part of the file. Seeing as there has been about three days of no further activity since I posted this there, if I don't receive any further objections from you on the matter I will again close it by the end of today as per the common's rules on dealing with deletion requests. Sxbbetyy (talk) 10:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sure, it's useless to repeat same arguments. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wow extremely unprofessional of you then. Just outright deleted the image because you can't actually counter anything that was said in defense of the image, and in direct contradiction to what you had "argued" (if you call saying, "no you're wrong" as a real argument). A shame because that file was literally the most popular factual image on its topic. I'd try asking why you thought it was worth deleting, but seeing as your delete comment just restates your prior stance (which was countered twice over) its obvious you don't care what I have to say, regardless of its validity. Sxbbetyy (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You was pointed to mistakes in your logic several times. Please re-read Civil Code of Russian Federation at least in part of protected objects. Photos are explicitly listed there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:51, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"You was pointed to mistakes in your logic several times." At no point did this happen, you just restated your original declaration that what I believed was incorrect, while providing absolutely no proof for your claim (despite the fact that I systematically answered and countered each of your original points with the literal written law). But the record is there for anyone to examine.
"Please re-read Civil Code of Russian Federation at least in part of protected objects. Photos are explicitly listed there" I recommend you do the same, at no point does any part of Russian copyright law give protection to works like this file (as I explained to you and others several times now, this is an unpublished and unattributed work that was created as a part of an official government document, of which are exclusively placed in the public domain as per Article 1259).
From what I can surmise from your limited input, you seem to believe that 1259 only applies to text and not the entire document and that images just qualify for copyright protection in Russia no matter what, which is obviously incorrect (re-read the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to find out why that is if you don't believe me). Although at this point I've literally cited the written law and you've still dismissed it, and to save face I doubt you'll just outright admit your wrong even if you see it for yourself. A shame it has devolved to this point though as this certainly puts a bitter taste in my mouth on how things are handled in the Commons, my first issue with a file of mine and turns into a complete dumpster fire. Sxbbetyy (talk) 04:35, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Civil Code of Russia (and {{PD-RU-exempt}}) explicitly tells kind of documents. Photos are not mentioned there, so any extrapolation is incorrect. Since arguments are repeated, let stop discussion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"Civil Code of Russia (and {{PD-RU-exempt}}) explicitly tells kind of documents." Yeah you repeating this as an answer for like the fifth time in a row tells me you don't really seem to understand/care about anything I'm saying. So yeah I'll just leave whatever happens up to the undeletion thread, no point talking to a brick wall. Sxbbetyy (talk) 15:51, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You chose new venue, so it was necessary to clarify situation for people who was not involved. Your arguments there were not original either. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Are you just trying to get the last word in to look like you're correct? You keep making these kinds of statements like nobody else can read what was previously said, it just looks unprofessional and comes of as deceptive. People can simply read the deletion thread that I already linked, get the entire context behind the conversation, and then make their own decision. They don't need to parse through biased statements with little to no context, which thus far is all you've offered there. But again, this is a topic better suited for said thread and not here. Sxbbetyy (talk) 16:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help required[edit]

Hi, I have found a list of copyright violation of images from editors Malanchastar (talk · contributions · Statistics) and DoraShin15 (talk · contributions · Statistics). I have already tagged them with original sources. Please help to remove them. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for help! Done for first user. Somebody else do same for second user. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted photo about and from Indonesia[edit]

Dear EugeneZelenko, by chance I saw a list of deleted photo about and from Indonesia. These are mainly photos from before 1930/1950 and even before 1900. 95% of the images are certainly in the public domain. They come from the Dutch archives and many are already in Commons. For example, there are still at least 200,000 uncatalogued photos from Indonesia. See here Category:Southeast Asian & Caribbean Images (KITLV), Leiden University Library, Category:Images from the Tropenmuseum en Category:Fotocollectie Dienst voor Legercontacten Indonesië

Presumably the user is not fluent in English, then uploading will be very difficult. Also, I understand that everything is done from a cell phone. I personally find uploading very annoying, with the result that I rarely upload. When photos are in the public domain, they cannot be classified as your own work without your own creative contributions. Many photos are only cropped. My question is or the photos can be restored to Commons:Deletion requests/Files or User Zul muhaimin hmn so that the photos can really be reviewed.

File:Holmbreg.jpg is an image of nl:Otto Carel Holmberg de Beckfelt (1794 - 1857) en kan gelijk terug. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Indonesia. Thanks in advance, Lidewij (talk) 15:25, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure, deleted files could be restored, but somebody need to work on providing proper source and license information. Local copyrights laws are written on native languages, so absence of knowledge of English should not be considered as excuse. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
EugeneZelenko, I can add appropriate sources. I (70+) had English on school, but understanding what is asked, when uploading pictures is another chapter. My dyslexia doesn't make it any easier. All incomprehensible to insiders. It's not that simple with, you can read it, so you can understand it. Regards, Lidewij (talk) 15:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)PS I see thatReply[reply]
Dear EugeneZelenko, I see that yesterday something important has been lost, with my first contribution, the list of the deleted entries. See User talk:Zul muhaimin hmn. Regards, Lidewij (talk) 10:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Actually not all files were deleted, but source/license information was not fixed. So please handle them first and after that I'll restore next batch. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hola, me puedes ayudar?[edit]

Hola EugeneZelenko, me han bloqueado en Wikipedia por culpa de mi hermano menor, que se creo una cuenta de Wikipedia diciendo que era un bot y que mi página de usuario era el propietario. Hace poco me lo dijo en relajo burlándose.

  • Quería saber si me puedes hacer el favor de escribirle al bibliotecario RUY, explicándole lo mismo que acabo de mencionar porque me restringieron la edición y no puedo escribirle a nadie.

Por favor y gracias!

▮ ⇶ ProGamerJoab⚔YT ▮ ↯THE HACKER↯ ● 🗣️¿Hablamos? 17:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lo anterior es para que solicites mi desbloqueo, te lo pido por favor!
▮ ⇶ ProGamerJoab⚔YT ▮ ↯THE HACKER↯ ● 🗣️¿Hablamos? 17:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, I don't know Portuguese :-( Was IP-address blocked or checkuser found that both accounts were from same location? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:18, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Si, con SVU, recuerda que mi hermano accedió en mi propia PC que estaba encendida y la IP no cambia.
RUY no me quiere creer y no sé que hacer, yo no tengo malas intenciones contra la WIKI, este bloqueo es erróneo.
Por favor ayudame, gracias!

▮ ⇶ ProGamerJoab⚔YT ▮ ↯THE HACKER↯ ● 🗣️¿Hablamos? 00:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You could request IP-address exemption for your user name, but you need to keep your account secure: change password and do not save it in browser cache, so your brother will not be able to use it with bad intentions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you very much for your help!
▮ ⇶ ProGamerJoab⚔YT ▮ ↯THE HACKER↯ ● 🗣️¿Hablamos? 19:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Carol Blood[edit]

Hey, I started a deletion request for the image, but I saw you deleted it already. Could you close this request? Thanks. reppoptalk 18:25, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done by bot. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:52, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Media without a license[edit]

Hi, It is not helpful to tag files with license as "Media without a license", i.e. [2]. Right, the license is wrong, but your tagging is also wrong. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What tagging should be right on you opinion in such cases? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A regular deletion request is the way to go, as these are not obvious copyright violations. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Why it's not obvious when US Army personnel is credited in description? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:27, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SMA Labschool Unsyiah Logo.png[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko. Would you mind taking a look at File:SMA Labschool Unsyiah Logo.png? It's the same logo as File:SMA Labschool Unsyiah.png which you deleted earlier today as a copyvio. I think this is a new user who simply doesn't understand COM:L and COM:Own work, and they did ask for help at COM:HD#Copyright help regarding File:SMA LABSSCHOOL UNSYIAH LOGO.svg. However, they never responded so it's not clear they understand why their uploads are problematic. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. Thank you for help! Looks like this logo was uploaded after I deleted previous uploads. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]