Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral of Gniezno (20).jpg

File:Cathedral of Gniezno (20).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2024 at 14:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral of Gniezno (20).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral of Gniezno (20).jpg

35

12

3671

4251

3717

5203

Suggested crop #1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

314

35

2776

4227

3717

5203

Suggest crop #2 -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Question HDR? --Laitche (talk) 16:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

  No, it's not HDR, just a simple photo. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)::

Thanks!  Support --Laitche (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Good composition, quality and light Cmao20 (talk) 17:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 17:57, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose The bright light in the foreground. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 06:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose The ugly (industrial) lantern in the foreground seems to be the main subject of the photograph. Too distracting in the composition, in my opinion. I would suggest to propose an alternative with the building only in its blue hour sky. Two possibilities: 1) cropped at the bottom and unchanged width, 2) cropped at the bottom and tighter framing, from the right of the leftmost lantern to the left of the naked tree (2743 x 4268 px only but nice aspect). See notes -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others: distracting light and also for me a bit unbalanced composition. Sure the blue hour light is nice, but I'm missing something more. I'm sorry, but for me it's just QI. --Kadellar (talk) 10:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per others. The foreground light is distracting. Yann (talk) 11:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Alternative

@Laitche, Cmao20, ArionStar, Charlesjsharp, Llez, Basile Morin, Kadellar, and Yann: new version uploaded. Tournasol7 (talk) 16:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Much better. Yann (talk) 20:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 21:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment I made a more sky version [1]. What do you think about it? --Laitche (talk) 23:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Laitche's version is better. ★ 00:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

  @Laitche and ArionStar: Laitche's version is also nice, but I would like to save current version as alternative. Thanks for understanding. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

  Okay :-)  Support --Laitche (talk) 11:08, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Support This version is fine for me. There is enough sky over the thin arrows. And the picture is not {{Retouched}}, that is also better. Appealing lighting and nice blue hour -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful and atmospheric blue-hour scene. --Aristeas (talk) 07:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Natsuikomin (talk) 02:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:55, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC))

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Poland

The chosen alternative is: File:Cathedral of Gniezno (20-cropped).jpg