Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Édouard Baldus, Pont Royal and Louvre - NYPL Digital Collections.jpg

File:Édouard Baldus, Pont Royal and Louvre - NYPL Digital Collections.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 14:45:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Édouard Baldus, Pont Royal and Louvre - NYPL Digital Collections.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Édouard Baldus, Pont Royal and Louvre - NYPL Digital Collections.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1900
•  Info created by Édouard Baldus - restored, uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Why are you nominating two versions of this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

• Is the alternative Édouard Baldus's work? No it isn't. {{Retouched}} compulsory. added -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
• But good question -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

•  Support as quite a good photo for that time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. It’s interesting to see that the verticals are leaning out a bit. Later, around 1900, most cityscape photographs carefully avoid leaning verticals (similar to what we usually request on Commons for new photographs as “perspective corection“ ;–), but it seems that this rule was not yet used in Baldus’ time. --Aristeas (talk) 09:53, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support for the historical value.--Peulle (talk) 08:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan Kekek and Peulle --Llez (talk) 09:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose only one image is displayed so I'll oppose both for crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info 16:9 aspect ratio.
•  Support --Paris 16 (talk) 14:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Cropping a master's work like this is nonsense. In the content eliminated, is a cart of great importance. Overall the composition is definitely better originally with the line of the river starting at the bottom right angle -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree that it doesn't make sense to judge a historical photo except in its original composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose only one image is displayed so I'll oppose both for crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1850-1900