Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lahad-Datu Sabah Mount-Silam-Red-Crab-Geosesarma-aurantium-02.jpg

File:Lahad-Datu Sabah Mount-Silam-Red-Crab-Geosesarma-aurantium-02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2014 at 15:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lahad-Datu Sabah Mount-Silam-Red-Crab-Geosesarma-aurantium-02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lahad-Datu Sabah Mount-Silam-Red-Crab-Geosesarma-aurantium-02.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Cccefalon - -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

 Comment I had a square crop version nominated earlier which raised some frowning. Here is another view of the same crab. Symmetrical view, as it was the desire. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --XRay ^talk 07:07, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good and interesting. Yann (talk) 07:11, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico talk 23:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Einstein2 (talk) 12:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Tuxyso (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:41, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:59, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jiel (talk) 22:38, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose To me the crab on an human-made surface (or at least out of his habitat) steals the "featureability" IMHO, sorry, Poco² 18:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

 Comment This is an example for Heisenberg uncertainty principle: You either kill the 15 mm crab (which can move incredibly fast) in their natural habitat to prevent her from leaving the DoF or you get her alive in a place where she cannot escape and shot 40 photos with the macro lense to get a reasonable sharp shot. No animal was harmed during the session. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment In my opinion all votes emitted until now are invalid, because you had 3 or even 4 nominations at the same time open, and therefore this nomination was not aligned with the policies. Therefore I suggest to relaunch it, but I am not sure how this was solved in the past. I see no issue with the FPC above because it was just open for a hour, not sure about this, though. Poco² 19:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

 Comment I thought the two previous were already dead after the overall judgement. Especially this second nomination of the crab was an alternative to the square version because of the crop objections. I did not knew how to place an alternative version. Apologies, it was not meant to flood the FPC. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

If we understand it as an alternative placed in the wrong place, then it is ok, I guess. Still, you have a lot of examples of how to place alternatives, you can always look up what others do. It is usually enough to create a subsection in the nomination titled "Alternative" and place there the new version. Poco² 23:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Support--Tamba52 (talk) 06:05, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 03:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods