Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AlegoriaalRioParanaMonumentoalaBandera-RosarioArgentina-03673.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2016 at 00:30:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
- Info all by me -- Ezarateesteban 00:30, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 00:30, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I'd like a little more room above his head. Was that not possible? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Ikan, yes but a bit, next is the top of the sculpture Ezarateesteban 11:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support − Meiræ 14:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow for me. Besides this, the crop is too tight, and verticals are not straight. --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Question Isn't there a violet tint here, as compared with this one? --Cayambe (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Adjusted the WB and crop Ezarateesteban 18:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Face out of focus, poor crop (too little space on top, too much on bottom). Sorry but with such an easy to shoot FPC I expect no less than flawless perfection. --Kreuzschnabel 19:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose A QI but don't see enough special to be FP. -- Colin (talk) 19:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I don't see anything special that would take this to FP. cart-Talk 19:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. INeverCry 20:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Hi all. I uploaded the original DNG file, do you think doing anything on it the picture reach FP status? I don´t see the head out of focus.
Source materials for this file are available from Commons Archive: |
- Comment The head is definitely less sharp than, for instance, the penis. (No hint intended as to what the artist focuses on a man’s body.) Whether it’s a DoF problem or a poor lens, the fact remains. --Kreuzschnabel 10:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Looks like lens-related corner unsharpness, but I've seen far worse; this is OK IMO. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The lower left corner needs to be cropped. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, King Done Ezarateesteban 16:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results: