Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2015 -- 4954.jpg

File:Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2015 -- 4954.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2015 at 12:01:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2015 -- 4954.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2015 -- 4954.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 12:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 12:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support yes! --Ralf Roleček 12:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support What a mood! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose A nice mood to be sure, but there's so much going on—the building, the sunrise, the snow, the bare trees—that it's hard to tell which one of them wants to be the subject. Daniel Case (talk) 16:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I see here only a rather ugly building, even if the sunset/sunrise is nice.--Jebulon (talk) 23:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately, I think the sunsetsunrise isn't helping here, it makes the building look even darker in contrast. — Julian H.^✈ 12:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Info It's a sunrise ... see the categories. Daniel Case (talk) 16:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

• Or the capture time :D - Benh (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

It's sunrise. I prefer sunrise instead of sunset.--XRay ^talk 17:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Gah, again. I never learn. Apologies. — Julian H.^✈ 06:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

•  barely support because it's good technically and because I like sun(rise|set)s and that one looks beautiful, making up for a nice mood. But where it's placed is unfortunate. - Benh (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Well done technically, and it's got wow. It could have been done with less distortion, but I'm still for it. Thennicke (talk) 12:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support There are enough reasons still for support, e. g. the beautiful light. --Tremonist (talk) 14:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with opposers, trees on left are problem, and appearance itself isn't so interesting.--Mile (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /KTC (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)