Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Urbanistička cjelina Makarske.jpg

File:Urbanistička cjelina Makarske.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2019 at 12:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Urbanistička cjelina Makarske.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Urbanistička cjelina Makarske.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Croatia
•  Info created by SKas - uploaded by SKas - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 12:24, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- KSK (talk) 12:24, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The shadow on the statue is distracting, and there are many overexposed areas on the houses. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

  Could you take a look at the new version, please--KSK (talk) 14:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

  Better, but the statue still isn't very inspiring and it looks like the highlight recovery was not entirely successful. There are weird grey edges surrounding certain white parts, suggesting that those white areas were permanently lost and the values were simply pulled back from 255 without actually producing any more detail. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Nice composition, but sadly the image quality is not quite as good, the colours are a bit blocky in places and as KoH points out there are a lot of overexposed areas. That said, this could IMO be an FP with better processing from RAW. Cmao20 (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

  RAW file reworked: shadow removed, highlights, saturation, and more. Please take a look at the new version. Thank you for your comments--KSK (talk) 07:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

   Support now. Not perfect, but better in a lot of ways. Thanks KSK for making these corrections. Cmao20 (talk) 14:19, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose A QI, but statue is not excellent composed (too much shadows) --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:37, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

  Could you take a look at the new version, please--KSK (talk) 14:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Boothsift 03:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately for me the statue and the scenery are competing tightly to be the subject. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --LuiKa27 (talk) 07:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:25, 16 September 2019 (UTC)