Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 49-57 HDR PAN.jpg

File:Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 49-57 HDR PAN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2018 at 08:04:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 49-57 HDR PAN.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 49-57 HDR PAN.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info Exterior of the Pula Arena, an amphitheatre located in Pula, Croatia. This Roman edifice was constructed between 27 BC and 68 AD and is among the largest surviving Roman arenas in the world. At the same time, is the best preserved ancient monument in Croatia and the only remaining amphitheater having all four side towers with all three Roman architectural orders entirely preserved. All by me, Poco² 08:04, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 08:04, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
• You have double border in good part of, like echo (anoted). Similar down in Ljubljanica. Bad equipement ? I think its a bit too yellow. --Mile (talk) 08:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

  I uploaded a new version improving that halo, Mile, Poco² 17:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support awesome --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Great lighting -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:04, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support All your photos of the amphitheatre are amazing. - Benh (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I suggest you harmonize the WB between that one and File:Anfiteatro_de_Pula,_Croacia,_2017-04-17,_DD_58-63_HDR_PAN.jpg for the article (artistically, it doesn't really matter in my opinion) - Benh (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

  Benh, Mile: I've reduced the yellows Poco² 17:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --fedaro (talk) 13:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 15:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Nice light, and a very interesting perspective! -- Manudouz (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 12:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

  Basotxerri, I got rid of the car on the left (doing some cloning work instead of croppint it), thanks, Poco² 17:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- HalfGig talk 21:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose So much to like about this. I could almost forgive the almost psychedelic color and the evidence of processing. But ... the weird bright area on the right looks almost like the building is growing fur there, and it is matched on the left by an area in the window where the stone looks bluish-gray. Daniel Case (talk) 23:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 13:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture