Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fine-art-nude-downtown.jpg

File:Fine-art-nude-downtown.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2019 at 11:45:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Fine-art-nude-downtown.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fine-art-nude-downtown.jpg

Image is NSFW, click expand to view.

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created, uploaded by Jean-Christophe Destailleur und nominiert by Websteralive -- Websteralive (talk) 11:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I know you gonna oppose it as you are _______. You are encouraged to fill it as you did in schools. All hail jean -- Websteralive (talk) 11:45, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment That is not a good or friendly way to present your nomination and it makes me wonder why you make your nominations. --Cart (talk) 12:03, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

• Adding an  Oppose to my comment due to sock nom. --Cart (talk) 09:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Not good by nominator. Charles (talk) 12:37, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I would vote for it, and maybe I should, but I'm a bit weirded out by the attitude the nominator is presenting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Since the {{Nsfw}} template is not working at present, I've replaced the thumb with a link. Prior consensus of Commons FP community is that readers of this forum wish to have control over when, where and whether to view images that are or may be NSFW. -- Colin (talk) 17:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

• This very similar picture was POTD, which means displayed hundred of thousands times on the home page. I've reduced the size of this thumbnail to 132x132 px like in QIC, but please do not completely hide the image because otherwise these votes and comments seem to belong to the following nomination above. Maybe it's time to fix {{Nsfw}} -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

• @Colin and Basile Morin: added the cot and cob template, hope this solves the issue? ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 14:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

• No, it doesn't, per COM:NOTCENSORED, COM:OMGAPENIS and COM:FPC -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

• I already asked for help with fixing {{Nsfw}} here. Your POTD argument doesn't mean anything other than there are people who lack the first clue to be found anywhere, and indeed when such an image does appear on the front page, there are female editors who complain or who form the opinion that Commons is for boys with too much testosterone and not enough brains. "Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should". -- Colin (talk) 18:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

• Testosterone, like adrenaline, is excellent for the brain. This sex hormone stimulates Eros, and contrary to a widespread thought, intelligence has absolutely no link with a lack of testosterone (or progestogen). Women have estradiol and naturally many of them, feminist or not, would appreciate chippendales FPs on the Wikimedia home page (or more sophisticated works involving sensual contents stimulating consciously or unconsciously their libido). In File:Fine-art-nudesunpine.jpg, the posture is artistic (like dance) and the model as pretty as a blooming flower, thus I assume the pleasure of watching is equally shared between males and females. There are also women photographers like Sally Mann who include nudity in their personal works. All kind of photographies should have a chance to get rewarded here when they deserve. I can't imagine stopping cathedral nominations just because the number of Christian buildings on Commons is disproportionate compared to other religions. {{Nsfw}} was tested on my computer and is currently working well on Chrome, Edge and Firefox -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support I agree with Ikan, but I don't think this should stop me voting for a good photo. I don’t know a great deal about this genre, but the composition and quality seem pretty good to me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:47, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

• Moving to  Oppose per Ikan, also I must say I'm glad we won't be getting more of this nominator's very odd antics at FP. Cmao20 (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support This the best Image that you nominated, but why are you getting mad ? If you don't want us to judge then why are you nominating these ? And please remove that comment -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 19:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per others and my comments above, but please examine your attitude! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not FP technical quality. And I don't like the suggestive pose. Charles (talk) 19:59, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - agree Seven Pandas (talk) 21:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Different, I like the composition and I was tired with the building nominations --Wilfredor (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 22:50, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Charles--BoothSift 22:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

 Support Despite the nominator's comments, please stop. --BoothSift 23:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Moving back to  Oppose after another look at the image and the comments--BoothSift 06:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose blancs brulés et flou sur le visage. --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 06:36, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Support vote removed for now. S. DÉNIEL has a point. Please dial back the highlights a bit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Info Nominator indef blocked, COM:ANU#Websteralive. --Cart (talk) 09:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

I'll just notify @Eatcha: , @ArionEstar: and @Wilfredor: --BoothSift 01:21, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Nomination by sock account evading block. -- Colin (talk) 09:24, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Colin. --Yann (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose 'nuff said above ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 14:40, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)