Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sara - Perro Pastor 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Sara - Perro Pastor 01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2017 at 16:39:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora
Info all by me - Basotxerri -- Basotxerri (talk) 16:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment Everytime I see this picture, I have to smile. Perhaps it's not good enough for a FP but I want to give it a try. BTW, Sara is the name of village where I found this dog, it's not his name... --Basotxerri (talk) 16:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 16:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)- Support This works better than just a closeup of the dog (and what a dog face!) would have. It's a busy background, but its effect is literally softened, and what emerges is an image that tells how sleepy this town is. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support per Daniel. Jee 03:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support right shadow is distracting (I added note) --The Photographer 17:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- @The Photographer: You're absolutely right, the shadow was a bit disturbing. I've tried to correct it with a series of radial filters but I can't remove it entirely. However, I think it's better now. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- I found your fix good, however, a bit bright and I thought on help you, I uploaded another versio, however, I rollbacked myself, if it's ok for you you can keep it on top. A hug --The Photographer 22:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- @The Photographer: ¡Muchas gracias, compañero! That was very kind from you and looks much, much better! --Basotxerri (talk) 15:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Siempre a tu orden muchacho!, lol --The Photographer 15:46, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 07:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Quality not there, possibly due to camera limitations? Charles (talk) 18:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, sharpness/definition on the dog. Charles (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment An MFT isn't a full frame camera of course. Where do you see the problems, though? Sharpness? Noise? --Basotxerri (talk) 08:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support I like the laziness of it. I also see that we are attracted to the same shapes/textures to shoot. ;) --cart-Talk 21:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment LOL! ...only missing the eyes and the nose... --Basotxerri (talk) 08:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Those "details" are what makes this an FPC and mine not. :) --cart-Talk 08:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support I actually like it. --Mile (talk) 06:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support A good balance in the photo, dog sharp in the foreground and a background that's going down. --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora
