Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baum -- 2021 -- 9413.jpg

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baum -- 2021 -- 9413.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2022 at 10:38:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baum -- 2021 -- 9413.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baum -- 2021 -- 9413.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 10:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Info This image isn't a crop of File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Dernekamp, Baum -- 2021 -- 9412.jpg. Some comments showed interest in the picture with the tree in the middle. Therefore, I would like to nominate this picture (after the other picture has not been successfully nominated). --XRay 💬 10:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay 💬 10:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support fine with me now. --Ivar (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Pleasant, central composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I miss more ground. A tree has roots (to be evoked). The crop at the bottom is too tight currently. I dare oppose because the image does not really galvanize me, overall. I feel this is more a kind of QI. The other one showed subtle colors in the sky and a more sophisticated composition. This image is too ordinary in my view, not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you for your review. BTW: At the photograph would be only more field at the bottom. More tree root isn't visible. --XRay 💬 05:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

• You're welcome. What I meant by "to be evoked" is like lead room missing, in that case (and in my view). This very thin portion of soil, thick like a thread, is inelegant in my opinion. I feel cramped, my eyes miss space. That's my main objection, however, this plant with white sky and nothing more also appears very common to me. The crop at the top is not generous either. I don't see anything more than a QI -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:35, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Unfortunately, you have set very high standards of moody landscapes with great lighting, and I don't quite see that here. The lighting is dull, the sky overexposed, and the centered framing would work better for me if it weren't for the busy background. I don't think f/16 was necessary either. Aside of reviewing matters, may I suggest you use this photo as leading picture of the en:The_Ladd_Company article ? ;) - Benh (talk) 12:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:36, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I was one of the crazy few who preferred the asymmetrical variant ;–), but this one is impressive enough, too. --Aristeas 11:45, 7 January 2022
•  Support --IamMM (talk) 14:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Aristeas, I strongly preferred the off-centre version but this is still FP to me Cmao20 (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I don't know if the left and right crops are ideal or not (I'd probably recommend closer crops on both sides, partly to eliminate the bush near the right margin), but they're certainly reasonable, and the movement of the tree is so strong that it really makes this photo. To me, this is by far the best composition of the three tree photos you've nominated recently. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:54, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support OK, this one I'll like. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ivar (talk) 14:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia