Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia San Miguel Arcángel - Tazacorte 05.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2019 at 05:57:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 05:57, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 05:57, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Oppose This angle doesn't quite work for me; too much of the building is obscured.--Peulle (talk) 08:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment I didn't want to depict the church as a whole but the combination of the church facade and the flowers. I have also pictures of the church, see here and here, but I think, this one is more aesthetic. --Llez (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Extreme angle. Not a striking composition. A bit of a tree and a bit of a church, but nothing clearly here -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support I like this. The red of the tree contrasts nicely with the colours of the rest of the pic. I always prefer images of churches when they're shot from a sideways perspective like this one rather than face-on, as I feel you can appreciate what it actually looks like better. Cmao20 (talk) 21:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support If I take this as a picture of the church only, I am not convinced, but if I see it as a beautiful street view with flowers, the rich ornaments and the church, I really like it. --Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose If this is meant to be a pic of the church (which is what the title suggests), then the blooming foreground is WAY too dominant, and is covering up half of the main subject. If the foreground was taken in on purpose, why is it cut off? I cannot see a clear message here. --Kreuzschnabel 18:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 19:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
