Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paysandisia archon MHNT Dos Vif Fronton.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2019 at 05:41:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info created and uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Boothsift -- BoothSift 05:41, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Support -- BoothSift 05:41, 12 May 2019 (UTC)- Support Great! --Yann (talk) 06:41, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support Great composition and good resolution, but why would one use f/29 aperture for a picture like this? It does lead to a considerable amount of diffraction softness. Cmao20 (talk) 07:10, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment Butterflies are alive and very capricious! By shooting at F25-29 you are sure to have a good quality image, with diffractions. At F7-10 you have a very beautiful image but if it moves it will be fuzzy and if it does not move you will have a lot of areas that will be out of depth of field. In this case, the distortions have been corrected. The iridescence on the butterflies are all natural.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Diffraction softness. – Lucas 08:36, 12 May 2019 (UTC)- Support - This insect is only 90-110 mm, so I feel impelled to support because of the excellent level of detail relative to size, and also the fine composition, without prejudice to the discussion on diffraction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:16, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:52, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support In fact he did not move! I had time to catch it, it was entrusted to the entomologists of the MHNT where it was naturalized and it is part of the collections. The palm was slaughtered along with 5 others. The infection is still in progress but it is contained without the need for further slaughter. Thanks to Boothsift (talk · contribs) for this nomination --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:44, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Weak support I wish it didn't have that diffraction, but if that was the only one to get an image without motion blur, then so be it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 11:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
