Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Grand Congratulatory Ceremony to Celebrate the Fortieth Birthday of Queen Dowager Jo.jpg

File:The Grand Congratulatory Ceremony to Celebrate the Fortieth Birthday of Queen Dowager Jo.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2021 at 13:49:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The Grand Congratulatory Ceremony to Celebrate the Fortieth Birthday of Queen Dowager Jo.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Grand Congratulatory Ceremony to Celebrate the Fortieth Birthday of Queen Dowager Jo.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1900
•  Info created by unknown (Official painter of the Joseon Dynaty) - uploaded by Sadopaul - nominated by Sadopaul -- — Sadopaul 📁 13:49, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- — Sadopaul 📁 13:49, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Really impressive resolution. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:27, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Really big and interesting, of very high educational value. The file should be renamed after the nomination is over, though. "Congratulatory" is misspelled. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 05:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per KoH and Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 07:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per above. --Cayambe (talk) 07:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose IHMO there is nothing special on this image for FP nomination (with exception of extreme high resoluton, off course). -- Karelj (talk) 09:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Question No educational value? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

• Educational value extremely high for people learning japanese alphabet (not my case, sorry). But this has nothing to do with FP nomination, IHMO, -- Karelj (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Info The scripts on this folding screen is written in Chinese character, not Japanese. By the way, I appreciate your vote. Thank you.— Sadopaul 💬 📁 22:31, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

• [Edit conflict:] This isn't Japanese (which also doesn't have an alphabet, but that's a tangent here) and isn't only calligraphy, but I don't understand why you vote against features because you say they lack educational value, whereas in this case, it obviously has educational value if you look at what is depicted, and you admit the quality is very high. I feel like you're somehow trying to have it both ways. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 11:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --IamMM (talk) 13:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Neutral until the filename typo is corrected per my {{Rename}} request. Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Done I would have preferred to do this after the nomination is over, as Ikan has suggested, because renaming an active nomination is complicated and error-prone, but I hope I did everything correctly. --Aristeas (talk) 06:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:50, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sajbadina (talk) 02:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 07:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 20:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Impressive. — Băng Tỏa (talk) 20:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1850-1900