Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Piletas.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2015 at 15:58:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Pedro J Pacheco - uploaded by Pedro J Pacheco - nominated by User:Pedro J Pacheco -- Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 15:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 15:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)- Support --Hubertl (talk) 16:28, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Kikos (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Request can you fix the noted image errors please? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Done thanks. Fixed. Please check. I don´t know if the file is automaticaly updated here. --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 22:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support now. Thanks. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 03:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support but agree with Alchemist, that must be fixed. --Kadellar (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support Magnífica imagen --· Favalli ⟡ 00:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support Más buenas fotos de Argentina. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Oppose The foreground and the background is out of focus, and nothing wow here, and actually, if someone here have searched "pools in salinas grande" could see that the colour is not even close to other photos away prettier [1], the salina is pure white, not grey, all this lines and nothing to see at the end, this should be take in another hour... ArionEstar for god, stop voting for any South America candidate... -- RTA 04:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Really? :) It was a hard work for me to find "pure white" salt around the pools in your googled samples. Next time I will try to go when snowy weather to make your dream come true ;) . About the focus, that´s indeed a real argument. Thanks --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 08:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- If you took this in raw, you can achieve the pure white just increasing the white, and the highlights. -- RTA 13:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- q.e.d. just a touch in highlights and in the white; and you used Lightroom, so, if press "auto" in correction of you lens you can fix the non level issue that are happening. Next time, avoid this hour of the they, the hard light in the right corners is not good at all, and if not able to use Google and find whites in the photos, do not be rude in a tentative to alleviate your on problems, solve than first and do not vent in others. -- RTA 15:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Of course not trying to be rude, pls forgive me if my words sound this way. I will try your way. Good advice at all. --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 15:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- "...nothing wow here..."?!? What?!? A photo of pools in a saline is very interesting and has wow yes, is not anywhere in the world that this is found. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Modified picture adding white level and a litle bit of lens correction. I was not able "to make it more white" without loosing details in the salt, but thank to your advice, picture looks better now. Thank you --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 18:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Rodrigo.Argenton: And "Más buenas fotos de Argentina" is just a request I did. It is not the reason for my support. ;) 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Modified picture adding white level and a litle bit of lens correction. I was not able "to make it more white" without loosing details in the salt, but thank to your advice, picture looks better now. Thank you --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 18:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- "...nothing wow here..."?!? What?!? A photo of pools in a saline is very interesting and has wow yes, is not anywhere in the world that this is found. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Of course not trying to be rude, pls forgive me if my words sound this way. I will try your way. Good advice at all. --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 15:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Really? :) It was a hard work for me to find "pure white" salt around the pools in your googled samples. Next time I will try to go when snowy weather to make your dream come true ;) . About the focus, that´s indeed a real argument. Thanks --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 08:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, yeah, we all know... Arion... -- RTA 20:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I love the idea but depth of field is just insufficient. The f/5 should have been something like f/11 or even f/16. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Of course not! This would give a little more DOF, not enough, in addition to that all the sharpness, that is already not that great, would be gone! Bracketing, or a T&S lens is the options. -- RTA 20:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico talk 09:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per KoH. I think there is a contradiction between the subject (a perspective), and the choice of the depth of field. It is a pity, because this picture is really interesting and unusual for me.--Jebulon (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose I so wanted to support this image. I thought its only real problem was the bottom, and that could be solved by a well-placed crop. I looked at it in high-res and saw the DoF problems. Very well, there might have been nothing that could have been done about that.
But then I saw in the metadata that it was shot at ... f/5! That is a very fixable problem ... take the image over at f/11–13. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination You are right people, no reason for this F5 in this kind of picture. Next time I should try better. Thank you all. --Pedro J Pacheco (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
