Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rouge park trail panorama.jpg

File:Rouge park trail panorama.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2019 at 01:01:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rouge park trail panorama.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rouge park trail panorama.jpg

20

-20

7456

2920

7496

4000

Suggested crop to take care of the dark lower right side: Use 2/3 sky and about 1/3 field.

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada
•  Info: golden hour on a recently opened trail in the Rouge National Urban Park. The area consists of active agricultural land (soybean cultivation) and a restored meadow ecosystem. I think the colours make it a worthy candidate. All by me. -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 04:54, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment The stitching error at the upper edge of the field in the middle should be fixed.--Ermell (talk) 07:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Good catch, thanks, will get to it later today. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:38, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

 Done, Ermell --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Very well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 12:53, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Good, sensitive picture, but I find that the dark areas to the right of the path hog too much attention, and the overall composition doesn't quite work for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:32, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan, sorry. --A.Savin 21:54, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I also think, if you made the picture at the begin of the asphalt trail without the wooden path, it would be better. -- -donald- (talk) 11:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the right third of the image doesn't really contribute to the composition, and would be better cropped off. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

   Support Very nice now, love the clouds. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Done: cropped the less interesting part on the right Ikan Kekek, A.Savin, King of Hearts. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - Definitely better, but still not quite working for me so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral I really like the light, and the fact the trail and line of clouds meet on the far left. Just, how sad it is so close to the border. I think I also agree the wooden part might be too much. It's hard to tell for sure, but the panorama might be slightly bended (upward curvature horizon) - Benh (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Regarding your last point, the area is on a glacial moraine, resulting in undulating topography, so you wouldn't get a perfectly straight horizon there. It was more obvious before I cropped a big chunk on the right. The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:52, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 01:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral Per Ikan and King of Hearts --Boothsift 06:03, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral pending revision: Why not crop to 2/3 sky vs 1/3 land to get rid of the dark right side (cf. note); the sky is best anyhow -- Axel ^(talk) 06:43, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. -- Pofka (talk) 11:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Cosmonaut about the colors. It's an overall quite pleasing image. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  21:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 3 neutral → not featured. /--Boothsift 16:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)