Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Fuentona, Muriel de la Fuente, Soria, España, 2021-08-28, DD 42.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2023 at 20:14:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Spain
Info La Fuentona, Muriel de la Fuente, Soria, Spain. The natural spring is a natural monument since 1998. There are only 6 such monuments in the Community of Castile and León (the biggest in Spain by surface). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)- Support --XRay 💬 08:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Comment First thought: huge! Second thought: Meh. I tried to figure out why, looking some time at the picture in detail and I think, the first attraction came from the great capture of the colourful clear water and the meadow behind it. But when you look around, you detect few grey hills, that aren't very interesting, which take a lot of space in the background. This could have led to the meh. I wonder if a tighter crop would lead to more powerful impression, and I wonder if the resolution is suffient, when the hills in the backgorund would be cropped out and I wonder if it's necessary or wanted overall. Maybe others like the first impression or the contrast beetween the void hills an the nice oasis thing in the valley or think it's a FP anyway.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Princess Rosalina 🍵 459265 07:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I think this is very good, but I would prefer more room on the upper right, so that those nice big evergreens are not cut off. I don't know what would be further up and to the right in this motif, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support This image could benefit from slight saturation boost. --Argenberg (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Neutral per Argenberg. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Argenberg and Daniel Case: I've increased the saturation a bit, along with some cloning and highlights reduction.
- @Der Angemeldete and Ikan Kekek: Obviously I cannot address your comments regarding tigther and wider crop in one version, but I can show you other version of the motif, maybe you like one of them better: tigther, wider. Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I do like the composition with the widest crop best. All three are good photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, if I would support an almost wider crop, but what I do know, is that the more narrow one isn't that spectacular either. I think it might be good as it is.--Der Angemeldete (talk) 16:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support A fascinating place, especially with the contrast between the green paradisiacal spring and the arid slopes around it. --Aristeas (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Spain
