Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Resciesa Mont Dedite y Danter la Montes Urtijei.jpg

File:Resciesa Mont Dedite y Danter la Montes Urtijei.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2016 at 19:47:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Resciesa Mont Dedite y Danter la Montes Urtijei.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Resciesa Mont Dedite y Danter la Montes Urtijei.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 20:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 20:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment On my monitor this is underexposed. The rock in the foreground is relatively too dark. Charles (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

• It may be your monitor ;) (have you calibrated it ?) Looks fine on mine (even a bit bright and washed out) and histogram reflects what I see. But I do need to calibrate mine. - Benh (talk) 21:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Oops @Benh: . I meant over-exposed! Sorry Charles (talk) 11:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I've looked at this on a few monitors and it seems fine -- Thennicke (talk) 00:50, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I thought this might be an FP when I saw it in QIC. Jee 04:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support cart-Talk 05:49, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Very good mix between foreground, middleground and backgrounds of increasing distance, and really well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose A beautiful picture indeed. Still, I would appreciate a "punchier" look, as the contrast is somewhat reduced by the haze. Also, the corner sharpness is less than optimal due to lens limitations, perhaps combined with a generous usage of hyperfocal distance and field curvature. I know I am nitpicking, but we are here to select the very best of WP Commons... --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 11:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I can't ask for much more. Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful scenery but I don’t like these washed-out colours. --Kreuzschnabel 20:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 15:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kreuzschnabel --Milseburg (talk) 14:19, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 23:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural