Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia del Santo Cristo, Praia da Vitória, isla de Terceira, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-24, DD 56.jpg

File:Iglesia del Santo Cristo, Praia da Vitória, isla de Terceira, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-24, DD 56.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2020 at 22:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia del Santo Cristo, Praia da Vitória, isla de Terceira, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-24, DD 56.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia del Santo Cristo, Praia da Vitória, isla de Terceira, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-24, DD 56.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
•  Info Christ's Church, Praia da Vitória, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal. The original temple dates from 1521 but it was completely destroyed by a fire in 1921 and rebuilt 3 years later, as you can see in the facade. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 22:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very impressive photo of a beautiful motif. Minor compressions/distortions are forgiveable seeing you were probably standing as far back as you could to get it in the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 01:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Certainly beautiful, but the top isn't very sharp and of course this photo has a lot of competition from other photos of church facades. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Exceptional colors. Axel ^(talk) 12:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 14:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good light conditions, but low wow effect, lack of sharpness and distortion at top and unfortunate bottom crop. --Ivar (talk) 19:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

• Ivar, Ikan Kekek  New version uploaded I've improved the distortion on the top (to my defense I've to say that there was no further room at the back to minimize that distortion), the sharpening and the bottom crop --Poco a poco (talk) 20:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks for the improvement. I'm still not supporting, but it looks like most others feel that it meets the standard for an FP of a church facade. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Quite honestly, I think this is a very good photo but not one of the greatest on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

• This vote feels lile a punch in the face. Ikan Kekek I regret now having "invested"my time to improve the image Poco a poco (talk) 21:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

• I'm sorry you feel that way. Nothing personal on my part. You're one of the great photographers on this site, and you would certainly remember how many of your photos I've voted for and nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Bottom crop is now better, but other disadvantages are still there. I agree with Ikan, it's not one of the finest church images on Commons. --Ivar (talk) 05:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Generally fine, a bit oversharpened IMHO but that might be a matter of taste. What really doesn’t please me is the heavy distortion of the bell in the upper right. --Kreuzschnabel 14:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose A great effort, but unfortunately it doesn't overcome the distortion and unsharpness at the top. Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal