Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bieszczady - view from Połonina Caryńska (2016) 03.jpg

File:Bieszczady - view from Połonina Caryńska (2016) 03.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2017 at 13:44:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bieszczady - view from Połonina Caryńska (2016) 03.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bieszczady - view from Połonina Caryńska (2016) 03.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I like this composition. Was the sky greenish like that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The foreground shadows are too much for me, and I think there is a green tint in the WB. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Agreed, on my monitor the colors need correction. The sky in File:Bieszczady - view from Połonina Caryńska (2016) 02.jpg, taken a few minutes earlier, appears more natural. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Removed my support vote, pending reply to my question and/or possible correction of the white balance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The WB and foreground shadows are not a problem for me. The discordant wooden railing in the front is. Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much shadows in the foreground --Michielverbeek (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)