Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Khost children in 2010.jpg

File:Khost children in 2010.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2012 at 11:34:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Khost children in 2010.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Khost children in 2010.jpg

•  Info created by Staff Sgt. Andrew Smith (U.S armed forces), nominated by 122.169.50.222
•  Support --Sasha Krotov (talk) 01:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- I like the composition. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support very nice image--David საქართველო 06:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support per Bruce1ee. Tomer T (talk) 08:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Nice propaganda from the US military, but well... Yann (talk) 10:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  OpposePer Yann, except the "but well...". Parent's consents ? Personal rights warning ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

  I'm afraid many of these children have no parents--Sasha Krotov (talk) 06:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Yann and Jebulon. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jebulon. / Achird (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support very nice aesthetically, has EV.. of course.. US miliatary propaganda... Personal rights warning etc.. should not be arguments for a FPC IMO.. may-be for a deletion request... but not here. Ggia (talk) 23:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support our troops. USA! USA! USA! - But seriously, this is one of the best shots in Category:Children of Afghanistan so far. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 04:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  SupportGood -- Raghith 08:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment When I nominated this picture I was acutely aware that this was USM work. But despite that this work humanizes and highlights the Afghans. Secondly its hard to say 'kill all Muslims', 'bomb,bomb!' while looking at this picture.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.179.141.235 (talk • contribs)
  • So it is a non-neutral nomination with a political purpose ??--Jebulon (talk) 15:08, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wonderful picture. Really, it's a brilliant shot. TrebleSeven (talk) 10:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

  about you comment, Commons:Featured_picture_candidates General rules: Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.--Sasha Krotov (talk) 13:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I don't mind who took the photo. It's a featured picture IMO. --Dr.Haus (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Composition is excellent. Royalbroil 02:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose License at source restricts commercial use Images uploaded to Flickr are for the free intended use for dissemination by media outlets and all other interested persons or organizations for newsworthy or educational media products. They are not, however, and in accordance to Flickr policy, to be used with the intention of reproducing and selling the images without prior consent of the releasing authority, or by extension, the photographer whose name should be included in the description. Please credit "Photo by ISAF Public Affairs" unless otherwise noted. The releasing authority is the Public Affairs Officer for ISAF Headquarters or any persons designated by the Public Affairs Officer, any of whom can be contacted at pressoffice@hq.isaf.nato.int. [1] Gnangarra 09:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

  Created by U.S. Army Photographer (not another NATO Army Photographer) which means this photo is public domain. Sasha Krotov (talk) 10:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

  not according to the source used, please link to a US military source for this image as there is nothing on the source page that identifies the photographer[2]. Gnangarra 11:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

  see Exif2 Info[3], it consist all information about author. Sasha Krotov (talk) 11:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

  that just means its a copy violation at source, as such we cant link to it. Find a US military alternative Gnangarra 12:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Jebulon --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tamba52 (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Gnangarra's concerns. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose per all other contras. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:39, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People