Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mirounga angustirostris calling 1.JPG

File:Mirounga angustirostris calling 1.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2019 at 20:40:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mirounga angustirostris calling 1.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mirounga angustirostris calling 1.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info all by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 20:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- grendel|khan 20:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Hip hip hooray! Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support but a bit too bright -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Funny portrait, but would be even better with more contrast. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Motif has FP-potential, but the technical performace isn´t. Too bright and low contrast as mentioned before. --Milseburg (talk) 12:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 15:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg --Charles (talk) 22:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Milseburg -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info This is a levels- and gamma-adjusted version which looks a bit more contrasty; if it's the winner, I'll move it over the original. grendel|khan 19:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment This version is slightly overprocessed. In any case, the light was not optimum, then you'll never get it perfect. What makes the picture great is really the face itself, that speaks very well to humans . So, to improve your light, I think you should consider an intermediate process between this alternative and the first one above. Overlaying these 2 layers on Photoshop with 50% transparency gives quite a good result (or compromise) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Preferred over original. A blend as suggested by Basile would be equally as good, up to you. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support better than original. --Yann (talk) 05:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support ZellmerLP (talk) 10:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 18:48, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 08:57, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support-- Cquoi (talk) 13:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

The chosen alternative is: File:Mirounga angustirostris calling 1 edit.jpg