Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ivan the Great Bell Tower in Moscow Kremlin 1.jpg

File:Ivan the Great Bell Tower in Moscow Kremlin 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2017 at 13:44:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ivan the Great Bell Tower in Moscow Kremlin 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ivan the Great Bell Tower in Moscow Kremlin 1.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Dmitry Ivanov - uploaded by Dmitry Ivanov - nominated by Dmitry Ivanov -- Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 13:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 13:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is not the place to photograph this building. Charles (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

 Question @Charlesjsharp: , could you point to examples of a better location for this shot? Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Sure,i'm curious too--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Just Google great bell tower moscow. Charles (talk) 22:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

 Comment @Charlesjsharp: Yes, a view from the Sobornaya (Cathedral) Square (I think you mean it) is more informative: for the whole building is seen. This view isn’t so informative, but (I suppose) it has some “visual advantages”: the picture of the white tall tower “growing from the forest” can create a certain mood. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 00:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Qualified support per Dmitri. "Qualified" because I think a crop of a lot of that empty space on the right would help, but if the photographer has a reason for it, I defer. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the facade is too soft. I wouldn't have promoted this photo on QIC either. --A.Savin 15:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose no wow (I don't think this light and composition are the best for it) + issues with sharpness. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm not wowed either. The main subject is centered, the left towers are not really contributing to the composition since they are significantly visible but only partially (that's somehow irritating). Charles is probably right and lighting/sharpening are not outstanding either as Ivo mentioned. Poco² 17:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose--Verde78 (talk) 10:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 01:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)