Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wasserkuppe im Winter.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Wasserkuppe im Winter.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2010 at 14:48:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Rainer Lippert - uploaded by Rainer Lippert - nominated by Rainer Lippert- Info The Wasserkuppe, with 950 meters above sea level the highest mountain in the Rhön and Hesse.
Abstain -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 14:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Great work. I suggest changing your vote to abstain if you are not willing to support as the author. --99of9 (talk) 05:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)- Support Jonathunder (talk) 18:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support This is good stuff and a good stitch. Great light and scenary. It seems for me that the verticals are not quite veritical. Like the antenna on the main dome seems to tilt slightly to the right, the silo tilts slightly to the left and the mast/antenna to the right of that tilt a pixel or so to the right again. Of course it may be so that these structures are not really vertical on the site. I also noticed a white pixel in the blue sky. But these are really just some pedantic observations and not something which needs to be adressed for me to support wholeheartedly. --Slaunger (talk) 22:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, ich kann kein Englisch. Den Pixelschaden habe ich korrigiert. Zu den senkrechten. Das Kraftwerk rechts besteht aus einem Bild. Das Silo selbst ist nach links geneigt, vergleiche mit den Antennen und dem Kamin links und rechts daneben. Die rechte Antenne am Zaun ist eine einfach Konstruktion, steht auch etwas schief. Die Kuppel selbst mit den Antennen links, sind ebenfalls ein Bild. Die Spitze der Kuppel ist etwas schief, vergleiche mit den beiden Antennen direkt links neben der Kuppel, die senkrecht sind. Alle scheinbare schiefe Strukturen sind auch in der Realität so schief. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 09:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Kein Problem. Ich verstehe. Thank you for fixing the pixel and explaining the apparently natural tilt of some of these structures. Grüße aus Dänemark. --Slaunger (talk) 16:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, ich kann kein Englisch. Den Pixelschaden habe ich korrigiert. Zu den senkrechten. Das Kraftwerk rechts besteht aus einem Bild. Das Silo selbst ist nach links geneigt, vergleiche mit den Antennen und dem Kamin links und rechts daneben. Die rechte Antenne am Zaun ist eine einfach Konstruktion, steht auch etwas schief. Die Kuppel selbst mit den Antennen links, sind ebenfalls ein Bild. Die Spitze der Kuppel ist etwas schief, vergleiche mit den beiden Antennen direkt links neben der Kuppel, die senkrecht sind. Alle scheinbare schiefe Strukturen sind auch in der Realität so schief. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 09:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support although I do think the verticals are a little out it does not have any real effect on a well caught scene for me --Herby talk thyme 09:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support I like the colors. The radar station makes the composition really nice. --Aktron (talk) 10:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support ■ MMXX talk 00:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Oops, almost forgot this image. Nice. Nikopol (talk) 14:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas
