Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laelatu puisniit.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Laelatu puisniit.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2016 at 20:32:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created and uploaded by Margus6 - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 20:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)- Info Up to 76 species of vascular plants have been counted there on a square meter - 2nd best result in the world for small scale biodiversity (i.e. no. of species per 1 m2).
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 20:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)- Support INeverCry 20:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support--Ralf Roleček 21:43, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Neutral I have some trouble getting excited over this pic since such landscapes are very much "home" to me and I know that photos of them can be so much better than this, but I won't oppose it either since it may look as exotic to others as the Andes are to me. Could also be a bit sharper. w.carter-Talk 21:52, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Probably a good document, but not appealing to me. Also not sharp enough.--Jebulon (talk) 23:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)- Oppose While it's better than the inevitable tide of autumn pics we see from first-time nominators come October and November, it still isn't striking enough to me to be featurable (it would be nice if it drew me further into it than just a few meters beyond the lens, and maybe it would be better on a sunny day). Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - Perhaps Wikipedia would be interested in featuring this photo for the encyclopedic fact about biodiversity, but for the purposes of Commons, I'd submit that it's neither an interesting image nor is it composed or cropped in an interesting or seemingly logical way. Sorry, I know that sounds harsh, but it's truly my reaction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support For me the image is very beautiful. May be that it should be a bit sharper. -- Spurzem (talk) 11:17, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - A beautiful place indeed but the lightning is flat and sharpness could be better. Wow-factor is low. So unfortunately an oppose from my side. --Pugilist (talk) 12:23, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose mostly for quality. Flat contrast and poor detail for a less-than-10-mpix candidate. Composition looks random, the message on biodiversity needs explanation. Certainly most interesting but not outstanding as a photographic work as such. --Kreuzschnabel 12:57, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 20:53, 22 August 2016 (UTC)- Support --Isasza (talk) 19:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 02:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
