Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Caelifera sp. (by).jpg

File:ComputerHotline - Caelifera sp. (by).jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2009 at 07:13:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Caelifera sp. (by).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ComputerHotline - Caelifera sp. (by).jpg

•  Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support The colors are beautiful, and this somehow looks different (read: more interesting) than most other insect nominations. -- JovanCormac 07:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 10:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment ID's missing. —kallerna™ 11:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Only Subordinal level :-(. ID is completely missing (it is as if you take a person and say: it is a monkey or an ape or maybe a tarsier (Haplorrhini)). Lycaon (talk) 13:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, per Lycaon. —kallerna™ 19:18, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Is this picture seriously getting voted down because of missing species ID? We all know that ID is not an FP requirement, that is what we have VI for. -- JovanCormac 21:18, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
• But I don't get what the rush is in nominating this? Does this have to appear here two days after upload if there is still work to be done, namely getting a full ID. --Dschwen (talk) 21:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
• People, you don't need to get every of your pictures featured. If the species is lacking, it is simply not interesting enough for FP. →Diti the penguin — 23:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Jörg Groß (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Come on guys. The genus name is given, what more do you want? --Muhammad (talk) 00:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Sorry, clearly shows how little I know. The caption is deceiving and the id to order is very very broad. A minimum of genus should be obtained for easy species and maybe atleast family for the others. --Muhammad (talk) 00:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 20:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods