Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of the Prophet (Temple Mount, 2008).jpg

File:Dome of the Prophet (Temple Mount, 2008).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2016 at 10:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of the Prophet (Temple Mount, 2008).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dome of the Prophet (Temple Mount, 2008).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info 50px|link=User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2/Nomination of featured images on Arabic Wikipedia Project Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by Godot13 - uploaded by Godot13 - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support--Morning (talk) 13:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Obvious QI but no excitment -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment While I'm flattered by the nomination, it's not one that I would have made. It's a high EV structure, and every subsequent trip there has been some kind of obstruction preventing a clean shot, but I have to agree with Alvesgaspar above.--Godot13 (talk) 05:12, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very nice work and a cool little building. QI and VI already, which fit it perfectly. lNeverCry 05:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice litte dome and worthy of the QI and VI, but it's not an FP for me. The light is good but a bit uninteresting, there is some residual CA, half a coil of black cables (or something) could have been cloned out and I could do without the 3/4 man in the background. Sorry, no wow. cart-Talk 10:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Gnosis (talk) 15:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Alvesgaspar. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)