Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fernando Quiroga Palacios.jpg
25 years is not enough in Spain. It is necessary 80 years to go to the public domain. . HombreDHojalata.talk 11:10, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Keep A simple picture in Spain is only 25 years. Yo can read the justification in this link:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:PD-Spain-photo --
- Brevemente, la ley española distingue entre dos tipos de fotografía: la obra de arte y la mera fotografía. ¿Cuándo es una obra de arte una fotografía? El Tribunal Supremo Español requiere originalidad (único, extraño, fuera de lo común), creatividad (talento, inteligencia, ingenio, invectiva, o personalidad que convierte a la fotografía en una creación artística o intelectual) y novedad relevante. Para el Tribunal Supremo Español, lo raro es la fotografía artística y lo normal la mera fotografía. Al considerar que debe ser original(lo original es escaso) obliga a considerar de una manera restrictiva que una foto sea arte y tenga derecho a la Propiedad Intelectual.
En la foto que nos ocupa no se dan los razgos necesarios para considerarla una obra de arte según el criterio del Tribunal Suplemo, solo sería, en sus palabras, una foto con "mera corrección técnica" y, por tanto, mera fotografía. Gracias
- Briefly, Spanish law distinguishes between two types of photography: the work of art and simple photography. When is a photograph a work of art? The Spanish Supreme Court requires originality (unique, strange, out of the ordinary), creativity (talent, intelligence, ingenuity, invective, or personality that turns photography into an artistic or intellectual creation) and relevant novelty. For the Spanish Supreme Court, the rare thing is the artistic photography and the mere photography is normal. When considering that it must be original (the original is scarce) it forces to consider in a restrictive way that a photo is art and has the right to Intellectual Property.
In the photo that we are dealing with, the necessary reasons to consider it a work of art according to the criterion of the Supreme Court are not given, it would only be, in its words, a photo with "mere technical correction" and, therefore, simple photography. Thank you--
- véase esta discusión. -----Juan Hispalense (talk) 21:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: In order to be on Commons it must be free to use in both the host country and in the US. Per {{PD-Spain-photo}} this photo would probably not apply even if it was PD in Spain. --Majora (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
