Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Galanthus nivalis (snowdrop) flower FS17.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Galanthus nivalis (snowdrop) flower FS17.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 27 May 2009 at 11:59:39
- Info created by MichaelMaggs - uploaded by MichaelMaggs - nominated by MichaelMaggs -- MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral Good composition but the focus is not regular and background is very artificial. --Muhammad (talk) 12:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support, fantastic colour contrast and good technical quality. --Aqwis (talk) 13:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 17:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic. It is even possible to see some details of the room in one of the drops :) --Tiago Fioreze (talk) 18:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad background, dust spot and room on the drops. Sorry. —kallerna™ 16:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose As kallerna. Lycaon (talk) 17:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support /Daniel78 (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose For me, this is spoiled by the obvious indoor environs. It looks like it has been intentionally sprinkled with water to be "pretty". (That may not be true, just the idea I get from it.) I far prefer for natural subjects to also be in as natural an environment as possible. Maedin\talk 19:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose so close ... but the unatural setting (especially water reflections) doesn't work well --ianaré (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Images of flowers are much better with a natural background (usually nicely blurred due to DOF) - red doesn't work for me - sorry --Tom dl (talk) 21:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 (talk) 16:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
OpposeWould have looked better in black background. --Swati.360 (talk) 06:33, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Vote is late, sorry. Lycaon (talk) 07:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)