Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Finnish Air Force Hawker Hurricane warbird and US Navy T-6 Texan warbird in flight over Finland.jpg

File:Finnish Air Force Hawker Hurricane warbird and US Navy T-6 Texan warbird in flight over Finland.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2017 at 05:10:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Finnish Air Force Hawker Hurricane warbird and US Navy T-6 Texan warbird in flight over Finland.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Finnish Air Force Hawker Hurricane warbird and US Navy T-6 Texan warbird in flight over Finland.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
•  Info created by Peng Chen - uploaded by Dura-Ace & Revent - nominated by ~riley -- ~riley (talk) 05:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- ~riley (talk) 05:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
• Moderate  Support, as I like both the planes and the scenery, but the picture is a bit small. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent --The Photographer 14:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Question - This may be a newbie question (and perhaps the wrong forum, but relevant to the nomination): how foolproof is FlickreviewR? FlickreviewR 2 (pinging Bryan Zhuyifei1999 sorry -- didn't notice the old bot was blocked). This is the third time in the last few days I've followed a Flickr link from a FP or FPC and found "all rights reserved" (the last two were POTY candidates). Presumably Flickr allows changing license. Of course, the CC license is irrevocable, but for that to hold up to a takedown request (or worse) we'd need evidence it was was indeed published as such. Is the bot's review sound enough that it would hold up? Seems like it may be worth making a snapshot/archive at the same time? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  15:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Rhododendrites the photo was uploading using Flickr2Commons. This tool will only upload files from Flickr which are marked as CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and CC-0. That's the first step. Then the second step if the Flickr review by bot. You can be sure that this image was CC licenced on Flickr at the time of upload. It's pretty solid in that regard. 220.253.213.161 18:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan - on the small side, but a wonderful image. The planes are sufficiently sharp so that there's still plenty of detail even in the absence of great resolution. No qualms about licensing for reasons outlined above. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Looks almost CGI-esque, especially on the water. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--Dura-Ace (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Majestic! --Gnosis (talk) 18:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 21:42, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport