Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Myocastor coypus 2016 G1.jpg

File:Myocastor coypus 2016 G1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2017 at 08:33:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Myocastor coypus 2016 G1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Myocastor coypus 2016 G1.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info created and uploaded by George Chernilevsky - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I admit to having a soft spot for rodents because I had pet guinea pigs as a child, but I think this is a good composition as well as a cute baby nutria. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

I don't understand what's wrong with my categories. Please fix or suggest how I should fix this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment As far as I can see, there's no relevant subcategory below Mammals, so I've removed the rest. --Basotxerri (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - That's kind of insane. Thanks for taking care of the problem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm not wild about the shadow top right. Charles (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Many thanks, Ikan Kekek -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

• You're welcome. I enjoyed other photos in this series, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Charles. lNeverCry 00:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow for me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Cute little critter but there is too much white in the vegetation, making it look bland, and then there is that unfortunate shadow top right that gives this photo a bit of snapshot quality. Sorry. --cart-Talk 11:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment George Chernilevsky, would you like to try to address the critics' points with some editing (alter white balance, perhaps brighten the shadow, if that isn't too dishonest a thing to do), or should I withdraw? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

• Ikan, I did a quick fix of this photo to see if it could be improved. Lightening the shadow up right, I see that it is not a dark patch of plants but something furry, most likely part of another nutria. Sorry. --cart-Talk 16:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
• Ikan, I prefer withdraw now. W.carter is right about another nutria. Anyway, thank You for nomination. And thanks to all for reviews. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

OK.  I withdraw my nomination. But I hope we do eventually get an FP nutria picture from you because those baby nutrias are so cute! :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 09:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)