Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Edith Jasper.jpg

File:Lake Edith Jasper.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2012 at 12:11:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Edith Jasper.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Edith Jasper.jpg

546

36

4601

182

6458

3645

look to the sky to see the dust spots. Ggia (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

5548

49

801

680

6458

3645

stitching error in the sky, what is this vertical change of color-change? Ggia (talk) 19:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

182

814

1153

2807

6458

3645

it think it is too dark. Ggia (talk) 19:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

1432

948

4467

911

6458

3645

look to the trees.. a strong barrel distortion is here. Ggia (talk) 19:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

3969

1264

267

705

6458

3645

another stitching error. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:03, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Info created by Smackaay - uploaded by Smackaay - nominated by CRRaysHead90 -- CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 12:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 12:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Looks fine for me! --Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 18:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Great! GreyHood ^Talk 19:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment this image has several dust spots in the sky (they can be corrected), also seems it has a stitching error at the top right part, there are some parts which are too dark for me.. but the major problem is that in the image there is a big amount of distortion (barrel). BTW the landscape looks very nice.. and looks like a nice place to visit. Ggia (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Stryn (talk) 20:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose please see the image notes. After a correction I can change my vote. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Even though the place is spectacular, there are stitching errors, the sky has an error too, there're dust spots, and many dark areas. As Ggia. Sky looks oversaturated. And finally, horizon is not straight. Too many issues for FP status imo. --Paolo Costa (talk) 22:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral - the stitching errors are really the only issues with this image for me. I'd be happy to support if they were fixed. --Claritas (talk) 22:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral per image notes. But the place is a beautiful. --Stryn (talk) 11:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful scenery. TrebleSeven (talk) 16:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose see my note above. Ggia (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others--Miguel Bugallo 01:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose due to the stiching errors --High Contrast (talk) 01:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 22:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Miguel Bugallo --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per all the comments above. --Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 20:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Nice image. –ElmA (Talk – My files) 15:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 19:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 8 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /--Claritas (talk) 14:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)