Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Surfer in california 2.JPG

File:Surfer in california 2.JPG, featured

Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2009 at 04:34:29

•  Info created by Mbz1 - uploaded by wadester16 - nominated by Specious -- Specious (talk) 04:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Specious (talk) 04:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I'm no good at surfing, but I can appreciate the poetry of this picture. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 06:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support-- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 11:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Great shot! The another version is great also. —kallerna™ 13:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks a lot, Specious for nominating of my image.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment No problem! It never seems to work when I nominate my own anyway :) It's an impressive shot! --Specious (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ianaré (talk) 15:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, and another version seems more interesting --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Only Mila can take images of such quality! --Leoboudv (talk) 06:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Maedin\talk 14:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

A surfer at the wave.jpg, withdrawn

•  Info Here's an alternative, except the community would vote to feature both images. IMO the first image is more about surfer while the second one is more about surfing :) Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 17:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I suggest that you make separate pages, because both of these could be featured IMO. —kallerna™ 13:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I created a separate page.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

 Question Where is it? There's nothing on the candidates list for this image. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 16:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, it deppends how you're going to vote. If you are to support, it is right here, if you are to oppose, I do not know where it is. :) It is 3.19 on candidates list, but maybe I've done something wrong.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

 Comment No. I mean you'll have to make a new nomination just for this image and physically copy all of the votes over; at the moment it's still classed as part of the original nomination. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

May I physically copy only support votes please? :)--Mbz1 (talk) 17:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Open the candidates list, click edit and scroll down. This picture has no entry. The one above does, but not this one. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 16:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

You'll know it's right when the (currently black) title text is blue and hyperlinked to the nomination. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 16:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support besser --Böhringer (talk) 15:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose too dark --ianaré (talk) 15:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment I made bit lighter version. —kallerna™ 16:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  new nomination added just below--Mbz1 (talk) 17:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured - withdrawn by nominator. Richard Bartz (talk) 20:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)