Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Гранітно-степове Побужжя(3).jpg

File:Гранітно-степове Побужжя(3).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2021 at 12:01:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Гранітно-степове Побужжя(3).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Гранітно-степове Побужжя(3).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
•  Info created by Viktoriia Rogovenko - uploaded by Viktoriia Rogovenko - nominated by Luda.slominska -- Luda.slominska (talk) 12:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Luda.slominska (talk) 12:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp. --A.Savin 14:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support not very sharp but neither really unsharp IMO, great compo/subject/light/wow factor, + reasonable size. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:59, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per A.Savin. Way too unsharp for me. --StellarHalo (talk) 21:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very beautiful although the colours look a bit artificial to me. The resolution/quality is so-so, which leads me to be on the fence. Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very noisy -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Pavlo1 (talk) 07:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The water vapor is responsible for the blur here. If you sharpen the image here, it looks like noise. No one could create a sharp image under the same conditions. Good mood and interesting landscape. FP for me.--Ermell (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment But even the nearest foreground isn't sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Neutral Exactly per Cmao20. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 20:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Cmao20, but IMHO Ermell is right, water vapor may explain at least some of the unsharpness. --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per A.Savin -- Karelj (talk) 17:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Ikan's response to Ermell. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)