Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Philippe Chaperon by Atelier Nadar.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Philippe Chaperon by Atelier Nadar.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2023 at 17:04:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Atelier Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)- Info Fun fact: He has articles on six Wikipedias, and the worst is the French Wikipedia article, barely a stub and a gallery, which is weird, given he's French. Farsi and Egyptian Arabic have slightly more bulked up stubs, and the short but reasonably substantial English, Italian, and Belarussian articles appear to be pretty similar, probably translations. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice portrait. Yann (talk) 18:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Portrait could be higher quality; just saying. 20 upper 08:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @20 upper: I'd say it's pretty darn good for the 19th century myself, but alright. Not sure how that comment's helpful, given Chaperon's been dead for 117 years, making it very hard to get a new photo. Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Adam Cuerden: IMO, the image is of good quality but.....it's not up to standards. 20 upper 08:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @20 upper: Well,I'm not the universal arbitrator, and that's... fair if that's your opinion, but more detail about what you don't like would help judge other photos. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not everyone has to approve restored images as suitable for Commmons FP status, Adam. Would the noise on this image, for instance, look the same if you examined a 19th Century print with a magnifying glass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Pretty much, aye; might vary depending on lighting because texture shows up differently in different light and angles. I mean, the originaæ (File: Philippe Chaperon by Atelier Nadar - Original.jpg is a 19th century print, so compare at will. I'm pretty careful with trying to keep texture; I don't use filters. But 20 upper didn't say what the issue was, other than a vague quality statement, which is why I was asking. I'd like to know people's thoughts on these things, because, whether I agree with objections or not, I'd like to understand them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Not everyone has to approve restored images as suitable for Commmons FP status, Adam. Would the noise on this image, for instance, look the same if you examined a 19th Century print with a magnifying glass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @20 upper: Well,I'm not the universal arbitrator, and that's... fair if that's your opinion, but more detail about what you don't like would help judge other photos. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Adam Cuerden: IMO, the image is of good quality but.....it's not up to standards. 20 upper 08:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- @20 upper: I'd say it's pretty darn good for the 19th century myself, but alright. Not sure how that comment's helpful, given Chaperon's been dead for 117 years, making it very hard to get a new photo. Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men
