Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Baptism of Christ (Verrocchio & Leonardo).jpg

File:The Baptism of Christ (Verrocchio & Leonardo).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2017 at 21:03:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The Baptism of Christ (Verrocchio & Leonardo).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Baptism of Christ (Verrocchio & Leonardo).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info The Baptism of Christ is a painting finished around 1475 in the studio of the Italian Renaissance painter Andrea del Verrocchio and generally ascribed to him and his pupil Leonardo da Vinci. Some art historians discern the hands of other members of Verrocchio's workshop in the painting as well. The picture depicts the Baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist as recorded in the Biblical Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. The angel to the left is recorded as having been painted by the youthful Leonardo, a fact which has excited so much special comment and mythology, that the importance and value of the picture as a whole and within the œuvre of Verrocchio is often overlooked. Modern critics also attribute much of the landscape in the background and the figure of Christ to Leonardo da Vinci as well All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Question - I like this photo, and on balance, it looks like it should be a VI in this scope, too. But what is the bright vertical line coming from the top, right of center? It's not in other photos of this painting such as File:Verrocchio, Leonardo da Vinci - Battesimo di Cristo - Google Art Project.jpg and File:Andrea del Verrocchio, Leonardo da Vinci - Baptism of Christ - Uffizi.jpg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

• It's a fold of the canvas, in the first photo you put it you can see I let you know a note, thank you --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:58, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

• Grazie. I wonder if the other photographers smoothed it out in post-processing, which would be wrong. I'll  Support this as a good photograph of an important painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support In regard to the importance of the painting and that my name is John the Baptist. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 03:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 11:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 17:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
• I like painting, but its not whole, you choped some part, especially hands on top. --Mile (talk) 08:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

• Mile I do not understand what you are talking about. Make examples or make notes, so generic reviews are not very useful. The hands are there and are whole, I cut an INFINITE part of the arms because it was black and there was shade, I honestly do not understand what you think I have cut, kindly let me see thank you. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:57, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - You're right. I've struck my support vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:24, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Ikan Kekek If you are not sure of something not to do it, you often change your mind, honestly if you do not vote (positively of course) my photos, I would feel lighter. Of course you can oppose when you want, but in favor it would be best to avoid so you do not take the risk of changing your mind because of your insecurity, thank you.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

• I don't think I owe an explanation for striking my support vote. The reason is obvious from the context. It feels a little strange to be asked not to support your photos if I feel like doing so. I'm not inclined to accede to such a request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

• You are free to vote,but if you're not convinced, as is often the case, stumble ... it's a tip--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

It's very simple: I liked the picture, but when it was pointed out that it was missing a part of the top, I saw that. It has nothing to do with not being convinced: I simply hadn't noticed that the picture wasn't complete until that was pointed out. So what's your tip? To notice everything the first time or to ignore information I hadn't noticed if someone points it out? Either way, thanks but no thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

• In fact... before vote you must check, It's very simple --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:42, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

• No, you should not cut the top off of a painting. If you really want people to boycott your pictures because of your behavior, well... Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

• I do what I prefer for my photos, after more than 100 featureds I think I understand something, then if it is "boycotted" as you say, I do not care. The important thing is that one knows what he does and does not change his mind at every wind change, thank you.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

• Livio why dont you just edit and cut frame out. Use Warp tool. --Mile (talk) 11:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose in favor of the full version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 08:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info This is the full version if you prefer --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, though Livio, if you really don't want my support, strike this line. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

• You are free to vote,but if you're not convinced, as is often the case, stumble ... it's a tip--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Support the frame's also fine with me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 13:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 16:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)