Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bridge Vittorio Emanuele II and dome of San peter.jpg

File:Bridge Vittorio Emanuele II and dome of San peter.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2015 at 15:43:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bridge Vittorio Emanuele II and dome of San peter.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bridge Vittorio Emanuele II and dome of San peter.jpg

214

283

4214

2844

4618

3248

crop suggestion --Kreuzschnabel 22:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination All by -- LivioAndronico talk 15:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico talk 15:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Buildings at the borders are slightly leaning inwards (pincushion distortion?). Can you correct this? With the correction a clear pro for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Uoaei1,thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 21:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me now. --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment I don’t like the partially visible tree on the left edge and the crane to the right. Crop suggestion added. --Kreuzschnabel 22:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Kreuzschnabel,thanks for review --LivioAndronico talk 22:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Much better but still below FP level I’m afraid. Partially due to the direction of light, partially due to composition, it’s altogether too flat, lacks depth for me. --Kreuzschnabel 16:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

• Next time Kreuzschnabel if you're not decided is useless to suggest a crop and then complain of another, it is inconvenient and wastes time to people for nothing.--LivioAndronico talk 09:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose The crop would help, but even so the sky on the left is too blown for me. Daniel Case (talk) 22:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Better in this way Daniel? Thanks --LivioAndronico talk 22:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Better but not good enough. Jebulon put his finger on why. I would also add that, compositionally, the dome doesn't stand out enough from the rest of the skyline to serve as an anchor for that side of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose The light comes from the wrong direction. Bad time of the day for this one, I'm sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 00:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I would definitely support if the light situation was different. You should go there again to take the picture in the early morning hours when the light comes from east. It's absolutely worth it! This is one of the most beautiful places for taking photos at all. --Code (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)